Literature DB >> 30591171

Influence of the hyrax expander screw position on stress distribution in the maxilla: A study with finite elements.

Letícia Chaves Fernandes1, Robert Willer Farinazzo Vitral2, Pedro Yoshito Noritomi3, Carina Abrantes Schmitberger1, Marcio José da Silva Campos1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Our objective was to evaluate the stress and deformation distribution patterns on the maxillary bone structure using the finite element method by simulation of different vertical and anteroposterior positions of the expansion screw on the hyrax expander appliance.
METHODS: Part of the maxilla with anchorage teeth, midpalatal suture, and the hyrax appliance were modeled, and 6 distinct finite element method models were created to simulate different positions of the expansion screw. There were 2 vertical positions at distances of 20 and 15 mm from the occlusal plane. Another 3 positions were anteroposterior, with the center of the screw placed between and equidistant from the mesial face of the first molar and the distal face of the first premolar, aligned to the center of the crown of the first molar, and the anterior edge of the screw aligned to the distal face of the first molar. The initial activations of the expanders were simulated, and the stress distributions on the maxilla in each model were registered.
RESULTS: The stress was concentrated in the anterior region of the models, close to the incisive foramen, dissipating through the palate in the posterior and lateral orientations, in the direction of the pterygoid pillar, diverting from the midpalatal suture region. When the expander screw was simulated closer to the occlusal plane and in a more anterior position, more stress was located around the incisive foramen and distributed through the midpalatal suture to its posterior portion. More posterior positions resulted in concentrated stress around the pterygoid pillars. At all simulations, the midpalatal suture showed a V-shaped expansion, with the vertex superior in the coronal view and posterior in the axial view.
CONCLUSIONS: Different positions of the expander screw interfered with stress intensity and distribution patterns. When the expansion screw was simulated in a more occlusal and anterior position, it was more efficient to transfer the mechanical effects from the appliance to the bone structures.
Copyright © 2018 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30591171     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.03.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  2 in total

1.  Biomechanical effects of Teuscher activator in hyperdivergent Class II malocclusion treatment: A finite element analysis.

Authors:  Marta Jorge; Mário Vaz; Jorge Lopes; Josep-Maria Ustrell-Torrent; Behzad Farahani; Maria-João Ponces
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-11-01

2.  Influence of Hyrax screw position on dental movement and cortical bone: A study of finite elements.

Authors:  Sandra-Liliana Gómez-Gómez; Junes-Abdul Villarraga-Ossa; Juan-Camilo Arcila-Monsalve; Diana-Marcela Moreno-Garzón; Carlos-Martin Ardila
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-12-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.