Literature DB >> 30584402

Serum Cystatin C Levels in COPD: Potential Diagnostic Value and Relation between Respiratory Functions.

Selda Telo1, Mutlu Kuluöztürk2, Figen Deveci3, Gamze Kırkıl3, Önsel Öner3, Dilara Kaman1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the level of serum cystatin C (CysC) in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) during exacerbation and stable periods and to investigate its potential diagnostic value and the relationship between CysC levels and the pulmonary function test (PFT).
METHODS: One hundred twenty-six patients with COPD (68 in stable periods, 58 during exacerbation periods) and 50 healthy subjects were included in the study. PFT, body mass index (BMI), white blood cell counts, C-reactive protein (CRP), serum urea and creatinine levels were evaluated in both groups of patients. CysC levels were measured in all participants.
RESULTS: Serum CysC levels were statistically higher in both COPD groups than the control group (p<0.001 for both) although there was no statistically significant difference between COPD groups (p>0.05). CysC levels showed negative correlation with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and a positive correlation with C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in patients with stable COPD. There was a positive correlation between serum CysC levels and serum urea, creatinine, CRP levels in patients with COPD exacerbation (r=0.333, p=0.011; r=0.260, p=0.049; r=0.414, p<0.01 respectively). When stable COPD and control groups were evaluated, serum CysC had an area under the curve (AUC) in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.951 (0.909-0.994 95% CI: p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that CysC levels increased in both COPD groups. Increased CysC levels may be related with lung function decline and inflammation in COPD patients. In addition, CysC levels may be a potential indicator for the diagnosis of COPD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COPD; cystatin C; pulmonary function

Year:  2018        PMID: 30584402      PMCID: PMC6298476          DOI: 10.1515/jomb-2017-0064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Biochem        ISSN: 1452-8266            Impact factor:   3.402


Introduction

There is a prominent inflammatory response and protease/antiprotease imbalance in COPD. Also, persistent low-grade systemic inflammation, such as increased blood leukocytes, CRP, and inflammatory cytokines, are shown in COPD patients. COPD exacerbations are associated with both airway and systemic inflammation and increased inflammatory markers are most likely associated with lung function decline (1). The protease/antiprotease hypothesis suggests that the pathogenesis of COPD and emphysema is due to an imbalance between enzymes that degrade the extracellular matrix within the lung and proteins that protect against this proteolytic activity (2). Cystatin C (CysC) is the most important inhibitor of endogenous cysteine proteases. CysC forms complexes with cathepsins and regulates protease secretion or leakage from the lysosomes of dying or diseased cells (3). Increased CysC level was found in patients with clinical or subclinical emphysema, inflammatory lung disease and chronic kidney disease (4, 5, 6, 7). However, association between CysC levels and lung function and its potential diagnostic value in COPD are not fully understood. We aimed to assess CysC levels in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD and compare them with the stable phase of COPD patients. Also, we aimed to determine the relation between CysC and several parameters (PFT, CRP, serum urea and creatinine) in COPD patients.

Materials and Methods

Study population

Ethical approval was obtained by the institutional review board (14062016-11/15). One hundred twenty-six patients with COPD (68 stable patients who were admitted to our outpatient clinics for control and 58 COPD patients during an exacerbation who were hospitalized in our clinic) were included in the case control study. Fifty age and sex matched healthy individuals who were admitted to our outpatient clinics and who had no respiratory disease were enrolled as a control group. COPD was diagnosed according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines and an exacerbation of COPD was defined as sustained (48 hours) worsening of dyspnea, cough, or sputum production leading to an increase in the use of maintenance medications and/or supplementation with additional medications (8, 9). All COPD patients were current or ex-smokers. Chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease, cancer, diabetes mellitus, acute inflammatory disease and thyroid dysfunction were considered as exclusion criteria (10). The body mass index (BMI) and pulmonary function tests (PFTs) were detected and leucocyte count, CRP, serum urea and creatinine analysis were measured in COPD patients. In addition, COPD patients were staged according to the »ABCD« assessment tool (11). Serum CysC levels were measured in all subjects. PFT was performed using a spirometry device (Ultima CPX 790705-205, St. Paul, MN, USA). Spirometric examination was conducted according to the European Respiratory Society (ERS) criteria. FEV1 and forced vital capacity (FVC) are expressed as percentages of predicted values according to the prediction equations of the ERS (12).

