Literature DB >> 30588255

Bone Metastases Pattern in Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Bladder Cancer: A Population-Based Study.

Chao Zhang1, Lele Liu1, Fang Tao1, Xu Guo1,2, Guowei Feng3, Feiran Chen3, Yao Xu1, Lili Li1, Xiuxin Han1, Vladimir P Baklaushev4, Andrey S Bryukhovetskiy5, Xin Wang6, Guowen Wang1.   

Abstract

Purpose: Based on a large-population analysis, we aimed to estimate the incidence and survival of bone metastases (BM) in initial bladder cancer (BC) patients and to identify the risk and prognostic factors of BC patients with BM. Patients and methods: Using the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, bladder cancer patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2014 were retrieved. Multivariate logistic and Cox regression analyses were employed to identify risk factors and prognostic factors for BM in BC patients. A Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test was used to estimate the overall survival for BC and the difference between the survival curves.
Results: A total of 1,223 (1.39%) BC patients were diagnosed with de novo BM. Variables such as age between 41 to 60 years, black race, unmarried status, higher T stage, higher N stage, poor tumour differentiation grade, lung metastases, liver metastases, and brain metastases were positively associated with BM occurrence. The median survival for BC patients with BM was dramatically decreased to 4.0 months. Factors including advanced age, absence of surgery, and presence of lung, liver, or brain metastases all predicted worse survival.
Conclusion: BM can dramatically decrease the survival of bladder cancer patients. The findings of the present study can provide population-based identification of risk and prognostic factors for BC patients with BM at initial diagnosis, which can be used for BM occurrence prediction and individualized treatment plan-making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SEER; bladder cancer; bone metastases; prognostic factor; risk factor

Year:  2018        PMID: 30588255      PMCID: PMC6299390          DOI: 10.7150/jca.28706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer        ISSN: 1837-9664            Impact factor:   4.207


Introduction

Bladder cancer (BC) is the seventh-most common malignancy and the second-most common urological malignancy in men 1. It was reported that annually, the number of new BC cases were more than 79,000, and annual death cases led by BC were more than 16,000 2. Patients with metastatic BC generally have a poor prognosis, surviving just a few months because of the ease with which it invades the muscle layer 3. In previous studies, approximately 10-15% of BC patients were reported to present at diagnosis with metastatic disease 4,5. Bone metastases (BM) were reported to be correlated with skeletal complications and decrease survival and quality of life in urogenital neoplasms patients 6-8. It is widely accepted that early diagnosis of BM from BC could benefit from timely medical intervention and skeletal-related events (SREs) prevention 4,7. Currently, there are no screening guidelines for performance of routine evaluation of BM in BC patients. Clinically, diagnosis of BM in BC patients mainly relies on bone scan and PET-CT scanning. However, considering the high cost burden of these tests, neither bone scan nor PET-CT can be used as routine screening strategies. Additionally, it was reported that tumour markers in BC are not sensitive enough to predict BM 9. Thus, studies looking into risk factors for BM in BC are warranted. A new study based on 902 patients with BC suggested the incidence of BM is 5.5% 5. That study also concluded that concentrations of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) >116 U/L, HB <37.5 g/L and calcium >2.54 mmol/L were the main risk factors that led patients with BC to develop BM 5. However, to build an accurate and portable BM-preventive system for BC, knowledge of additional common clinical risk factors was needed. Accordingly, to further summarize the epidemiological characteristics and prognosis of metastatic BC and to find more risk factors for BM, the present study was performed. National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) is an open access database that provides cancer incidence and survival data from 18 established cancer registries across the United States, comprising approximately 30% of the total US population. SEER cohort is a widely used database, with complete demographic and clinical data and long-term, high quality follow-up for assessing cancer epidemiological characteristics around the world. The SEER database was employed in the present study. The incidence and risk factors for BM with initial BC were analysed. Meanwhile, for BC patients presenting with BM at diagnosis, survival estimates and prognostic factors were summarized.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with bladder cancer were selected from the SEER programme between 2010 and 2014, because sites of metastases were not collected until 2010. The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the SEER database. (Information Management Service, Inc. Calverton, MD, USA, https://seer.cancer.gov/data/). Data on the primary site labelled “bladder cancer (C67.0-67.9)” was identified. The exclusion criteria were as follows: patients <18 years old (adult's patients); diagnosed with carcinoma in situ and benign; diagnosed at autopsy or via death certificate; unknown BM or follow-up. To identify BM risk factors, 87,750 patients within the SEER database diagnosed with BC with definite details about BM from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2014, were selected. Among those, for survival analysis, 963 BC patients with BM who were initially diagnosed between 2010 and 2013 were retrieved. (Figure 1)
Figure 1

Flow-chart of the participants' selection.

