Nathan Wilson1, Jin Joo Lee1, Bei Bei2. 1. Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, 18 Innovation Walk, Clayton Campus, Victoria 3800, Australia. 2. Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, 18 Innovation Walk, Clayton Campus, Victoria 3800, Australia. Electronic address: bei.bei@monash.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: New parents are vulnerable to fatigue and depressive symptoms. Many studies have reported significant positive correlations between the two in postpartum parents, but the size of correlations varies considerably between studies. The relationship between postpartum fatigue and depression is yet to be systematically synthesized and meta-analyzed. METHODS: A PROSPERO registered systematic review and meta-analysis (CRD42017065240) was conducted on the correlation between fatigue and depression within the first two years postpartum in parents. Moderation analysis was used to examine the influence of demographic and measurement factors on the effect sizes. RESULTS: Thirty-five eligible papers were identified (34 on mothers, 1 on fathers). The meta-analytic summary effect size for simultaneously measured fatigue and depressive symptoms among women in the postpartum period was r = 0.52, 95% CI [0.45, 0.59], p < .001. There was a high degree of heterogeneity in the strength of the correlation between studies. This heterogeneity was not accounted for by demographic (e.g., infant age, maternal age, population type) or methodology (e.g., measurement) related moderators. LIMITATIONS: Studies not reporting or providing correlation between fatigue and depression were not included. Unable to assess some moderators due to limited sample size. CONCLUSIONS: There is a strong correlation between fatigue and depressive symptoms among women in the first two years after child-birth, but a high degree of heterogeneity in correlation strength exists between studies. Careful assessment of both fatigue and depression when either symptom is reported could facilitate accurate differential diagnosis and prioritizing treatment in postpartum women. Further implications for assessment, treatment, and future research are discussed.
BACKGROUND: New parents are vulnerable to fatigue and depressive symptoms. Many studies have reported significant positive correlations between the two in postpartum parents, but the size of correlations varies considerably between studies. The relationship between postpartum fatigue and depression is yet to be systematically synthesized and meta-analyzed. METHODS: A PROSPERO registered systematic review and meta-analysis (CRD42017065240) was conducted on the correlation between fatigue and depression within the first two years postpartum in parents. Moderation analysis was used to examine the influence of demographic and measurement factors on the effect sizes. RESULTS: Thirty-five eligible papers were identified (34 on mothers, 1 on fathers). The meta-analytic summary effect size for simultaneously measured fatigue and depressive symptoms among women in the postpartum period was r = 0.52, 95% CI [0.45, 0.59], p < .001. There was a high degree of heterogeneity in the strength of the correlation between studies. This heterogeneity was not accounted for by demographic (e.g., infant age, maternal age, population type) or methodology (e.g., measurement) related moderators. LIMITATIONS: Studies not reporting or providing correlation between fatigue and depression were not included. Unable to assess some moderators due to limited sample size. CONCLUSIONS: There is a strong correlation between fatigue and depressive symptoms among women in the first two years after child-birth, but a high degree of heterogeneity in correlation strength exists between studies. Careful assessment of both fatigue and depression when either symptom is reported could facilitate accurate differential diagnosis and prioritizing treatment in postpartum women. Further implications for assessment, treatment, and future research are discussed.
Authors: Bridget Armstrong; R Glenn Weaver; Michael W Beets; Truls Østbye; Richard M Kravitz; Sara E Benjamin-Neelon Journal: J Dev Behav Pediatr Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 2.988
Authors: Nathan Wilson; Karen Wynter; Clare Anderson; Shanthakumar M W Rajaratnam; Jane Fisher; Bei Bei Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2019-01-29 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Annika Gunst; My Sundén; Riikka Korja; Amy M Boddy; Jennifer Kotler; E Juulia Paavonen; Henna-Maria Uusitupa; Linnea Karlsson; Hasse Karlsson; Jan Antfolk Journal: Evol Med Public Health Date: 2021-01-02
Authors: Ryan Chow; Eileen Huang; Allen Li; Sophie Li; Sarah Y Fu; Jin S Son; Warren G Foster Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Sandra P Zoubovsky; Sarah Hoseus; Shivani Tumukuntala; Jay O Schulkin; Michael T Williams; Charles V Vorhees; Louis J Muglia Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2020-01-16 Impact factor: 6.222