Laboratory measurements

Complete blood cell counts were measured by an automated blood counter (ADVIA 2120i, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA) CRP levels were determined by immunonephelometry (BNII Nephelometer System, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products, Marburg, Germany). The urea and creatinine levels were measured with an automated analyzer (Advia 2400 Chemistry System; Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc.). Serum was separated by centrifugation at 3000 g, and stored at –80 °C within 1 hour of collection until analysis. Serum CysC was measured using the N latex Cystatin C test kit (ref OQNM17; Siemens, Marburg, Germany) in a nephelometer (BNII Dade Behring, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products GmbH, Marburg, Germany).

Statistical analysis

IBM SPSS Statistics 21 (Statistical Product and Service Solutions 21.0 version, authorization code: d91314f638c364094170; Armonk, NY, USA) Package was used for the statistical analysis. The results were given as mean ± SD. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. One-Way Anova test was used for the comparison of multiple groups. Student's t-test was used for the comparison of two independent groups. X2 test was carried out to compare gender distribution. Correlations between the variables were established by the Pearson’s correlation.

Results

Demographic data and laboratory results of all subjects and parameters of PFTs of COPD patients are shown in . No statistically significant difference was found among the three groups in terms of age (p>0.05) and gender (p>0.05, X2=2.371). Demographic data, functional parameters, and laboratory results of all subjects. CRP; C-reactive protein, FEV1; forced expiratory volume in 1 second, FVC; forced vital capacity, BMI; body mass index, N/A = not available, CysC; cystatin C a p<0.001, compared with healthy controls, b p<0.001, c p<0.05, compared with COPD patients with exacerbation, d p<0.01, compared with healthy controls, e p<0.05, compared with healthy controls The mean serum CysC values in both COPD groups were significantly higher than control group (p<0.001, for both COPD group). There was no statistically significant difference in CysC values between COPD groups (p>0.05) (). Also, no statistically significant difference was observed in CysC values between patients with emphysema and chronic bronchitis in both COPD groups. In addition, current smoker COPD patients had increased levels of CysC when compared to ex-smoker COPD patients in the stable group (1.91±3.07, 0.88±0.28, p<0.05) but there was no statistically significant difference in CysC values between stable COPD patients according to the »ABCD« assessment tool (26 (38.2%) of them »B« and 42 (61.8%) of them »D«; the mean CysC 1.05±0.56, 1.33±2.30, respectively, p>0.05). Serum CysC levels in the study population. The mean CRP, leucocytes levels were significantly higher in the exacerbation group than in stable COPD (p<0.001 for both) (). The mean FEV1 levels were significantly lower in the exacerbation group than stable COPD (p<0.05). Significant negative correlation was found between FEV1 and CysC levels and positive correlation between CysC and smoking (pack/year) and CRP levels in the stable COPD group (r=-0.421, p<0.001, r=0.444, p<0.001, r=0.262, p<0.05 respectively) (). Also, a significant positive correlation was observed between CysC levels and urea, creatinine, smoking (pack/year) and CRP levels in the exacerbation group (r=0.333, p<0.05; r=0.049, p<0.05; r=0.288, p<0.05; r=0.414, p<0.01, respectively) (). Correlations between CysC and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and C-reactive protein (CRP) and smoking in stable COPD patients. Correlations between CysC and urea, creatinine, CRP and smoking levels in exacerbation group. When stable COPD patients and control group were evaluated, CysC had an area under the curve (AUC) in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.951 (0.909–0.994 95% CI: p<0.001). A CysC level of 0.69 mg/L was accepted as the cut-off value between stable COPD patients and control group. CysC had a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 80% (ROC curve) (). A; A cut-off level of CysC in stable COPD patients and control group. B; Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve indicating sensitivity and specificity of CysC to diagnose COPD.

