| Literature DB >> 30584388 |
Yuko Tsunoda1, Takashi Asahara2, Koji Nomoto3, Yukiko Yoshioka4, Eisuke Fukuma1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mastitis is a common complication in lactating women. However, the diversity of intestinal bacteria in infant exclusively fed infectious milk remains uncharacterized. Our colleagues recently established a method based on 16S and 23S rRNA-targeted reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) for detecting bacteria.Entities:
Keywords: Streptococcus species; fecal organic acids; infant feces; infectious breast milk; intestinal bacteria flora
Year: 2018 PMID: 30584388 PMCID: PMC6287549 DOI: 10.2147/PHMT.S184637
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pediatric Health Med Ther ISSN: 1179-9927
Clinical characteristics of lactation mastitis mothers and their infants
| Variables | Subjects |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Mothers (n=14) | |
| Age (years) | 32 (20–40) |
| Axillary temperature (°C) | |
| Mastitis site | 38.2 (37.1–39.7) |
| Engorgement site | 38.0 (35.9–39.0) |
| Frequency of breast massage (times) | 3.5 (1–10) |
| Interval of milk sampling (days) | 7.5 (5–20) |
| Infants (n=14) | |
| Age (months) | 2.5 (1–5) |
| Gender | |
| Male | 11 |
| Female | 3 |
| Fecal consistency | |
| Soft | 9 |
| Muddy | 3 |
| Liquid | 2 |
Note: Data are expressed as median and range.
Change in counts of bacteria in milk during breast massage
| Before massage | After massage | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| Engorgement site | Mastitis site | Engorgement site | Mastitis site | |||||
|
| ||||||||
| log10 cells/mL | Prevalence | log10 cells/mL | Prevalence | log10 cells/mL | Prevalence | log10 cells/mL | Prevalence | |
|
| ||||||||
| Clostridium coccoides group | ND | ND | ND | 0.3 | 1/14 | |||
| C. leptum subgroup | ND | 0.8 | 1/14 | 1 | 1/14 | 0.5 | ||
| Bacteroides fragilis group | ND | ND | 1/14 | ND | ND | |||
| Bifidobacterium | 1.6 | 2/14 | 2.2±0.5 | 3/14 | 1.3 | 2/14 | 2.2±0.3 | 3/14 |
| Atopobium cluster | 1.5 | 2/14 | 3.1 | 1/14 | 2.3 | 1/14 | 0.7 | 2/14 |
| Prevotella | 2.3 | 1/14 | 2.5 | 1/14 | ND | 0.7 | 2/14 | |
| C. perfringens | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||||
| Total Lactobacillus | 0.9±0.3 | 4/14 | 0.6 | 2/14 | 1.5±0.9 | 3/14 | 0.8 | 2/14 |
| Enterobacteriaceae | 0.3 | 1/14 | 0.5 | 1/14 | ND | 0.6 | 1/14 | |
| Enterococcus | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||||
| Streptococcus | 2.7±1.0 | 14/14 | 3.3±1.4 | 14/14 | 2.5±0.9 | 14/14 | 2.7±0.6 | 14/14 |
| Staphylococcus | 1.5±0.7 | 13/14 | 1.6±1.0 | 14/14 | 1.3±0.8 | 12/14 | 1.6±0.7 | 10/14 |
| Pseudomonas | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||||
Notes:
Data are expressed as mean and SD.
P<0.01, as obtained by comparison with Staphylococcus using the Mann–Whitney U-test;
P=0.056, as obtained by comparison with the sample before massage on engorgement site using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Abbreviation: ND, not detected.
Change in counts of intestinal bacteria in infant feces during breast massage
| Before massage | After massage | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| log10 cells/g | Prevalence | log10 cells/g | Prevalence | |
|
| ||||
| Total bacteria | 10.0±0.6 | 14/14 | 9.9±0.9 | 14/14 |
| 7.7±1.2 | 4/14 | 8.0±0.6 | 4/14 | |
| 5.7 | 2/14 | 6.3 | 2/14 | |
| 9.2±0.6 | 3/14 | 9.2±0.9 | 3/14 | |
| 9.7±1.2 | 12/14 | 9.4±1.7 | 10/14 | |
| 8.1±1.3 | 8/14 | 7.6±0.8 | 8/14 | |
| 5.9±0.5 | 5/14 | 5.8±0.5 | 7/14 | |
| 6.6±2.9 | 3/14 | 6.1±2.9 | 3/14 | |
| Total | 5.6±1.6 | 9/14 | 6.0±1.9 | 8/14 |
| 8.1±1.1 | 12/14 | 7.9±1.1 | 12/14 | |
| 7.8±1.0 | 12/14 | 7.2±1.3 | 12/14 | |
| 8.1±1.2 | 14/14 | 7.6±0.8 | 14/14 | |
| 6.9±1.1 | 14/14 | 6.5±0.9 | 14/14 | |
| ND | ND | |||
Notes:
Data are expressed as mean and SD.
P<0.01, as obtained by comparison with Staphylococcus using the Mann–Whitney U-test;
P=0.033, as obtained by comparison with the sample before massage using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Abbreviation: ND, not detected.
Figure 1(A) Distribution of Streptococcus species isolated from the milk samples at mastitis site (before massage, ●; after massage, ○) and at engorgement site (before massage, ▲; after massage, △). (B) Distribution of Streptococcus species isolated from the infant’s fecal samples (before massage, ■; after massage, □).
Change in fecal organic acids and pH in infant feces during breast massage
| Before massage | After massage | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| μmol/g | Prevalence | μmol/g | Prevalence | ||
|
| |||||
| Total organic acid | 81.8±55.5 | 14/14 | 102.3±77.6 | 14/14 | 0.55 |
| Succinic acid | 9.5±9.6 | 12/14 | 10.4±14.1 | 14/14 | 0.22 |
| Lactic acid | 34.7±30.6 | 13/14 | 49.3±48.6 | 10/14 | 0.86 |
| Formic acid | 6.1±6.8 | 7/14 | 5.7±3.5 | 9/14 | 0.39 |
| Acetic acid | 37.8±25.6 | 14/14 | 41.9±35.8 | 14/14 | 0.83 |
| Propionic acid | 1.2±1.2 | 6/14 | 0.7±0.7 | 5/14 | 0.21 |
| Butyric acid | ND | 5.5 | 2/14 | ||
| Isovaleric acid | ND | ND | |||
| Valeric acid | ND | ND | |||
| pH | 5.3±0.7 | 14/14 | 5.3±1.0 | 13/14 | 0.59 |
Notes:
Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for the difference in changes of fecal organic acids and pH during breast massage.
Data are expressed as mean and SD.
Abbreviation: ND, not detected.