Literature DB >> 30582719

Outcomes for Patients Who Contact the Emergency Ambulance Service and Are Not Transported to the Emergency Department: A Data Linkage Study.

Joanne Coster, Alicia O'Cathain, Richard Jacques, Annabel Crum, A Niroshan Siriwardena, Janette Turner.   

Abstract

Objectives: Emergency ambulance services do not transport all patients to hospital. International literature reports non-transport rates ranging from 3.7-93.7%. In 2017, 38% of the 11 million calls received by ambulance services in England were attended by ambulance but not transported to an Emergency Department (ED). A further 10% received clinical advice over the telephone. Little is known about what happens to patients following a non-transport decision. We aimed to investigate what happens to patients following an emergency ambulance telephone call that resulted in a non-transport decision, using a linked routine data-set.
Methods: Six-months individual patient level data from one ambulance service in England, linked with Hospital Episode Statistics and national mortality data, were used to identify subsequent health events (ambulance re-contact, ED attendance, hospital admission, death) within 3 days (primary analysis) and 7 days (secondary analysis) of an ambulance call ending in non-transport to hospital. Non-clinical staff used a priority dispatch system e.g. Medical Priority Dispatch System to prioritize calls for ambulance dispatch. Non-transport to ED was determined by ambulance crew members at scene or clinicians at the emergency operating center when an ambulance was not dispatched (telephone advice).
Results: The data linkage rate was 85% for patients who were discharged at scene (43,108/50,894). After removal of deaths associated with end of life care (N = 312), 9% (3,861/42,796) re-contacted the ambulance service, 12.6% (5,412/42,796) attended ED, 6.3% (2,694/42,796) were admitted to hospital, and 0.3% (129/42,796) died within 3 days of the call. Rates were higher for events occurring within 7 days. For example, 12% re-contacted the ambulance service, 16.1% attended ED, 9.3% were admitted to hospital, and 0.5% died. The linkage rate for telephone advice calls was low because ambulance services record less information about these patients (24% 2,514/10,634). A sensitivity analysis identified a range of subsequent event rates: 2.5-10.5% of patients were admitted to hospital and 0.06-0.24% of patient died within 3 days of the call. Conclusions: Most non-transported patients did not have subsequent health events. Deaths after non-transport are an infrequent event that could be selected for more detailed review of individual cases, to facilitate learning and improvement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ambulance; non-transport; patient outcomes; patient safety; prehospital care

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30582719     DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1549628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care        ISSN: 1090-3127            Impact factor:   3.077


  9 in total

1.  A Geospatial Analysis of Distances to Hospitals that Admit Pediatric Asthma Patients.

Authors:  Jennifer Fishe; Erik Finlay; Sam Palmer; Phyllis Hendry
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 3.077

2.  Relationship Between Nonconveyed Cases and On-Scene Time Intervals for Emergency Medical Services.

Authors:  Daifallah M Alrazeeni
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2020-12-08

3.  Nontransported Cases after Emergency Medical Service Callout in the Rural and Urban Areas of the Riyadh Region.

Authors:  Ahmed Ramdan M Alanazy; Stuart Wark; John Fraser; Amanda Nagle
Journal:  Saudi J Med Med Sci       Date:  2020-12-26

4.  Outpatient care in acute and prehospital emergency medicine by emergency medical and patient transport service over a 10-year period: a retrospective study based on dispatch data from a German emergency medical dispatch centre (OFF-RESCUE).

Authors:  Marc S Schehadat; Guido Scherer; David A Groneberg; Manfred Kaps; Michael H K Bendels
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2021-03-09

5.  Experience of using video support by prehospital emergency care physician in ambulance care - an interview study with prehospital emergency nurses in Sweden.

Authors:  Veronica Vicente; Anders Johansson; Magnus Selling; Johnny Johansson; Sebastian Möller; Lizbet Todorova
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2021-04-07

6.  EMS non-conveyance: A safe practice to decrease ED crowding or a threat to patient safety?

Authors:  Jani Paulin; Jouni Kurola; Mari Koivisto; Timo Iirola
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2021-10-09

7.  Ambulance crew-initiated non-conveyance in the Helsinki EMS system-A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kari Heinonen; Tuukka Puolakka; Heli Salmi; James Boyd; Mia Laiho; Kari Porthan; Heini Harve-Rytsälä; Markku Kuisma
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.274

8.  Using deterministic record linkage to link ambulance and emergency department data: is it possible without patient identifiers? A case study from the UK.

Authors:  S J Clark; M Halter; A Porter; H C Smith; M Brand; R Fothergill; S J Lindridge; M McTigue; H Snooks
Journal:  Int J Popul Data Sci       Date:  2019-08-05

9.  Linking Ambulance Records with Hospital and Death Index Data to Evaluate Patient Outcomes.

Authors:  Emily Andrew; Shelley Cox; Karen Smith
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-01-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.