Ethnics Statement

The SEER database is an open public database, and the release of data from the SEER database does not require informed patient consent because cancer is a reportable disease in every state of the United States. The present study complied with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Statistical analysis

To determine the risk factors for developing BM at diagnosis, univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed. Patients' clinical data were collected: age (≤40, 41-60, 61-80 and ≥81 years), sex (female and male), race [white, black, AI (American Indian/Alaska Native), and API (Asian or Pacific Islander)], marital status (married and unmarried), insurance status (insured and uninsured), primary tumor (T) stage (T1, T2, T3, and T4), regional lymph node stage (N0, N1, N2 and N3), tumor differentiation grade (grade I, grade II, grade III, and grade IV), the presence or absence of lung metastases, liver metastases, or brain metastases. The primary goal of the survival analysis was to determine overall survival, defined as the time from diagnosis of BC to all causes of death. Survival rate was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the difference between survival curves was tested by log-rank test. At the same time, based on these factors, combined with the factor of surgical treatment of primary site (none or yes), a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was utilized to investigate the associations with overall survival among BC patients with BM. All the data were obtained using SEER*Stat Software version 8.3.5. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 23.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY), and all charts of survival were prepared by MedCalc 15.2.2. Two-sided P values less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

Results

Incidence of bone metastases

Based on the setting criteria, a total of 87,750 eligible patients were diagnosed with BC between 2010 and 2014; BM was found in 1.39% (1,223/87,750) of the entire cohort at initial diagnosis. In the cohort, 963 BC patients with BM were followed up for more than 1 year. (Table 1)
Table 1

Multivariate logistic regression for analysing demographic and related clinical characteristics for developing Bone Metastases in patients with initial bladder cancer (diagnosed 2010-2014).

Subject characteristicsPatients' No. of BC (2010-2014) OR (95% CI)P-value
With Bone MetastasesEntire Cohort, NIncidence(%)
Age, in years0.87(0.77-0.98)0.03
≤40108901.121(Reference)1.00
41-60257145331.771.93(0.58-6.40)0.28
60-80677499081.361.51(0.46-4.97)0.50
≥81279224191.241.25(0.38-4.17)0.71
Race1.12(1.00-1.26)0.046
White1036775121.341(Reference)1.00
Black12151242.361.55(1.18-2.02)0.001
AI72802.50.78(0.22-2.78)0.70
API5835401.641.25(0.83-1.86)0.29
Unknown112940.08NANA
Marital Status
Unmarried569295941.921(Reference)1.00
Married598505441.180.83(0.70-0.98)0.03
Unknown5676120.74NANA
Insurance Status
Insured1181862491.371(Reference)1.00
Uninsured4215012.791.20(0.67-2.17)0.54
T Stage1.66(1.53-1.81)<0.001
T1187665640.281(Reference)1.00
T2457126273.625.56(4.40-7.01)<0.001
T39034992.572.58(1.81-3.66)<0.001
T420929027.206.31(4.69-8.50)<0.001
Unknown280215812.97NANA
N Stage1.62(1.47-1.79)<0.001
N0663824250.811(Reference)1.00
N110114516.961.64(1.19-2.28)0.003
N2190184010.332.85(2.22-3.66)<0.001
N35643612.844.38(2.97-6.46)<0.001
Unknown213159813.33NANA
Grade1.72(1.53-1.93)<0.001
I1196870.111(Reference)1.00
II38152620.251.54(0.69-3.45)0.30
III261125312.084.71(2.27-9.78)<0.001
IV544271242.014.95(2.41-10.16)<0.001
Unknown369231461.59NANA
Lung Met
None846865510.981(Reference)1.00
Yes332108630.579.87(7.71-12.63)<0.001
Unknown4511339.82NANA
Liver Met
None917869121.061(Reference)1.00
Yes27477635.3110.63(7.98-14.17)<0.001
Unknown326251.61NANA
Brain Met
None1139875901.301(Reference)1.00
Yes419941.417.73(3.45-17.31)<0.001
Unknown436170.49NANA

Abbreviations: BC, bladder cancer; AI, American Indian/Alaska Native; API, Asian or Pacific Islander; Met, metastases; NA, not available; OR, odds ratio; CI, confident interval. All factors with Unknown Data were removed from Multivariable Logistic Regression model.

