Literature DB >> 30589768

Total Muscle Coverage versus AlloDerm Human Dermal Matrix for Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

J Simon Ivey1, Hamid Abdollahi1, Fernando A Herrera1, Eric I Chang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic breast reconstruction is the most common method for treatment of patients undergoing mastectomy. Acellular dermal matrix has become more popular in implant-based breast reconstruction.
METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective review of all patients undergoing prosthetic breast reconstruction between August of 2002 and December of 2013. Patients were analyzed in terms of demographics, fill volumes, number of expansions, costs, and complications.
RESULTS: A total of 284 patients underwent mastectomy surgery with 481 implant-based breast reconstructions. Four hundred eight tissue expanders had total muscle coverage, whereas 73 had AlloDerm. The rate of overall complications and major complications was significantly higher in the AlloDerm group: 20.5 percent versus 8.8 percent (p = 0.005), and 13.7 percent versus 5.1 percent (p = 0.0001), respectively. The mean initial fill volume was significantly lower in the total muscle coverage group compared to the acellular dermal matrix group (54 ± 47 versus 167 ± 139; p = 0.00003), resulting in a higher number of expansions (8.1 versus 5.8; p = 0.000051) and longer time to full expansion (60.2 days versus 43.3 days; p = 0.0002). This did not translate into a faster time to expander exchange (162.4 days versus 162.3 days; p = 0.13). Use of AlloDerm added a mean cost of $2217 for each breast.
CONCLUSIONS: Implant-based breast reconstruction has evolved with the advent of acellular dermal matrices. Although the use of acellular dermal matrix allows increased initial fill volumes and fewer total expansions, there is an increased risk of complications and increased costs, especially in patients undergoing bilateral reconstruction. Total muscle coverage remains an excellent option for providing quality breast reconstruction without increased complications. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30589768     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  3 in total

1.  The Impact of Device Innovation on Clinical Outcomes in Expander-based Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Arash Momeni; Alexander Y Li; Jacqueline Tsai; Derrick Wan; Mardi R Karin; Irene L Wapnir
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-12-24

Review 2.  An overview of advanced biocompatible and biomimetic materials for creation of replacement structures in the musculoskeletal systems: focusing on cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors:  Azizeh Rahmani Del Bakhshayesh; Nahideh Asadi; Alireza Alihemmati; Hamid Tayefi Nasrabadi; Azadeh Montaseri; Soodabeh Davaran; Sepideh Saghati; Abolfazl Akbarzadeh; Ali Abedelahi
Journal:  J Biol Eng       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 4.355

3.  Evaluation of Dual-port versus Single-port Tissue Expanders in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Nisha Parmeshwar; Merisa Piper; Jennifer Viner; Robert Foster; Esther A Kim
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-07-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.