| Literature DB >> 30584446 |
Fahimeh Ramezani Tehrani1, Samira Behboudi-Gandevani1, Marzieh Rostami Dovom1, Maryam Farahmand1, Sonia Minooee1, Mahsa Noroozzadeh1, Mina Amiri1, Sima Nazarpour1, Fereidoun Azizi2.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Reproductive domains of the Tehran lipid and glucose study (TLGS) are unique in that they provide reliable information on reproduction of an urban population of West Asia. The aim of this review is to present the most important reproductive findings of TLGS. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: This review is summarizing all articles published in the context of reproductive aspects of TLGS results over the 20-year follow-up. A comprehensive databases search was conducted in PubMed (including Medline), Web of Science and Scopus for retrieving articles on the reproductive histories in context of the TLGS.Entities:
Keywords: Reproductive Histories; Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study
Year: 2018 PMID: 30584446 PMCID: PMC6289318 DOI: 10.5812/ijem.84786
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Endocrinol Metab ISSN: 1726-913X
Figure 1.Percentages of family planning methods used by couples based on age groups in the first phase of the Tehran Lipid and Glucose
Prevalence Percentages of Women by Contraceptive Use, Based on TLGS Phase
| Year | N | Modern, n (%) | Traditional[ | None, n (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pill | IUD | Female Sterilization | Male Sterilization | Condom | Injection | Total | ||||
|
| 2506 | 377 (15) | 433 (17.2) | 228 (9) | 214 (8.5) | 275 (10.9) | 14 (0.5) | 1541 (61.4) | 645 (25.7) | 320 (12.7) |
|
| 2529 | 323 (12.7) | 385 (15.2) | 214 (8.4) | 226 (8.9) | 385 (15.2) | 10 (0.3) | 1543 (61) | 778 (30.7) | 208 (8.2) |
|
| 2594 | 248 (9.5) | 323 (12.4) | 181 (6.9) | 216 (8.3) | 519 (20) | 10 (0.3) | 1497 (57.7) | 849 (32.7) | 248 (8) |
|
| 2525 | 153 (6) | 198 (7.8) | 172 (6.8) | 203 (8) | 553 (21.9) | 10 (0.3) | 1289 (51) | 874 (34.6) | 362 (14.3) |
a Rhythmic, withdrawal or periodic abstinence.
Figure 2.Survivor function (95% CI) using Kaplan-Meier analysis between GDM and non-GDM groups. Upper line: (non-GDM) non-gestational diabetes mellitus group; Lower line: (GDM) gestational diabetes mellitus group
Figure 3.Probability pattern of dyslipidemia incidence within follow-ups. - - -: Non-gestational diabetes mellitus group; ___: Gestational diabetes mellitus group