Literature DB >> 30590387

The Interaction of a Diabetes Gene Risk Score With 3 Different Antihypertensive Medications for Incident Glucose-level Elevation.

Joshua I Barzilay1, Dejian Lai2, Barry R Davis3, Sara Pressel3, Hannah E Previn2, Donna K Arnett4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Elevations of fasting glucose (FG) levels are frequently encountered in people treated with thiazide diuretics. The risk is lower in people treated with ACE inhibitors (ACEi). To determine if genetic factors play a role in FG elevation, we examined the interaction of a diabetes gene risk score (GRS) with the use of 3 different antihypertensive medications.
METHODS: We examined 376 nondiabetic hypertensive individuals with baseline FG <100 mg/dl who were genotyped for 24 genes associated with risk of elevated glucose levels. All participants had ≥1 follow-up FG level over 6 years of follow-up. Participants were randomized to treatment with a thiazide-like diuretic (chlorthalidone), a calcium channel blocker (CCB; amlodipine), or an ACEi (lisinopril). Outcomes were an FG increase of ≥13 or ≥27 mg/dl, the upper 75% and 90% FG increase in the parent cohort from which the present cohort was obtained. Odds ratios were adjusted for factors that increase FG levels.
RESULTS: For every 1 allele increase in GRS, the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were 1.06 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99, 1.14; P = 0.06) and 1.09 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.20; P = 0.08). When results were examined by randomized medications, participants randomized to amlodipine had statistically significant odds for either outcome (OR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.48; P = 0.01 and OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.62; P = 0.01). No such risk increase was found in participants randomized to the other 2 medications.
CONCLUSIONS: A diabetes GRS predicts FG elevation in people treated with a CCB, but not with an ACEi or diuretic. These findings require confirmation. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Trial number NCT00000542. © American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd 2018. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  area under curve; blood pressure; diabetes; fasting glucose; gene risk score; hypertension; net reclassification improvement

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30590387      PMCID: PMC6420683          DOI: 10.1093/ajh/hpy199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  23 in total

Review 1.  Antihypertensive therapy and incidence of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Raj Padwal; Andreas Laupacis
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 2.  Clinical review: the genetics of type 2 diabetes: a realistic appraisal in 2008.

Authors:  Jose C Florez
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Different insulin-secretory responses to calcium-channel blockers in islets of lean and obese (ob/ob) mice.

Authors:  M A Black; L A Fournier; H M Heick; N Bégin-Heick
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1988-01-15       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT).

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Net reclassification improvement: computation, interpretation, and controversies: a literature review and clinician's guide.

Authors:  Maarten J G Leening; Moniek M Vedder; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Michael J Pencina; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Ramipril and the development of diabetes.

Authors:  S Yusuf; H Gerstein; B Hoogwerf; J Pogue; J Bosch; B H Wolffenbuttel; B Zinman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-10-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Epidemiology of hypertension and insulin resistance syndrome.

Authors:  S M Haffner
Journal:  J Hypertens Suppl       Date:  1997-01

Review 8.  Essential hypertension: an insulin-resistant state.

Authors:  E Ferrannini; S M Haffner; M P Stern
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.105

9.  Drug-Gene Interactions of Antihypertensive Medications and Risk of Incident Cardiovascular Disease: A Pharmacogenomics Study from the CHARGE Consortium.

Authors:  Joshua C Bis; Colleen Sitlani; Ryan Irvin; Christy L Avery; Albert Vernon Smith; Fangui Sun; Daniel S Evans; Solomon K Musani; Xiaohui Li; Stella Trompet; Bouwe P Krijthe; Tamara B Harris; P Miguel Quibrera; Jennifer A Brody; Serkalem Demissie; Barry R Davis; Kerri L Wiggins; Gregory J Tranah; Leslie A Lange; Nona Sotoodehnia; David J Stott; Oscar H Franco; Lenore J Launer; Til Stürmer; Kent D Taylor; L Adrienne Cupples; John H Eckfeldt; Nicholas L Smith; Yongmei Liu; James G Wilson; Susan R Heckbert; Brendan M Buckley; M Arfan Ikram; Eric Boerwinkle; Yii-Der Ida Chen; Anton J M de Craen; Andre G Uitterlinden; Jerome I Rotter; Ian Ford; Albert Hofman; Naveed Sattar; P Eline Slagboom; Rudi G J Westendorp; Vilmundur Gudnason; Ramachandran S Vasan; Thomas Lumley; Steven R Cummings; Herman A Taylor; Wendy Post; J Wouter Jukema; Bruno H Stricker; Eric A Whitsel; Bruce M Psaty; Donna Arnett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Utility of genetic and non-genetic risk factors in prediction of type 2 diabetes: Whitehall II prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Philippa J Talmud; Aroon D Hingorani; Jackie A Cooper; Michael G Marmot; Eric J Brunner; Meena Kumari; Mika Kivimäki; Steve E Humphries
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-01-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.