Discussion

The main finding of our study was, CysC levels were significantly higher in both COPD groups than controls. There was a negative correlation between FEV1 and CysC levels in the stable COPD group and a positive correlation between CysC and CRP levels in both COPD groups. Also, CysC had a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 80% in the stable COPD group. COPD is an inflammatory disorder which involves accelerated lung function loss. Persistent inflammation in COPD may lead to the recruitment of inflammatory cells and increased protease activity in the lungs. Chronic cigarette smoking may decrease CysC levels, which is a cathepsin L inhibitor in the lungs, and this may cause emphysematous changes (13). Contrastly, increased levels of CysC in BAL and serum were determined in patients with emphysema especially in the smokers and inflammatory lung disease (6, 14, 15). Also, it has been shown that the level of CysC in the culture medium of alveolar macrophages from smokers was higher than in nonsmokers (16). Another study showed a significant association between emphysema and serum CysC in a large representative US population. The emphysema group had significantly higher mean CysC levels compared to the normal controls. Authors concluded that any active or second-hand smoke exposure might contribute to increased serum CysC levels (5). In a previous study, a significant relation was found between inflammatory parameters such as interleukin-6, resistin, tumor necrosis factor, and CRP with CysC and it was thought that the elevation of CysC was secondary to the inflammatory processes in the lung (5, 17). Moreover, serum CysC has been found as a positive acute-phase reactant in COPD patients and might indicate systemic inflammation during the progression of COPD (18). In accordance with these studies, we also determined increased levels of CysC in both COPD groups compared with healthy controls and the level of CysC was positively correlated with smoking and CRP levels in stable COPD patients. These data suggest that elevated CysC levels may be associated with pulmonary inflammation caused by smoking. It was shown that a significant relation between serum CysC level and lung functional parameters in stable COPD patients and a high CysC concentration might be a potential indicator of impaired lung function and measuring routinely CysC levels might improve the diagnosis and assessment of COPD severity (10, 19). Our results showed a significantly negative correlation between CysC levels and FEV1 in stable COPD patients but there was no significant difference in the CysC levels when we staged COPD patients according to the »ABCD« assessment tool. So, we think that serum CysC may be used only to determine and follow up the severity of airflow limitation in these patients. The diagnosis of chronic kidney disease in COPD patients may be useful for the prognosis of COPD patients. Recently, a meta-analysis result showed that there was a statistically significant relation between chronic renal failure and short-term mortality in hospitalized adults with acute exacerbation of COPD (20). Also, the relation between CysC levels and the comorbidities of renal dysfunction in patients with COPD exacerbation was determined and CysC has been found an independent risk factor for hospital mortality in COPD exacerbation (21). CysC may reflect renal function in COPD patients (22, 23, 24). Our results showed that CysC levels were positively correlated with urea, creatinine and CRP levels in patients with COPD exacerbation. The mean creatinine concentration was within a normal range and below 2 mg/dL in our patients with COPD exacerbation. We think that CysC may be a good measurement of renal function in COPD exacerbation. Macrophages which are major inflammatory cells that produce cystatin C play an important role in the chronic inflammatory process in stable COPD, while neutrophils are majorly involved in acute inflammatory responses in patients with acute exacerbation (13, 25, 26). This may explain why the serum level of CysC was not significantly different in both COPD group. Proteomic analyses for determining disease markers in various samples from COPD patients have been done in some studies. Serum levels of CysC may be a potential marker to determine the disease severity but to our knowledge, there is no data about the potential diagnostic value of CysC in COPD patients (10, 19). Our results determined that serum levels of CysC showed high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of COPD. Because of the high sensitivity and specifity, CysC might be suitable as a marker for diagnosis of the disease. Our study has several limitations. Primarily, the sample size in this study is relatively small. Second, we excluded COPD patients with comorbidities that also affect inflammatory responses. Third, CysC levels were only measured in sera. Also, systemic treatment used in the exacerbation period may affect CysC levels in these patients. In conclusion, the level of CysC was increased in COPD patients. Increased CysC levels may be related with inflammation and the severity of airflow obstruction but not disease severity in stable COPD patients. In addition, cystatin C levels may be a potential indicator for the diagnosis of COPD.
Table I

Demographic data, functional parameters, and laboratory results of all subjects.

ParametersCOPD (Stable) (n= 68)COPD (n= Exacerbation) (58)Control (n= 50)
Age (years)64.19±10.665.12±6.9360.12±11.77
Gender (male/female)60/848/1041/9
Current/ex/never smoker23/45/–13/39/–12/15/23
Smoking (pack/years)20.35±10.7d19.06±10e13.63±7.02
FEV1 (%)45.34±16.11c39.67±15.07NA
FVC (%)69.81±19.46b52.02±13.43NA
FEV1/FVC (%)56.49±10.7854.29±9.98NA
CysC (mg/L)1.01±0.56a0.97±0.29a0.47±0.13
Leucocyte (×103/μL)7174±2508b10753±4985NA
CRP (mg/L)14.70±18.89b43.09±51.32NA
BMI (kg/m2)25.67±4.8225.86±7.0NA
Urea (mmol/L)14.44±7.0616.33±7.01NA
Creatinine (mmol/L)0.07±0.020.07±0.02NA

