Literature DB >> 30590463

Differential Representations of Perceived and Retrieved Visual Information in Hippocampus and Cortex.

Sue-Hyun Lee1,2,3, Dwight J Kravitz4, Chris I Baker1.   

Abstract

Memory retrieval is thought to depend on interactions between hippocampus and cortex, but the nature of representation in these regions and their relationship remains unclear. Here, we performed an ultra-high field fMRI (7T) experiment, comprising perception, learning and retrieval sessions. We observed a fundamental difference between representations in hippocampus and high-level visual cortex during perception and retrieval. First, while object-selective posterior fusiform cortex showed consistent responses that allowed us to decode object identity across both perception and retrieval one day after learning, object decoding in hippocampus was much stronger during retrieval than perception. Second, in visual cortex but not hippocampus, there was consistency in response patterns between perception and retrieval, suggesting that substantial neural populations are shared for both perception and retrieval. Finally, the decoding in hippocampus during retrieval was not observed when retrieval was tested on the same day as learning suggesting that the retrieval process itself is not sufficient to elicit decodable object representations. Collectively, these findings suggest that while cortical representations are stable between perception and retrieval, hippocampal representations are much stronger during retrieval, implying some form of reorganization of the representations between perception and retrieval. Published by Oxford University Press 2018. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.

Keywords:  fMRI; hippocampus; memory retrieval; perception; visual cortex

Year:  2019        PMID: 30590463      PMCID: PMC7302513          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhy325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  55 in total

1.  Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain.

Authors:  Bruce Fischl; David H Salat; Evelina Busa; Marilyn Albert; Megan Dieterich; Christian Haselgrove; Andre van der Kouwe; Ron Killiany; David Kennedy; Shuna Klaveness; Albert Montillo; Nikos Makris; Bruce Rosen; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: a complementary-learning-systems approach.

Authors:  Kenneth A Norman; Randall C O'Reilly
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Content representation in the human medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Jackson C Liang; Anthony D Wagner; Alison R Preston
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  MR volumetric analysis of the human entorhinal, perirhinal, and temporopolar cortices.

Authors:  R Insausti; K Juottonen; H Soininen; A M Insausti; K Partanen; P Vainio; M P Laakso; A Pitkänen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Real-world scene representations in high-level visual cortex: it's the spaces more than the places.

Authors:  Dwight J Kravitz; Cynthia S Peng; Chris I Baker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Global similarity and pattern separation in the human medial temporal lobe predict subsequent memory.

Authors:  Karen F LaRocque; Mary E Smith; Valerie A Carr; Nathan Witthoft; Kalanit Grill-Spector; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Decoding individual episodic memory traces in the human hippocampus.

Authors:  Martin J Chadwick; Demis Hassabis; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Decoding representations of scenes in the medial temporal lobes.

Authors:  Heidi M Bonnici; Dharshan Kumaran; Martin J Chadwick; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Demis Hassabis; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.899

9.  Optogenetic stimulation of a hippocampal engram activates fear memory recall.

Authors:  Xu Liu; Steve Ramirez; Petti T Pang; Corey B Puryear; Arvind Govindarajan; Karl Deisseroth; Susumu Tonegawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The hippocampus supports multiple cognitive processes through relational binding and comparison.

Authors:  Rosanna K Olsen; Sandra N Moses; Lily Riggs; Jennifer D Ryan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  12 in total

1.  How Multiple Retrievals Affect Neural Reactivation in Young and Older Adults.

Authors:  Marie St-Laurent; Bradley R Buchsbaum
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Statistical prediction of the future impairs episodic encoding of the present.

Authors:  Brynn E Sherman; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  What do neuroanatomical networks reveal about the ontology of human cognitive abilities?

Authors:  Daniel Kristanto; Xinyang Liu; Werner Sommer; Andrea Hildebrandt; Changsong Zhou
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-07-03

4.  Perception and memory have distinct spatial tuning properties in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Serra E Favila; Brice A Kuhl; Jonathan Winawer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 5.  Transforming the Concept of Memory Reactivation.

Authors:  Serra E Favila; Hongmi Lee; Brice A Kuhl
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 13.837

6.  Cortical Representations of Visual Stimuli Shift Locations with Changes in Memory States.

Authors:  Nicole M Long; Brice A Kuhl
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Distinct Representational Structure and Localization for Visual Encoding and Recall during Visual Imagery.

Authors:  Wilma A Bainbridge; Elizabeth H Hall; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Strong correspondence between prefrontal and visual representations during emotional perception.

Authors:  Doyoung Park; Taehyun Kim; Sue-Hyun Lee
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 9.  Is Reconsolidation a General Property of Memory?

Authors:  Gayoung Kim; Minjae Kwon; Wonjun Kang; Sue-Hyun Lee
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Reinstatement of item-specific contextual details during retrieval supports recombination-related false memories.

Authors:  Alexis C Carpenter; Preston P Thakral; Alison R Preston; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.