Literature DB >> 30583776

Assessing Quality of Syndesmotic Reduction in Surgically Treated Acute Syndesmotic Injuries: A Systematic Review.

Stein B van den Heuvel1, Siem A Dingemans2, Tjibbe J Gardenbroek2, Tim Schepers3.   

Abstract

There is no universal method with cutoff values for the assessment of distal tibiofibular joint reduction in acute syndesmotic injuries. It is important to detect malreductions because they may lead to impaired functional outcome and may demand reoperations. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature to evaluate the appropriateness of different image techniques in determining syndesmotic malalignment. A literature search was conducted in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to search for articles assessing syndesmotic reduction. Excluded were articles where no criteria and/or measurements for syndesmotic reduction were provided, only normative values were provided and reviews. In total, 2157 articles were found, of which 1421 studies were screened for title and abstract after exclusion of duplicates. One hundred ten studies were eligible for full-text analysis. Of these, 61 were excluded. Three studies where added after screening the included references. Fifty-two studies were included, of which 32 were original publications and 20 were publications referring to the original publications. From the original publications, 14 used plains radiographs, 19 computed tomographic (CT) scans, and 5 used 3-dimensional CT scans (some authors used >1 modality in their study). For each modality, a large number of parameters and different cutoff values were reported. CT scanning is superior to plain radiography in the assessment of the quality of joint reduction. Parameters used the most were fibular position in the incisura and fibular rotation. The criteria for adequate reduction should at least include the position of the fibula in the incisura and rotation of the fibula, while ensuring adequate fibular length, all equaling or at least approaching the values of the uninjured contralateral side.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ankle fracture; imaging; reduction; syndesmosis

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30583776     DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.08.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg        ISSN: 1067-2516            Impact factor:   1.286


  5 in total

1.  Should Diastatic Syndesmosis be Stabilized in Advanced Pronation-External Rotation Ankle Injuries? A Retrospective Cohort Comparison.

Authors:  Chi-Chuan Wu; Wen-Ling Yeh; Po-Cheng Lee; Ying-Chao Chou; Yung-Heng Hsu; Yi-Hsun Yu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 2.279

2.  [Research progress in diagnosis and treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury].

Authors:  Hui Huang; Yunfeng Yang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-10-15

3.  Intraoperative three-dimensional imaging in ankle syndesmotic reduction.

Authors:  Markus Beck; Manuela Brunk; Alice Wichelhaus; Thomas Mittlmeier; Robert Rotter
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Association of acute inflammatory cytokines, fracture malreduction, and functional outcome 12 months after intra-articular ankle fracture-a prospective cohort study of 46 patients with ankle fractures.

Authors:  That Minh Pham; Emil Bjoertomt Kristiansen; Lars Henrik Frich; Kate Lykke Lambertsen; Søren Overgaard; Hagen Schmal
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Evidence-Based Surgical Treatment Algorithm for Unstable Syndesmotic Injuries.

Authors:  Markus Regauer; Gordon Mackay; Owen Nelson; Wolfgang Böcker; Christian Ehrnthaller
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.