Literature DB >> 30587901

Potential and safety tests of egg drop syndrome candidate vaccine from Medan isolate, Indonesia.

Gusti Ayu Yuniati Kencana1, Nyoman Suartha2, I Made Kardena3, Gusti Ayu Mayani Kristina Dewi4, Arini Nurhandayani5, Kadek Karang Agustina6.   

Abstract

AIM: The study was aimed to prepare and examine the potential and safety concerns of egg drop syndrome (EDS) vaccine candidate seed. The potential and safety trials of EDS Medan isolate vaccine need to be done before commercial scale of EDS vaccines are made.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The safety test of EDS candidate vaccine was tested on 4-week-old specified pathogen-free chickens in an experimentally isolated enclosure.
RESULTS: The result of the safety test obtained 27.3 hemagglutination inhibition (HI) unit of geometric mean titer antibody post-vaccination. However, the potency test of the EDS candidate vaccine was conducted on 17-week-old laying hens. Test results of the EDS potency vaccine in layer obtained antibody titer increased in every week of blood taking with average titer of antibody: Before vaccinated was 22.9 HI unit, 1 week after vaccination was 23.7 HI unit, 2 weeks post-vaccination was 25 HI unit, and 3 weeks after vaccination was 27.3 HI units. In contrast, decreasing trend was observed in control group (unvaccinated chicken).
CONCLUSION: Serologically, the seed vaccine of EDS virus isolates from Medan was able to produce protective antibody titers starting in the 2nd and 3rd weeks post-vaccination.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medan isolate; hemagglutination; inhibition test; safety and potential test; seed of egg drop syndrome vaccine

Year:  2018        PMID: 30587901      PMCID: PMC6303488          DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2018.1637-1640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet World        ISSN: 0972-8988


Introduction

Egg drop syndrome (EDS) is a disease caused by the duck adenovirus belonging to family Adenoviridae and genus of Atadenovirus. The virus was 1st time discovered in 1976 in the Netherlands [1]. Therefore, it was called EDS - 1976 and later on abbreviated to EDS-76 [2]. Adenovirus particles are icosahedral in structure with 70-90 nm in diameter [3]. Virus particles are composed of 252 capsomers of triangular form. The genome of EDS 1976 is linear and composed of double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA). Adenovirus is reported resistant to pH 3-9 but can be inactivated with 1:1000 formalin. Some strains of adenovirus can survive at 60-70°C for 30 min. The F1 strain can survive up to 56°C for 18 h. In Group I adenovirus, only F1 strain can agglutinate the red blood cells [4,5]. EDS is a viral disease of layer birds, found mainly during peak production causing high economic losses [6,7]. EDS mainly attacks layers that are in the reproductive ages of 25-26 weeks [8]. Ducks and geese are reservoirs of the EDS virus and are the sources of virus transmissions through contaminated water [9]. The EDS disease is characterized by specific symptoms of decrease in the quality and quantity of eggs during peak production. Low egg quality is characterized by small size egg with mushy eggshell which can be easily broken (Figure-1) [10,11], which leads farmers to huge economic losses. EDS virus initially infected breeding farms and later on spread to other farms through infected eggs [12]. Adenovirus has become endemic in various parts of the world including Indonesia. It is a strategic infectious disease that must be eradicated [13]. EDS can be prevented by vaccination of layer before laying. In Indonesia, EDS vaccination has been adopted by several farmers, but EDS outbreak is still reported from layer birds [11].
Figure-1

(a) Normal egg and (b) Egg drop syndrome egg abnormalities (personal archive).

(a) Normal egg and (b) Egg drop syndrome egg abnormalities (personal archive). For this purpose, isolation and characterization of EDS virus from field isolate are required. Isolate Medan used as seed vaccine taken from commercial poultry farms in Medan that shows the clinical symptoms of decreased egg production with a flabby shell [11]. With such an assumption, the vaccine made from local seed virus would be more appropriated if it used to prevent EDS epidemic in Indonesia. This study was carried out to test the potential and safety of vaccines derived from local isolates.

Materials and Methods

Ethical approval

This research was accepted in the Ethical Commission for the Use of Animals in Research and Education of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Udayana University, Indonesia with Ref. No. 297a/KE-PH/VII/2017.