Risk factors for developing bone metastases

Univariate analysis showed that factors significantly associated with BM occurrence included: older age (OR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.80-0.94, P<0.001), race (OR=1.15, 95% CI: 1.06-1.24, P<0.001), marital status (OR=0.61, 95% CI: 0.55-0.69, P<0.001), insured status (OR=0.48, 95% CI: 0.35-0.66, P<0.001), higher primary tumor (T) stage (OR=2.68, 95% CI: 2.55-2.83, P<0.001), higher regional lymph node (N) stage (OR=3.24, 95% CI: 3.04-3.45, P<0.001), poor tumor differentiated grade (OR=2.09, 95% CI: 1.92-2.28, P<0.001), the presence of lung metastases (OR=44.51, 95% CI: 38.47-51.49, P<0.001), liver metastases (OR=51.11, 95% CI: 43.51-60.03, P<0.001), or brain metastases (OR=53.68, 95% CI: 35.83-80.41, P<0.001). As shown in Table 1, multivariate logistic regression suggested that factors significantly associated with BM at initial diagnosis included: age between 41 to 60 years (OR=0.87, 95% CI: 0.77-0.98, P=0.03), black race (OR=1.12, 95% CI: 1.00-1.26, P=0.046), unmarried status (OR=0.83, 95% CI: 0.70-0.98, P=0.03), higher T stage (OR=1.66, 95% CI: 1.53-1.81, P<0.001), higher N stage (OR=1.62, 95% CI: 1.47-1.79, P<0.001), poor tumor differentiated grade (OR=1.72, 95% CI: 1.53-1.93, P<0.001), and the presence of lung metastases (OR=9.87, 95% CI: 7.71-12.63, P<0.001), liver metastases (OR=10.63, 95% CI: 7.98-14.17, P<0.001), or brain metastases (OR=7.73, 95% CI: 3.45-17.31, P<0.001).

Survival and prognostic factors for BM

Once BC patients were diagnosed with BM, their survival rates were dramatically decreased. The overall 1-year survival of the cohort was 84% but it was only 21% among patients with BM. The median overall survival time for 963 BC patients with BM was only 4 months (95% CI: 3.55-4.45 months, Figure 2A), and 915 (95.02%) patients died at the end of follow-up. In the univariate analysis model, factors including older age (Figure 2B), American Indian/Alaska Native race (Figure 2C), and the presence of lung metastases (Figure 2D), liver metastases (Figure 2E), or brain metastases (Figure 2F) were negatively associated with overall survival. Conversely, surgical treatment of the primary site was found to be positively associated with overall survival rate (P<0.001, Figure 2G).
Figure 2

Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival among patients diagnosed with initial bladder cancer with bone metastases (A, overall), stratified by age (B), race (C), presence of lung metastases (D), liver metastases (E), brain metastases (F) and surgical treatments of the primary site (G). AI, American Indian/Alaska Native; API, Asian or Pacific Islander; Met, metastases; Surg, surgical treatments of primary site.

In the multivariate stepwise Cox regression model (Table 2), elder (HR=1.31, 95% CI: 1.18-1.45, P<0.001), the presence of lung metastases (HR=1.19, 95% CI: 1.02-1.40, P=0.03), liver metastases (HR=1.53, 95% CI: 1.30-1.81, P<0.001), or brain metastases (HR=1.47, 95% CI: 1.04-2.09, P=0.03) were negatively associated with overall survival; however, surgery was positively associated with overall survival (HR=0.83, 95% CI: 0.77-0.89, P<0.001).
Table 2

Multivariable Cox Regression for analysing prognostic factors for primary bladder cancer with bone metastases (diagnosed 2010-2013).

