Literature DB >> 30587304

Evaluating the Correlation and Performance of PROMIS to SRS Questionnaires in Adult and Pediatric Spinal Deformity Patients.

David N Bernstein1, M Owen Papuga2, James O Sanders1, Paul T Rubery1, Emmanuel N Menga1, Addisu Mesfin3.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional cohort analysis.
OBJECTIVES: 1) To assess the correlation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Management Information System (PROMIS) domains with SRS-22r/SRS-30 domains in all scoliosis patients; 2) to assess the correlation of PROMIS domains with SRS-30 domains in adult scoliosis patients; 3) to assess the correlation of PROMIS domains with SRS-22r/SRS-30 domains in pediatric scoliosis patients; and 4) to assess ceiling and floor effects of PROMIS and SRS-22r/SRS-30 domains. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Studies evaluating correlations between PROMIS and a number of legacy PRO tools have been conducted. To our knowledge, no literature exists examining the correlation of PROMIS and SRS questionnaires in adult and pediatric spinal deformity patients.
METHODS: Outpatient visits from July 2015 to December 2017 with concurrent PROMIS and SRS questionnaires were analyzed. Pediatric patients completed the SRS-22r, whereas adults completed the SRS-30. PROMIS measured Physical Function/Mobility, Pain Interference, and Depression domains. Spearman correlation coefficients (ρ) were calculated. Ceiling and floor effects were calculated and compared.
RESULTS: 227 (164 adult; 64 pediatric) patient visits representing 173 patients were included. Moderate to strong correlation existed between PROMIS Physical Function/Mobility and SRS Function/Activity (F/A) domains (ρ, range 0.59-0.84; p < .001). PROMIS Pain Interference and SRS Pain domains showed strong-moderate to strong correlation (ρ, range -0.68 to -0.83; p < .001). PROMIS Depression and SRS Mental Health (MH) domains demonstrated strong-moderate to strong correlation (ρ, range -0.67 to -0.80; p < .001). Ceiling and floor effects were all less in PROMIS domains (range, 0.44% to 0.88%) compared with SRS domains (range, 0.88% to 17.62%).
CONCLUSIONS: PROMIS Physical Function/Mobility, Pain Interference, and Depression domains correlate well with SRS F/A, Pain, and MH. SRS SI/A and Satisfaction are not as well captured. PROMIS showed better ceiling and floor effects than SRS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Copyright © 2018 Scoliosis Research Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PROMIS; Patient-reported outcomes; SRS questionnaire; Spinal deformity; Value-based healthcare

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30587304     DOI: 10.1016/j.jspd.2018.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine Deform        ISSN: 2212-134X


  9 in total

Review 1.  State-of-the-art: outcome assessment in adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Gum; Leah Y Carreon; Steven D Glassman
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2020-10-09

2.  Time to Completion of Pediatric PROMIS Computerized Adaptive Testing Measures and the SRS-22r in an Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Population.

Authors:  Chinmay S Paranjape; Olivia B de Araujo; Lisa M Reider; Paul D Sponseller; Anthony R Carlini; Kevin McLaughlin; Keith R Bachmann; Stuart L Mitchell
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Construct Validity of Pediatric PROMIS Computerized Adaptive Testing Measures in Children With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Stuart L Mitchell; Kevin H McLaughlin; Keith R Bachmann; Paul D Sponseller; Lisa M Reider
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Psychometric Properties of the Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire (Version 22r) Domains Among Adults With Spinal Deformity: A Rasch Measurement Theory Analysis.

Authors:  Kati Kyrölä; Susanna Hiltunen; Mikko M Uimonen; Jari Ylinen; Arja Häkkinen; Jussi P Repo
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-05-15

5.  Health-related quality of life measures in adult spinal deformity: can we replace the SRS-22 with PROMIS?

Authors:  Peter G Passias; Katherine E Pierce; Oscar Krol; Tyler Williamson; Sara Naessig; Waleed Ahmad; Lara Passfall; Peter Tretiakov; Bailey Imbo; Rachel Joujon-Roche; Jordan Lebovic; Stephane Owusu-Sarpong; Kevin Moattari; Nicholas A Kummer; Constance Maglaras; Brooke K O'Connell; Bassel G Diebo; Shaleen Vira; Renaud Lafage; Virginie Lafage; Aaron J Buckland; Themistocles Protopsaltis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.721

6.  CORR Insights®: Is There an Association Between Psychiatric Disorders and Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis? A Large-database Study.

Authors:  Keith R Gabriel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 4.755

7.  Appropriate Opioid Use After Spine Surgery: Psychobehavioral Barriers and Patient Knowledge.

Authors:  Rafa Rahman; Sara Wallam; Bo Zhang; Rahul Sachdev; Emmanuel L McNeely; Khaled M Kebaish; Lee H Riley; David B Cohen; Amit Jain; Sang H Lee; Daniel M Sciubba; Richard L Skolasky; Brian J Neuman
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 2.210

8.  Floor and Ceiling Effects, Time to Completion, and Question Burden of PROMIS CAT Domains Among Shoulder and Knee Patients Undergoing Nonoperative and Operative Treatment.

Authors:  Caleb M Gulledge; D Grace Smith; Alexander Ziedas; Stephanie J Muh; Vasilios Moutzouros; Eric C Makhni
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2019-12-05

9.  Patients With Lower Limb Deformity Report Worse Quality of Life Than Control Subjects Regardless of Degree of Deformity.

Authors:  Madison R Heath; Tom J Shin; Rena Mehta; Peter S Principe; Alexandra T Mackie; Austin Fragomen; S Robert Rozbruch; Peter D Fabricant
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2021-08-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.