EDS vaccine candidate

EDS isolates came from the city of Medan (Indonesia), which was taken from the field case of laying hens with EDS clinical symptoms. Samples of isolates were taken from the uterus and oviducts, isolated in 11-day-old spotted duck eggs. Inoculated for 3 days and then harvested, the allantoic liquid was tested by hemagglutination (HA) and polymerase chain reaction tests. The HA test results of the viral titers were 212 HA units, and DNA amplification was 500 bp [11]. The EDS isolates of Medan were subsequently inactivated, emulsified, and used as EDS vaccine seeds. Safety test for EDS vaccine candidate was performed on specified pathogen-free (SPF) chickens in the experimental cage at PT. Sanbio Laboratories, while the potential test was done on commercial layer at the Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Udayana University. The safety test of the EDS vaccine candidate was performed in 10 SPF chickens of 4-week-old vaccinated by injecting one dose in thigh muscles with EDS vaccine candidate. 10 other SPF chickens were used as controls. The content of EDS virus for vaccine candidates was made by conducting double-fold serial dilutions starting from titers 21 to 220 to be formulated into 215 HA units as requirements for candidate vaccines based on Indonesian Medicine Federation standards. The 215 HA units were calculated by the HA test. The vaccine manufacturing process begins with adding 70% of the oil phase (adjuvant) to inactivated EDS virus isolates into the mixing tank, followed by the addition of 30% water phase, emulsified to homogeneous. The volume of vaccine candidates injected into SPF chickens was 0.5 ml containing 215 HA units, while the control was injected with 0.5 ml phosphate-buffered saline. Observation of the safety test of the EDS vaccine candidate was conducted for 2 weeks. Seed vaccine was said to be eligible if all the treated and control groups of the chickens remained alive and well during the study period. The potency test of EDS vaccine candidate was done at the Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Udayana University. A total of 50 layers were used for the research purpose. Vaccination was performed on 18-week-old layers with one dose (0.5 ml) of intramuscular vaccine in thigh muscles. Blood sampling for serum was performed for 4 times: The 1st time before vaccination and later on 3 times was performed every week after post-vaccination up to the 4th week. Every day, the clinical symptoms are observed, and at the end of the study, all chickens were killed to observe their gross pathological changes. The antibody titers were tested by HA reaction and inhibition-based serological test (HA/hemagglutination inhibition [HI]) [14-16]. These tests were performed at Virology Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Udayana University. The antibody titers obtained were statistically analyzed using ANOVA test [17].

Results and Discussion

The result of the research of Medan isolate showed that the seeds of EDS vaccine used in Medan isolate did not cause clinical symptoms in the chickens. Thus, it can be concluded that the EDS vaccine seed isolate Medan is safe to be used. Serologic test results with HA resistance from vaccinated SPF serum showed a mean of the titer of geometric mean titer antibody of 27.3 with the lowest titer of 25 HI unit, while the highest titer was 210 HI unit. Unlike the antibody titer of non-vaccinated control chicken, the HA test results showed zero titer (Table-1). This proves that the Medan EDS virus isolates are safe to be used as EDS vaccine seeds.
Table-1

Antibody titer of SPF chickens post-vaccination of EDS seed vaccine.

GroupTotal sampleTiter HI microtiter (Log2)Mean (Log2)Min (Log2)Max (Log2)GMTCoefficient of the variation (%)

EDS
01234567891011
124816326412825651210242048
EDS vaccine1001232117.351015820
Control10000010

SPF=Specific pathogen free, EDS=Egg drop syndrome, GMT=Geometric mean titter, HI=Hemagglutination inhibition

Antibody titer of SPF chickens post-vaccination of EDS seed vaccine. SPF=Specific pathogen free, EDS=Egg drop syndrome, GMT=Geometric mean titter, HI=Hemagglutination inhibition Potency test of EDS vaccine seeds in commercial laying chickens vaccinated at 17 weeks, produced an antibody titer that increased in every week post-vaccination. Serologically, the EDS vaccine candidate of Medan isolates is eligible for EDS vaccine because it was able to produce antibody titer of 27.3 HI units in layer vaccinated at 17 weeks (Figure-2). The antibody titer result was protective antibody titer because it was > 24 HI units. Bidin et al. [18] reported on EDS-vaccinated chickens at 18 weeks of age to produce antibody titers of 16-256 HI units or 24-28 HI units in 96.7% of the samples. The increase of EDS antibody titer in this study is also similar to the results of vaccination with the commercial vaccine Shanvac ND-IB-EDS in commercial laying hen farms that were capable to trigger antibody titer of 27 HI units for 3-week post-vaccination period [19].
Figure-2

The increased titer of egg drop syndrome antibody in laying hens before and after vaccination.

The increased titer of egg drop syndrome antibody in laying hens before and after vaccination. The result of analysis variance showed that vaccine administration had a significant effect on chicken antibody titer (p<0.05). The time of blood taking had a significant effect on chicken antibody titer (p<0.05). There was also a significant association between timing of vaccination and serum collection (Table-2). While the antibody titer in the control group of chicken decreased during maintenance period. This may be due to the presence of maternal antibodies due to vaccination in the mother [20,21] and can also result from non-specific infections that reduce general immunity [22].
Table-2

Effects of the vaccination on antibody against EDS in the commercial laying chickens.