Subject characteristicsPatients' No. of BC with BMSurvival, Median (95% CI), moHR (95% CI)P-Value
Overall Dead (N, %)
Age, in years1.31(1.18-1.45)<0.001
≤4088(100.00)4(0.00-8.16)1(Reference)1.00
41-60201186(92.54)5(3.74-6.26)0.83(0.40-1.69)0.60
61-80537505(94.04)4(3.36-4.64)0.97(0.48-1.97)0.94
≥81217216(99.54)2(1.50-2.50)1.46(0.71-2.98)0.30
Race1.08(0.98-1.18)0.13
White817776(94.98)4(3.50-4.50)1(Reference)1.00
Black9590(94.74)4(3.18-4.82)1.09(0.87-1.37)0.44
AI66(100.00)0(NR)3.50(1.45-8.49)0.01
API4543(95.56)3(0.62-5.39)1.20(0.88-1.64)0.25
Lung Met
None670633(94.48)4(3.46-4.54)1(Reference)1.00
Yes257248(96.50)3(2.47-3.53)1.19(1.02-1.40)0.03
Unknown3634(94.44)NRNANA
Liver Met
None721678(94.04)4(3.51-4.49)1(Reference)1.00
Yes218214(98.17)2(1.54-2.46)1.53(1.30-1.81)<0.001
Unknown2423(95.83)NRNANA
Brain Met
None893847(94.85)4(3.54-4.46)1(Reference)1.00
Yes3434(100.00)2(1.47-2.54)1.47(1.04-2.09)0.03
Unknown3634(94.44)NRNANA
Surg(pri)
None303296(97.69)2(1.46-2.54)1(Reference)1.00
Yes658617(93.77)5(4.37-5.63)0.83(0.77-0.89)<0.001
Unknown22(100)NRNANA

Abbreviations: BC, bladder cancer; BM, bone metastases; AI, American Indian/Alaska Native; API, Asian or Pacific Islander; Met, metastases; Surg(pri), surgical treatments of primary site; NR, not reached; NA, not available; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confident interval. All factors with Unknown Data were removed from multivariable Cox regression model and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Discussion

It was reported that approximately 5% of the BC patients presented initially with metastatic disease, with bone being the second-most affected organ and it was reported to occur in 30% to 40% patients with metastatic BC 10,11. With the largest population known to date, this study looked into the incidence of BC patients with BM at diagnosis and showed 1.39% of the entire BC cohort was identified with BM at diagnosis. The identification of the risk factors for BM development in BC patients makes it possible to guide physicians in the management of the high-risk patient of developing metastasis, increase the quality of life and decrease skeletal related events. Based on our risk factors analysis, we determined that BC patients are likely being diagnosed with BM, when they present with a series of factors, including age between 41 to 60 years, black race, unmarried marital status, higher T stage, higher N stage, poor tumor grade, and the presence of lung, liver, and brain metastases, which was in line with other urinary system cancers 12-14. Accordingly, the examinations such as bone scan may be considered as an optional method for the patients with the aforementioned factors for BM development. Additionally, black race was proved to be one of the risk factors for BM at diagnosis, which was consistent with other reported cancer types 13,15,16. Previous studies also reported black patients showed higher-stage disease and worse disease-specific survival compared with white patients 17,18. Further studies looking into the potential explanations for black patients' poor survival in metastatic tumor and the access to care, quality of care and treatment plans for black BC patients with BM is warranted. In the present study, BC patients who presented with BM at diagnosis showed a marked decrease in survival rates compared with BC patients without BM occurrence, the median OS for the BM cohort was only 4 months. In the previous study, the 5-year cancer-specific survival following a diagnosis of metastatic BC was reported to be only 8% 19. Our results further proved the poor survival of BC patients with BM at diagnosis. The latest study suggested that among the three most common genitourinary neoplasms, compared with median survival times for patients with BM in prostate cancer (210 days) and kidney cancer (182 days), survival for bladder cancer (68 days) was the worst 20. Based on our prognostic factors analysis, we clarified that BC patients with BM at diagnosis were associated with a significantly higher risk of mortality when they presented with a series of factors, including advanced age, absence of surgery, and presence of lung metastases, liver metastases, and brain metastases. The effect of metastatic sites on patients' prognosis among several neoplasms was studied 21,22. Liver metastases, bone metastases, and brain metastases have been proven to be independent unfavourable prognostic factors for BC patients 23. To our knowledge, our study is the first to analyse prognostic factors for BC patients with BM. Physicians should pay more attention to their patients' presentation with the revealed factors. Early supportive treatment and intimate observation should be considered for these patients. Targeted treatment strategies and medical care should be paid on the BC patients with high risk factors for death, to prolong the survival time and implement the tertiary prevention. Further research should be performed to find more prognostic factors to build an accurate predictive system for BC patients with BM. The major limitation of the present study came from the SEER database itself, as the real BM rate in BC patients might be underestimated for nonrecording in asymptomatic cases. In addition, information on skeletal-related events, thought to be one of the most important prognostic factors in urologic malignancies, were not available. Additionally, the present study was performed based on the SEER cohort and the results were not validated by external dataset. More related studies were needed to further confirm the results in the future to validate the extrapolation of results. The incidence of BM in newly diagnosed BC patients was approximately 1.39%. BM dramatically decreased the survival of BC patients. Bone scan should be considered a routine examination for BC patients of black race at initial diagnosis. The risk and prognostic factors for BC patients with BM identified herein may provide the basis for early detection of BM in BC patients, and guide clinicians to choose targeted treatment options to promote their survival.
  11 in total

