| Literature DB >> 30582099 |
Alessandro Castagna1, Eugenio Cesari2, Berardo Di Matteo3,4, Marcello Osimani5, Raffaele Garofalo6, Elizaveta Kon3,4, Maurilio Marcacci3,4, Claudio Chillemi7.
Abstract
Purpose The aim of the present retrospective study is to describe the results obtained at 2-year follow-up by using a porcine dermis-derived collagen membrane implanted as augmentation to treat large rotator cuff tears. Methods Thirty-five patients in total were included according to the following criteria: large or massive rotator cuff tear, confirmed during surgery, measuring between 3 and 5 cm in width and stage 1 to 2 fatty infiltration documented at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients underwent arthroscopic repair of the cuff augmented by the implantation of a porcine dermal collagen membrane. Patients were evaluated up to 24 months after surgery by the Constant score and MRI imaging to assess functional outcomes and re-tear rate. The results obtained were compared to those of a matched cohort of 35 patients operated by arthroscopic repair alone by the same surgical team. Results The application of the porcine membrane proved to be safe without scaffold-related adverse events documented. A statistically significant difference in the Constant score in favor of the treatment group was documented at the final evaluation ( p = 0.036 ). Furthermore, a subgroup analysis revealed that patients treated by augmentation and presenting re-tear at MRI showed a significantly higher functional outcome compared with control patients with MRI evidence of re-tear ( p = 0.0136). Conclusion Arthroscopic repair augmented by porcine dermal xenograft for the treatment of chronic and retracted rotator cuff tears with low-grade fatty degeneration proved to be safe and also effective, with higher functional score compared with the arthroscopic repair alone. Level of Evidence This is a Level III, retrospective cohort study.Entities:
Keywords: augmentation; dermal collagen membrane; massive tear; rotator cuff; scaffold
Year: 2018 PMID: 30582099 PMCID: PMC6301848 DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1676106
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Joints ISSN: 2512-9090
Fig. 1Arthroscopic implantation technique of the graft.
Mean Constant score in the treatment and control groups (overall results and subgroup analysis according to MRI evidence of re-tear)
| Constant score | Treatment group (mean ± SD) | Control group (mean ± SD) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperative | 37.2 + 8.2 | 37.3 + 5.3 | n.s. |
| Follow-up (24 months) | 71.4 + 11.8 | 63.9 + 11.9 | 0.036 |
| Follow-up (24 months) | 65.3 + 10.8 | 53.4 + 9.7 | 0.0136 |
Abbreviations: MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; SD, standard deviation; n.s., non significant.