SourceType III sum of squaresdfMean squareFSignificant
Intercept
 Hypothesis1994.42511994.425434.6040.000
 Error220.275484.589a
Treatment
 Hypothesis93.845193.84520.4500.000
 Error220.275484.589a
Treatment*repetition
 Hypothesis220.275484.5891.4570.047
 Error453.5751443.150b
Time
 Hypothesis59.265319.7556.2720.000
 Error453.5751443.150b
Treatment*time
 Hypothesis164.705354.90217.4300.000
 Error453.5751443.150b

Dependent variable: Antibody titer of laying chickens post-vaccination of EDS seed vaccine. EDS=Egg drop syndrome

Effects of the vaccination on antibody against EDS in the commercial laying chickens. Dependent variable: Antibody titer of laying chickens post-vaccination of EDS seed vaccine. EDS=Egg drop syndrome Clinical observation results in post-vaccinated chickens with EDS isolate Medan did not experience any clinical sign. The chickens that got vaccination by EDS isolates Medan vaccine candidate produced eggs with normal in shape, size, and production. Unlike the infected chickens, EDS caused low-quality eggs such as thin eggshells and around 10-30% decline in egg production [23]. In experimental infections, respiratory distress occurs in the 3-4 days post-infection period with a 10-40% decrease in production, but no death was observed [9].

Conclusion

Based on the results of the experimental test of Medan isolate EDS candidate vaccine in SPF chickens or in layers, it can be concluded that EDS vaccine is safe to be used as a vaccine against EDS. Seeds of EDS vaccine Medan isolates may trigger protective antibody formation from 2-week post-vaccination with antibody titers of 25 HI units and 27.3 HI units for 3-weeks post-vaccination. Further, research on EDS Medan vaccine isolates is needed to be used as EDS vaccine and its effect on production in commercial chicken farms. The challenge infection by virulent EDS virus post-vaccination is not done in the present study, but we wish to do it in the future.

Authors’ Contributions

GAYK: Plan, conduct research, and write a script. NS: Perform serological tests and test vaccine potential. IMK: Potential test, data analysis, and write a script, GAMKD: Maintain and supervise experimental chickens. AN: Virus isolation and vaccine safety test. S: Virus isolation and vaccine safety test. KKA: Data analysis and write a script. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Avian adenoviruses.

Authors:  J B McFerran; J A Smyth
Journal:  Rev Sci Tech       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.181

Review 2.  The long view: a selective review of 40 years of Newcastle disease research.

Authors:  Dennis J Alexander; Elizabeth W Aldous; Chad M Fuller
Journal:  Avian Pathol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.378

3.  Proposed method for agglutinating antibody titer analysis and its use as indicator of acquired immunity in pacu, Piaractus mesopotamicus.

Authors:  J D Biller-Takahashi; H J Montassier; L S Takahashi; E C Urbinati
Journal:  Braz J Biol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.651

4.  Passive antibody transfer in chickens to model maternal antibody after avian influenza vaccination.

Authors:  Olivia B Faulkner; Carlos Estevez; Qingzhong Yu; David L Suarez
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 2.046

Review 5.  Latest insights on adenovirus structure and assembly.

Authors:  Carmen San Martín
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 5.048

6.  Duck egg-drop syndrome caused by BYD virus, a new Tembusu-related flavivirus.

Authors:  Jingliang Su; Shuang Li; Xudong Hu; Xiuling Yu; Yongyue Wang; Peipei Liu; Xishan Lu; Guozhong Zhang; Xueying Hu; Di Liu; Xiaoxia Li; Wenliang Su; Hao Lu; Ngai Shing Mok; Peiyi Wang; Ming Wang; Kegong Tian; George F Gao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Intranasal administration of inactivated avian influenza virus of H5N1 subtype vaccine-induced systemic immune response in chicken and mice.

Authors:  I N Suartha; G A A Suartini; I W Wirata; N M A R K Dewi; G N N Putra; G A Y Kencana; G N Mahardika
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2018-02-20

8.  Determination of the optimal time of vaccination against infectious bursal disease virus (Gumboro) in Algeria.

Authors:  Omar Besseboua; Abdelhanine Ayad; Hama Benbarek
Journal:  Onderstepoort J Vet Res       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 1.792

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Fiber Protein Produced in Escherichia coli as a Subunit Vaccine Candidate Against Egg-Drop Syndrome 76.

Authors:  Linguo Wang; Pantao Zhang; Baicheng Huang; Mengyue Wang; Hui Tian; Peng Liu; Wujie Liu; Kegong Tian
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-02-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.