Literature DB >> 30585936

Comparison of Fellow Eyes of Acute Primary Angle Closure and Phacomorphic Angle Closure.

Sasan Moghimi1,2, Navid Fathollahzadeh2, Rebecca Chen3, Shan C Lin4, Robert N Weinreb1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare anterior segment parameters in fellow eyes of acute primary angle closure (APAC) and fellow eyes of phacomorphic angle closure (AC) and to identify parameters that could be used to differentiate fellow eyes of the 2 entities.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 55 unaffected fellow eyes of APAC, 48 unaffected fellow eyes of phacomorphic AC, and 52 eyes of control subjects. All patients underwent anterior segment optical coherence tomography imaging. Anterior chamber depth, anterior chamber area, anterior chamber width (ACW), iris thickness (IT), iris curvature, lens vault (LV), and angle parameters including angle-opening distance (AOD750) were measured in qualified images using customized software and compared among the groups using a linear mixed model.
RESULTS: Fellow eyes of APAC had the smallest axial length, AOD, anterior chamber depth, anterior chamber area, ACW, and the greatest LV, and IT (P≤0.002 for all), followed by fellow eyes of phacomorphic AC, after adjustment for age, sex, and pupil diameter. IT and curvature were comparable between fellow eyes of phacomorphic AC and controls. Angle parameters had the highest area of the receiver-operator characteristic curve for discrimination of fellow eyes of APAC eyes and phacomorphic AC (0.795, P=0.001 for AOD750). In a multivariable analysis, AOD750<0.161 µm [odds ratio (OR), 23.43; P=0.001], LV>768.6 µm (OR, 16.76; P=0.001), ACW<11.07 mm (OR, 8.93; P=0.023) and younger age (P=0.001) were the factors that discriminated fellow eyes of APAC from phacomorphic AC.
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in ocular biometric parameters can be detected between fellow eyes of APAC and phacomorphic AC. Narrower angle, more anteriorly displaced lens, and thicker iris are the main parameters that distinguish fellow eyes of APAC and phacomorphic AC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30585936     DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  5 in total

1.  Accuracy of different lens power calculation formulas in patients with phacomorphic glaucoma.

Authors:  Seyed Ali Tabatabaei; Melika Samadi; Mohammad Soleimani; Hosein Fonoodi; Sepideh Ghods; Bahman Inanloo
Journal:  Taiwan J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-13

2.  Lens-vault analysis and its correlation with other biometric parameters using swept-source OCT.

Authors:  Pedro Tañá-Rivero; Ramón Ruiz-Mesa; Salvador Aguilar-Córcoles; Cristina Tello-Elordi; María Ramos-Alzamora; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2021-11-01

3.  Diagnostic Performance of Optical Coherence Tomography and Nonspecialist Gonioscopy to Detect Angle Closure.

Authors:  Bruno Lb Esporcatte; Roberto M Vessani; Luiz As Melo; Norton S Yanagimori; Guilherme H Bufarah; Norma Allemann; Ivan M Tavares
Journal:  J Curr Glaucoma Pract       Date:  2022 Jan-Apr

4.  Classifications of Qualitative Characteristics on Angle Configurations via Ultrasound Biomicroscopy in Acute Primary Angle Closure.

Authors:  Fenglei Wang; Dabo Wang; Ling Wang
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 3.829

5.  Aphakic Pupillary Block by an Intact Anterior Vitreous Membrane after Total Lens Extraction by Phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Michihiro Kono; Akiko Ishida; Sho Ichioka; Masato Matsuo; Hiroshi Shimizu; Masaki Tanito
Journal:  Case Rep Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-11-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.