Literature DB >> 3058992

Arm circumference v. weight-for-height in nutritional assessment: are the findings comparable?

H D Gayle, N J Binkin, N W Staehling, F L Trowbridge.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1988        PMID： 3058992     DOI： 10.1093/tropej/34.5.213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trop Pediatr        ISSN： 0142-6338            Impact factor:   1.165


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Mid-arm circumference for detecting malnutrition during infancy.

Authors:  R C Bhatia; P A Pooni; H Singh; D Singh
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Epidemiological and clinical profile of hospitalized children with moderate and severe acute malnutrition in South India.

Authors:  R Usha Devi; Sriram Krishnamurthy; B Vishnu Bhat; Ajit Sahai
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  Detection of severe protein-energy malnutrition by nurses in The Gambia.

Authors:  C Hamer; K Kvatum; D Jeffries; S Allen
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Comparison of Mid-Upper Arm Circumference and Weight-for-Height to Diagnose Severe Acute Malnutrition: A Study in Southern Ethiopia.

Authors:  Amare Worku Tadesse; Elazar Tadesse; Yemane Berhane; Eva-Charlotte Ekström
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Severely malnourished children with a low weight-for-height have similar mortality to those with a low mid-upper-arm-circumference: II. Systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emmanuel Grellety; Michael H Golden
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 3.271

6.  Severely malnourished children with a low weight-for-height have a higher mortality than those with a low mid-upper-arm-circumference: I. Empirical data demonstrates Simpson's paradox.

Authors:  Emmanuel Grellety; Michael H Golden
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 3.271
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.