Review 1.  Bone metastases from urothelial carcinoma. The dark side of the moon.

Authors:  Marco Stellato; Daniele Santini; Maria Concetta Cursano; Simone Foderaro; Giuseppe Tonini; Giuseppe Procopio
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 4.072

2.  Racial differences in the distribution of bladder cancer metastases: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Rosiello; Carlotta Palumbo; Marina Deuker; Lara Franziska Stolzenbach; Thomas Martin; Zhe Tian; Andrea Gallina; Francesco Montorsi; Peter Black; Wassim Kassouf; Shahrokh F Shariat; Fred Saad; Alberto Briganti; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2020-10-31

3.  Primary tumor surgery improves survival of cancer patients with synchronous solitary bone metastasis: a large population-based study.

Authors:  Wei Wu; Honghua Zhang; Zhong Fang; Feng Li
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-01

4.  The prognostic impact of bone metastasis in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Husam A Alqaisi; Carlos Stecca; Zachary W Veitch; Jamila Riromar; Jeenan Kaiser; Nazanin Fallah-Rad; Di Maria Jiang; Scott North; Sunil Samnani; Nimira Alimohamed; Srikala S Sridhar
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 5.485

5.  Analysis of Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Factors for Bone Metastasis in Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Jin Zhang; Wenjuan Ma; Haixiao Wu; Jun Wang; Yile Lin; Xin Wang; Chao Zhang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-12-10

6.  Patterns of distant metastases in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma--A population-based analysis.

Authors:  Jianxin Xue; Wensun Chen; Wenbo Xu; Zicheng Xu; Xiao Li; Feng Qi; Zengjun Wang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 4.452

7.  The role of surgery on the primary tumor site in bladder cancer with distant metastasis: significance of histology type and metastatic pattern.

Authors:  Ping Wang; Shuang Zang; Guangqi Li; Weiling Qu; Shuyao Li; Qiao Qiao; Yuanjun Jiang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 4.452

8.  Adjuvant radiotherapy may have significant survival benefits for gastric cancer patients with 1-29 lymph nodes retrieved.

Authors:  Siyi Wu; Yuxin Chu; Qinyong Hu; Qibin Song
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.241

9.  Development and validation of a nomogram to predict survival in patients with metastatic testicular germ cell tumors.

Authors:  Dong-Dong Yu; Dong Hui; Wei-Kang Chen; Yun-Bei Xiao; Zhi-Gang Wu; Qin-Quan Wang; Chao-Feng Zhou; Zhi-Xia Chen; Cheng-Di Li; Jian Cai
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.241

10.  Risk factors and nomogram for newly diagnosis of bone metastasis in bladder cancer: A SEER-based study.

Authors:  Zhiyi Fan; Zhangheng Huang; Chuan Hu; Yuexin Tong; Chengliang Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.