Literature DB >> 30582720

Functional Movement ScreenTM total score does not present a gestalt measure of movement quality in youth athletes.

Matthew David Wright1, Paul Chesterton2.   

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the internal consistency and factor structure of the Functional Movement Screen (FMSTM) in youth athletes and quantify differences between individual task score at different stages of maturation. FMSTM and anthropometric variables were measured in 144 youth athletes (96 female, 48 male). Biological maturation was categorised as before- (<-0.5 years), at- (-0.49-0.50 years) and after- peak height velocity [PHV] (>0.51 years). Internal consistency was poor (Cronbach's alpha; 0.53, ±90% confidence limit 0.10; ordinal alpha 0.6, ±0.09). Principle component analysis extracted two components, representing 47% of the total variance. Tasks loading highest on component 1 required stability, while those loading highest on component 2 favoured mobility. "Likely" decrements in component 1 tasks were observed before-PHV. In-line lunge (effect size ±90% confidence limit; -0.47, ±0.49), hurdle step (-0.38, ±0.49), and trunk stability push-up (-0.51, ±0.45), were lower compared with athletes at-PHV and rotatory stability (-0.44, ±0.37) was lower than those after-PHV. Boys' scored "most likely", higher (0.73, ±0.28) in trunk stability push-up, and girls "likely" higher in shoulder mobility (0.46, ±0.29). In our population, the FMSTM is not uni-dimensional, thus total score should be avoided. Clear maturation affects were observed in stability tasks.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FMS; PCA; long-term athlete development

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30582720     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1559980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  5 in total

1.  FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT SCREEN™ (FMS™) SCORES DO NOT PREDICT OVERALL OR LOWER EXTREMITY INJURY RISK IN COLLEGIATE DANCERS.

Authors:  Sarah M Coogan; Catherine S Schock; Jena Hansen-Honeycutt; Shane Caswell; Nelson Cortes; Jatin P Ambegaonkar
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2020-12

2.  Functional Movement Screen Task Scores and Joint Range-of-motion: A Construct Validity Study.

Authors:  Cesar A Hincapié; George A Tomlinson; Malinda Hapuarachchi; Tatjana Stankovic; Steven Hirsch; Danielle Carnegie; Doug Richards; David Frost; Tyson A C Beach
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  Are Early or Late Maturers Likely to Be Fitter in the General Population?

Authors:  Alan M Nevill; Yassine Negra; Tony D Myers; Michael J Duncan; Helmi Chaabene; Urs Granacher
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Is Adiposity Associated with the Quality of Movement Patterns in the Mid-Adolescent Period?

Authors:  Josip Karuc; Goran Marković; Marjeta Mišigoj-Duraković; Michael J Duncan; Maroje Sorić
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  Assessment of Dysfunctional Movements and Asymmetries in Children and Adolescents Using the Functional Movement Screen-A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Pat R Vehrs; Martina Uvacsek; Aaron W Johnson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.