| Literature DB >> 30583586 |
Stefania Marzorati1, Luisella Verotta2, Stefano P Trasatti3.
Abstract
Over the past decade, green chemistry has been emphasizing the importance of protecting the environment and human health in an economically beneficial manner aiming at avoiding toxins and reducing wastes. The field of metallic materials degradation, generally faced by using toxic compounds, found a fertile research field in green chemistry. In fact, the use of inhibitors is a well-known strategy when metal corrosion needs to be prevented, controlled, or retarded. Green inhibitors are biodegradable, ecologically acceptable and renewable. Their valorization expands possible applications in industrial fields other than 'waste to energy' in the perspective of circular economy. Although lot of experimental work has been done and many research papers have been published, the topic of green inhibitors is still an open issue. The great interest in the field expanded the research, resulting in high numbers of tested molecules. However, the most frequently adopted approaches are conventional and, hence, not suitable to fully characterize the potential efficacy of inhibitors. All the mentioned aspects are the object of the present review and are meant as a constructive criticism to highlight the weak points of the green inhibitors field as to re-evaluate the literature and address the future research in the field that still lacks rationalization.Entities:
Keywords: biomass waste; corrosion inhibitors; green chemistry; metal protection; natural products
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30583586 PMCID: PMC6337343 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24010048
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Number of publications per 20-year-range from 1920 to 2018.
Summary of the main features of the cited green extracts employed as corrosion inhibitors.
| Plant or Source | Is the Source Derived from Bio-Wastes? | Major Constituent Responsible for Inhibition | Solvent and Extraction Method | Metal to Protect | Corrosive Environment | Max Corrosion Inhibition Efficiency/% | Inhibitor Concetration | Theoretical Calculations | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Propolis | no | n.d | Boiling water | Carbon steel | 10 ppm NaCl and 35 ppm Al2 (SO4)3 | 92.7 at 30 °C | 0.6 g L−1 | n.r. | [ |
| 11% | no | 3,5-diprenyl-4-hydroxycinnamic acid | Commercial | Mild steel | 3.5% | n.r. | 13 ± 3 g m−2 | n.r. | [ |
| Citrus peel | yes | Pectin | HCl hydrolysis-precipitation with ethanol | Mild steel | 1 M HCl | 94.2 at 45 °C | 2 g L−1 | n.r. | [ |
| Citrus peel | yes | Pectin | Commercial | Aluminum | 0.5 to 2 M HCl | 91 at 10 °C | 8 g L−1 | n.r. | [ |
| Pectin from apples | no | Pectin | Commercial | X60 steel | 0.5 M HCl | 78.7 at 25 °C | 1 g L−1 | yes | [ |
| Pectin from apples | no | Pectin and CeO2 | Commercial | X60 steel | 0.5 M HCl | 75.4 at 25 °C | 0.5 g L−1 pectin + 5 mM CeO2 | n.r. | [ |
| Cladodes of | no | Pectin | Microwave | Steel | 1 M HCl | 94 at 35 °C | 1 g L−1 | n.r. | [ |
| Leaves of henna | no | n.d. | Boiling water | C-steel | 0.1 M HCl | 95.78 at 30 °C | 0.8 g L−1 | n.r. | [ |
| 3.5% NaCl | 91.01 at 30 °C | ||||||||
| 0.1 M NaOH | 69.56 at 30 °C | ||||||||
| Nickel | 0.1 M HCl | 88.77 at 30 °C | |||||||
| 3.5% NaCl | 82.88 at 30 °C | ||||||||
| 0.1 M NaOH | 73.91 at 30 °C | ||||||||
| Zinc | 0.1 M HCl | 76.19 at 30 °C | |||||||
| 3.5% NaCl | 93.44 at 30 °C | ||||||||
