Literature DB >> 30582731

Evaluation of Pupil Fields Using a Newly Developed Perimeter in Glaucoma Patients.

Kazuko Totsuka1, Ken Asakawa2, Hitoshi Ishikawa1,2, Nobuyuki Shoji1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate objective pupil fields using a newly developed perimeter for the detection of glaucomatous damage.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three eyes of 32 glaucoma patients (42-69 years) were examined. Glaucomatous eyes were classified into three stages using the Hodapp-Anderson-Parrish grading scale (early, 16; moderate, 14; and severe, 13 eyes). The head-mounted perimeter "imo" was used to measure the percentage pupil constriction (PPC) of the pupil fields at 36 test points. A stimulus target size of Goldmann V with 0 decibels (dB) light under 31.4 apostilbs (asb) background was presented. Visual fields were measured with the Humphrey Field Analyzer 10-2 program. Using the 3D OCT-2000, 10 × 10 grid of the macular thickness were also obtained. Median correlation coefficients (r) of each examined eye were analyzed between the PPC and visual field sensitivity (dB), and the thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), ganglion cell layer (GCL)+ (GCL + inner plexiform layer [IPL]), and GCL++ (RNFL + GCL + IPL), respectively.
RESULTS: Moderate correlations between the PPC and dB (r = 0.44-0.55), and GCL++ (r = 0.43-0.45) were obtained in the correspondence analysis of 12 test points. There were no significant differences in glaucoma severity (P = 0.924-1.000). However, some patients with extremely early stage glaucoma (visual field index ≥90%) tended to have poor correlation.
CONCLUSIONS: Pupil fields of the imo generally corresponded to the visual fields and the RNFL + GCL + IPL thickness, even in early glaucoma; however, the examiner must clearly understand the criteria of patient selection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pupil field; glaucoma; macular thickness; pupillary response; visual field

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30582731     DOI: 10.1080/02713683.2018.1562078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Eye Res        ISSN: 0271-3683            Impact factor:   2.424


  2 in total

1.  Comparison of imo and Humphrey field analyzer perimeters in glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Yoshinori Nakai; Kyoko Bessho; Yuko Shono; Kaori Taoka; Yoshihide Nakai
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Challenges to detect glaucomatous visual field loss with pupil perimetry.

Authors:  Ken Asakawa; Nobuyuki Shoji
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.