Literature DB >> 30586643

Surgical Site Infection after Primary Closure of High-Risk Surgical Wounds in Emergency General Surgery Laparotomy and Closed Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy.

Chad Hall1, Justin Regner1, Stephen Abernathy1, Claire Isbell1, Travis Isbell1, Stan Kurek1, Randall Smith1, Richard Frazee2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that the universal adoption of closed wounds with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in emergency general surgery patients would result in low superficial surgical infection (SSI) rates. STUDY
DESIGN: We performed a retrospective observational study using primary wound closure with external NPWT, from May 2017 to May 2018. Patients with active soft tissue infection of the abdominal wall were excluded. Data were analyzed by Fisher's exact tests and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests, with significance is set at a value of p < 0.05.
RESULTS: Eighty-five patients (53% female) with a median age of 65 years (range 19 to 98 years) underwent laparotomies. Four patients were excluded for active soft tissue infection. Wounds were classified as dirty (n = 18), contaminated (n = 52), and clean contaminated (n = 11). Median BMI was 27 kg/m2 (interquartile range [IQR] 23.4 to 33.0 kg/m2). Median antibiotic therapy was 4 days (IQR 1 to 7 days). Twenty-six patients had open abdomen management. Patient follow-up was a median of 20 days (range 14 to 120 days). Six patients (7%) developed superficial SSI requiring conversion to open wound management. No patients developed fascial dehiscence. There were no statistically significant associations between SSI and wound class (p = 0.072), antibiotic duration (p = 0.702), open abdomen management, or preoperative risk factors (p < 0.1). Overall morbidity was 38% and mortality was 6%.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary closure of high risk incisions combined with NPWT is associated with acceptably low SSI rates. Due to the low morbidity and decreased cost associated with this technique, primary closure with NPWT should replace open wound management in the emergency general surgery population.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30586643     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  3 in total

1.  Effects of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Wound Dehiscence and Surgical Site Infection Following Instrumented Spinal Fusion Surgery-A Single Surgeon's Experience.

Authors:  Ryan M Naylor; Hannah E Gilder; Nikita Gupta; Thomas C Hydrick; Joshua R Labott; David J Mauler; Taylor P Trentadue; Brandon Ghislain; Benjamin D Elder; Jeremy L Fogelson
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.104

2.  Closed incision negative pressure wound therapy versus standard dressings in obese women undergoing caesarean section: multicentre parallel group randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Brigid M Gillespie; Joan Webster; David Ellwood; Lukman Thalib; Jennifer A Whitty; Kassam Mahomed; Vicki Clifton; Sailesh Kumar; Adam Wagner; Evelyn Kang; Wendy Chaboyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2021-05-05

Review 3.  Clinical Applications and Benefits of Using Closed-incision Negative Pressure Therapy with Novel Dressing: A Review Article.

Authors:  Dennis Adjepong; Bilal Haider Malik
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-02-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.