| 0.1M NaOH | 76.92 at 30 °C | ||||||||
| Four brands of leaves of henna | no | n.d. | Shaking in the corrosive medium | Aluminium and steel | 0.1 M HCl, 0.1 M NaOH and 0.1 M NaCl | n.r. | n.r. | n.r. | [ |
| Leaves of henna | yes | Lawsone, Gallic acid, α- | Boiling water | Mild steel | 1 M HCl | 90.34 at 25 °C | 1.2 g L−1 | yes | [ |
| no | n.d. | Soaking in methanol | Bronze | Simulated acid rain solution | 95 | 0.4 g L−1 | n.r. | [ | |
| Fresh leaves of | no | n.d. | Methanol | Mild steel | 1 M HCl | 91.6 at 25 °C | 0.15 g L−1 | Attempts | [ |
| Grains of | no | n.d. | Methanol, then acidic/alkaline extraction | 6063 Aluminium Alloy | 1 M HCl | 91.78 at 25 °C | 0.025 g L−1 | n.r. | [ |
| yes | Flavan-3-ol | ASTM 1110-96 and TAPPI T204 OM-88 standard | Low carbon steel | 1 M HCl | 66 | 0.2 g L−1 | Attempts | [ | |
| Ascorbic acid and folic acid | no | Ascorbic acid and folic acid | Commercial | Mild steel | 0.3 and 0.03% NaCI | n.d. | 0.2 g L−1 for ascorbic acid and 0.5 g L−1 for folic acid | yes | [ |
| Ascorbic acid | no | Ascorbic acid | Commercial | Mild steel | H2SO4 pH 4 | 71.5 at 20 °C | 10−3 mol L−1 | n.r. | [ |
| Seeds of | no | Piperine, Safrole, and Dihydrocubebin | Refluxing in 1 M HCl | Mild steel | 1 M HCl | 88.4 | 0.9 g L−1 | yes | [ |
| Refluxing in 0.5 M H2SO4 | 0.5 M H2SO4 | 97.7 | 0.9 g L−1 | ||||||
| Streptomycin | no | Streptomycin | Commercial | Mild steel | 1 M HCl | 88.5 at 35 °C | 0.5 g L−1 | n.r. | [ |
| no | n.d. | Acidic/alkaline extraction | C38 steel | 1 M HCl | 90 at 25 °C | 0.1 g L−1 | n.r. | [ | |
| no | Geissospermine | Acidic/alkaline extraction | C38 steel | 1 M HCl | 90 at 25 °C | 0.1 g L−1 | yes | [ | |
| no | Sparteine, ammodendrine, anagyrin and dehydrosparteine | Acidic/alkaline extraction | Carbon steel | 1 M HCl | 83 at 30 °C | 0.4 g L−1 | n.r. | [ | |
| no | Cytisine | Acidic/alkaline extraction | Carbon steel | 1 M HCl | 94.42 at 30 °C | 0.4 g L−1 | n.r. | [ | |
| Bark and leaves of | no | 3β-isodihydrocadambine | Acidic/alkaline extraction | Mild steel | 1 M HCl | 91 at 30 °C | 0.005 g L−1 of bark extract | yes | [ |
| Leaves of | no | n.d. | Acidic/alkaline extraction | C38 steel | 1 M HCl | 89 at 25 °C | 0.1 g L−1 | n.r. | [ |
| Dry olive leaves | yes | Hydroxytyrosol (hypothesis) | Boiling water | Carbon steel | 2 M HCl | 93 at 25 °C | 0. 9 g L−1 | n.r. | [ |
| Leaves of | no | Myricetin, quercetin, and rutin | Soaking in methanol | Mild steel | 1 M H2SO4 | 83.54 at 30 °C | 0.5 g L−1 | n.r. | [ |
| Bark of | no | n.d. | Maceration in 9 different solvents | Mild steel | 1 M HCl | 57.9 | 0.1 g L−1 | n.r. | [ |
| no | 9,12,15-octadecatrienoic acid (C18:3); 9,12-octadecadienoic acid (C18:2), and hexadecanoic acid (C16:0) | Chloroform and methanol | Mild steel | 1 M HCl | 95.1 | 0.035 g L−1 | yes | [ | |
| Tomato peel waste | yes | Pectin | Extraction with oxalates | Tin | 2% NaCl, 1% acetic acid and 0.5% citric acid solution | 72.98 at 25 °C | 4 g L−1 | yes | [ |
| Solid waste from fresh leaves of Banana, sugarcane and wate melon hardcore | yes | n.d. | Ethanol | Mild steel | 1 M HCl | 69.60, 68.41 and 58.15 at 25 °C for Banana, sugarcane and watermelon hardcore | 10% | n.r. | [ |
| Shrimps shell waste | yes | Chitosan | NaOH | Carbon steel | 1 M HCl | 88.50 at 25 °C | 10−5 M | n.r. | [ |
| Watermelon rind, seeds and peel | yes | n.d. | Boiling in 1 M HCl | Mild steel | 1 M HCl | Max of 86.08 for seeds extract | 2 g L−1 | Attempts | [ |
n.d.: not determined; n.r.: not reported.