CRP; C-reactive protein, FEV1; forced expiratory volume in 1 second, FVC; forced vital capacity, BMI; body mass index, N/A = not available, CysC; cystatin C

a p<0.001, compared with healthy controls, b p<0.001, c p<0.05, compared with COPD patients with exacerbation, d p<0.01, compared with healthy controls, e p<0.05, compared with healthy controls

  21 in total

1.  Serum cystatin C concentration as a marker of renal dysfunction in the elderly.

Authors:  D Fliser; E Ritz
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.860

2.  Serum cystatin C and emphysema: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).

Authors:  Haala K Rokadia; Shikhar Agarwal
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.584

3.  Significant elevation of plasma cathepsin B and cystatin C in patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Yuan-Ti Lee; Shiuan-Chih Chen; Ling-Yuh Shyu; Meng-Chih Lee; Tzu-Chin Wu; Shih-Ming Tsao; Shun-Fa Yang
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.786

Review 4.  Serum cystatin C as an endogenous marker of the renal function--a review.

Authors:  E Randers; E J Erlandsen
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Recognition of cytoplasmic RNA results in cathepsin-dependent inflammasome activation and apoptosis in human macrophages.

Authors:  Johanna Rintahaka; Niina Lietzén; Tiina Öhman; Tuula A Nyman; Sampsa Matikainen
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Cystatin C and albuminuria as risk factors for development of CKD stage 3: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).

Authors:  Shani Shastri; Ronit Katz; Michael G Shlipak; Bryan Kestenbaum; Carmen A Peralta; Holly Kramer; David R Jacobs; Ian H de Boer; Mary Cushman; David Siscovick; Mark J Sarnak
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 7.  Cystatin C.

Authors:  David J Newman
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.057

Review 8.  Cells, mediators and Toll-like receptors in COPD.

Authors:  Hadi Sarir; Paul A J Henricks; Anneke H van Houwelingen; Frans P Nijkamp; Gert Folkerts
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 4.432

9.  Cystatin C and cathepsin B production by alveolar macrophages from smokers and nonsmokers.

Authors:  A H Warfel; C Cardozo; O H Yoo; D Zucker-Franklin
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.962

10.  Airway and systemic inflammation and decline in lung function in patients with COPD.

Authors:  Gavin C Donaldson; Terence A R Seemungal; Irem S Patel; Angshu Bhowmik; Tom M A Wilkinson; John R Hurst; Peter K Maccallum; Jadwiga A Wedzicha
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effect of propolis and N-acetylcysteine supplementation on lipoprotein subclasses distribution and paraoxonase 1 activity in subjects with acute respiratory infection.

Authors:  Jelena Vekić; Jasmina Ivanišević; Aleksandra Zeljković; Vesna Spasojević-Kalimanovska; Nataša Bogavac-Stanojević; Marija Mihajlović; Jelena Janać; Sanja Vujčić; Milica Miljković; Dejan Zujović; Jelena Kotur-Stevuljević
Journal:  J Med Biochem       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The association between cystatin C and COPD: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Limin Chai; Wei Feng; Cui Zhai; Wenhua Shi; Jian Wang; Xin Yan; Qingting Wang; Qianqian Zhang; Manxiang Li
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.317

3.  Association of cathepsin B and cystatin C with an age-related pulmonary subclinical state in a healthy Chinese population.

Authors:  Nan Wang; Yajun Yuan; Xiaojuan Bai; Wen Han; Lulu Han; Bijuan Qing
Journal:  Ther Adv Respir Dis       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.031

4.  Plasma Cathepsin S is Associated with High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Bilirubin in Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Authors:  Bosa Mirjanic-Azaric; Novak Vasic; Darko Cerne; Janko Kos; Natasa Bogavac-Stanojevic
Journal:  J Med Biochem       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Serum Cystatin C and Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Potential Inflammatory Biomarker in Predicting Critical Illness and Mortality for Adult Patients.

Authors:  Dan Chen; Wenwu Sun; Jia Li; Bohua Wei; Wei Liu; Xiaopin Wang; Fan Song; Liangkai Chen; Junhui Yang; Li Yu
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.711

6.  Serum Biomarkers in Patients with Stable and Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Füsun Şahin; Ayşe Filiz Koşar; Ayşe Feyza Aslan; Burcu Yiğitbaş; Berat Uslu
Journal:  J Med Biochem       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.402

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.