Literature DB >> 30590610

Differences in prevalence of welfare indicators in male and female turkey flocks (Meleagris gallopavo).

Valentina Ferrante1, Susanna Lolli1, Lorenzo Ferrari1, Tatiane Terumi Negrão Watanabe2, Carlo Tremolada3, Joanna Marchewka4, Inma Estevez5,6.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown that the transect walks (TW) method provide a practical and effective approach to welfare assessment in broiler and turkey farms. This method for turkey welfare assessment is reasonable in terms of time demands within minimal costs. Furthermore, TW approach resembles the routine checks used by farmers. The overall aim of this study was to verify the feasibility of the TW method as potential practical tool for on-farm welfare assessment in turkeys during the fattening period. A total of 14 commercial turkey farms (8 male and 6 female flocks) of the same genetic strain (British United Turkeys [B.U.T.] - Big 6) with similar management standard procedures were evaluated. Bird ages at evaluation ranged from 122 to 138 D and 90 to 103 D old, for males and females, respectively. Two independent assessors walked slowly on randomized longitudinal paths (transects) within each house, while recording the prevalence of birds showing any of the 12 welfare and health indicators considered: immobility, lameness, wounds, small size, featherless, dirtiness, sick, terminally ill, dead, and behavioral indicators, such as, aggression towards mate, interaction with humans and mating. The effect of assessor, gender, and interaction assessor by gender was evaluated by using ANOVA. Reliability of the method was noted by the effect of gender (P < 0.001) for immobility, lameness, wounds, and dirtiness indicators. Male flocks showed higher prevalence of immobility (0.035±0.004% vs. 0.004±0.001%), lameness (2.269±0.108% vs. 1.253±0.051%), wounds (0.288±0.014% vs. 0.127±0.009%), and dirtiness (0.050±0.004% vs. 0.022±0.004%) as compared to female flocks. Differences among assessors were relatively minor, with differences detected only for back and tail wounds, dirtiness, aggression towards mate, and interaction with humans. This study reports advantages and limitations of this method for welfare assessment on-commercial turkey flocks and it is the first description of the Italian welfare profile of turkey's commercial flocks.
© 2018 Poultry Science Association Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal-based indicators; on-farm protocol; turkey; welfare assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30590610     DOI: 10.3382/ps/pey534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  7 in total

1.  Farmers' Perceptions About Health and Welfare Issues in Turkey Production.

Authors:  Nienke van Staaveren; Emily M Leishman; Benjamin J Wood; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek; Christine F Baes
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-06-12

2.  Sound Analysis to Predict the Growth of Turkeys.

Authors:  El-Sayed M Abdel-Kafy; Samya E Ibraheim; Alberto Finzi; Sabbah F Youssef; Fatma M Behiry; Giorgio Provolo
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Animal-Based Measures for the On-Farm Welfare Assessment of Geese.

Authors:  Carlo Tremolada; Halina Bielińska; Michela Minero; Valentina Ferrante; Elisabetta Canali; Sara Barbieri
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Associations between animal-based measures at 11 wk and slaughter data at 20 wk in turkey toms (Meleagris gallopavo).

Authors:  Guro Vasdal; Joanna Marchewka; Randi O Moe
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  The Relationships between Damaging Behaviours and Health in Laying Hens.

Authors:  Virginie Michel; Jutta Berk; Nadya Bozakova; Jerine van der Eijk; Inma Estevez; Teodora Mircheva; Renata Relic; T Bas Rodenburg; Evangelia N Sossidou; Maryse Guinebretière
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.231

6.  Associations between on-farm welfare measures and slaughterhouse data in commercial flocks of turkey hens (Meleagris gallopavo).

Authors:  Joanna Marchewka; Guro Vasdal; Randi O Moe
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Research Note: Injurious pecking in fattening turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo f. dom.)-video analyses of triggering factors and behavioral sequences in small flocks of male turkeys.

Authors:  T Bartels; R A Stuhrmann; E T Krause; L Schrader
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-09-13       Impact factor: 3.352

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.