Literature DB >> 30589750

The economic footprint of acute care surgery in the United States: Implications for systems development.

Lisa M Knowlton1, Joseph Minei, Lakshika Tennakoon, Kimberly A Davis, Jay Doucet, Andrew Bernard, Adil Haider, L R Tres Scherer, David A Spain, Kristan L Staudenmayer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute care surgery (ACS) comprises trauma, surgical critical care, and emergency general surgery (EGS), encompassing both operative and nonoperative conditions. While the burden of EGS and trauma has been separately considered, the global footprint of ACS has not been fully characterized. We sought to characterize the costs and scope of influence of ACS-related conditions. We hypothesized that ACS patients comprise a substantial portion of the US inpatient population. We further hypothesized that ACS patients differ from other surgical and non-surgical patients across patient characteristics.
METHODS: We queried the National Inpatient Sample 2014, a nationally representative database for inpatient hospitalizations. To capture all adult ACS patients, we included adult admissions with any International Classification of Diseases-9th Rev.-Clinical Modification diagnosis of trauma or an International Classification of Diseases-9th Rev.-Clinical Modification diagnosis for one of the 16 AAST-defined EGS conditions. Weighted patient data were presented to provide national estimates.
RESULTS: Of the 29.2 million adult patients admitted to US hospitals, approximately 5.9 million (20%) patients had an ACS diagnosis. ACS patients accounted for US $85.8 billion, or 25% of total US inpatient costs (US $341 billion). When comparing ACS to non-ACS inpatient populations, ACS patients had higher rates of health care utilization with longer lengths of stay (5.9 days vs. 4.5 days, p < 0.001), and higher mean costs (US $14,466 vs. US $10,951, p < 0.001. Of all inpatients undergoing an operative procedure, 27% were patients with an ACS diagnosis. Overall, 3,186 (70%) of US hospitals cared for both trauma and EGS patients.
CONCLUSION: Acute care surgery patients comprise 20% of the inpatient population, but 25% of total inpatient costs in the United States. In addition to being costly, they overall have higher health care utilization and worse outcomes. This suggests that there is an opportunity to improve clinical trajectory for ACS patients that in turn, can affect the overall US health care costs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiologic, level III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30589750      PMCID: PMC6433481          DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.313


  14 in total

1.  In-house trauma attendings: a new financial benefit for hospitals.

Authors:  Linda A Dultz; H Leon Pachter; Ronald Simon
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2010-05

2.  Specialization: the answer or the problem?

Authors:  Matthew M Hutter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM mapping of the AAST Emergency General Surgery disease severity grading systems: Conceptual approach, limitations, and recommendations for the future.

Authors:  Garth H Utter; Preston R Miller; Nathan T Mowery; Gail T Tominaga; Oliver Gunter; Turner M Osler; David J Ciesla; Suresh K Agarwal; Kenji Inaba; Michel B Aboutanos; Carlos V R Brown; Steven E Ross; Marie L Crandall; Shahid Shafi
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.313

4.  The impending shortage and the estimated cost of training the future surgical workforce.

Authors:  Thomas E Williams; Bhagwan Satiani; Andrew Thomas; E Christopher Ellison
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Changing demographics of residents choosing fellowships: longterm data from the American Board of Surgery.

Authors:  Karen R Borman; Laura R Vick; Thomas W Biester; Marc E Mitchell
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  The public health burden of emergency general surgery in the United States: A 10-year analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample--2001 to 2010.

Authors:  Stephen C Gale; Shahid Shafi; Viktor Y Dombrovskiy; Dena Arumugam; Jessica S Crystal
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.313

7.  The financial burden of emergency general surgery: National estimates 2010 to 2060.

Authors:  Gerald O Ogola; Stephen C Gale; Adil Haider; Shahid Shafi
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.313

8.  Providing care for critically ill surgical patients: challenges and recommendations.

Authors:  Samuel A Tisherman; Lewis Kaplan; Vicente H Gracias; Gregory J Beilman; Christine Toevs; Matthew C Byrnes; Craig M Coopersmith
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 14.766

9.  Cost of specific emergency general surgery diseases and factors associated with high-cost patients.

Authors:  Gerald O Ogola; Shahid Shafi
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.313

10.  The dedicated emergency surgeon: towards consultant-based acute surgical admissions.

Authors:  P G Sorelli; N S El-Masry; P M Dawson; N A Theodorou
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.891

View more
  1 in total

1.  Emergency general surgeons: the special forces of general surgery (the "navy seals paradigm").

Authors:  Fausto Catena; Walter Biffl; Belinda De Simone; Massimo Sartelli; Salomone Di Saverio; Yoram Kluger; Ernest E Moore; Luca Ansaloni; Federico Coccolini
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 5.469

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.