Literature DB >> 30582078

Manifestation of a solitary retinal astrocytic hamartoma in a patient with Best macular dystrophy.

Stanford C Taylor1, Huber M Vasconcelos1,2, Paul Yang1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the case of an adolescent male with a history of Best macular dystrophy and retinal astrocytic hamartoma. OBSERVATIONS: A 15 year old male with a history of Best macular dystrophy who had been followed by ophthalmology for 9 years was noted to have progressive enlargement of a superonasal peripapillary retinal lesion. Imaging and exam are consistent with a diagnosis of retinal astrocytic hamartoma. There were no extraocular signs or symptoms that were diagnostic of a phakamatosis. Genetic testing was positive for a mutation in BEST1, but not TSC1 or TSC2. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: Retinal astrocytic hamartoma is an unusual association with Best macular dystrophy, and this case highlights the balanced approach needed to navigate a potentially complex work-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Best macular dystrophy; Retinal astrocytoma

Year:  2018        PMID: 30582078      PMCID: PMC6299127          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2018.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep        ISSN: 2451-9936


Introduction

Best macular dystrophy describes a relatively uncommon autosomal dominant retinal disorder with an estimated prevalence of 1.5–20 cases per 100,000 individuals., It is characterized by vitelliform lesions of the central maculae that often develop retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) hyperpigmentation and atrophy over time. While extramacular vitelliform lesions can occur in a multifocal variant of Best dystrophy, other non-macular retinal lesions have not been associated with this genotype. Here, we report a case of an adolescent male with Best macular dystrophy who also developed a solitary retinal astrocytic hamartoma. This report was carried out with approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the Oregon Health & Science University, is Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant, and the patient and his family provided written consent for publication.

Case

A 6 year old male with a history of amblyopia in the left eye initially presented to our eye clinic in 2009 for evaluation of vitelliform lesions in both maculae. Genetic testing revealed a previously described disease-causing mutation in BEST1, namely Tyr227Cys (EPP = 3)., Examination of family members concluded the father was a Best non-penetrant gene carrier. The patient has since been followed routinely for hereditary Best macular dystrophy and, while the macular sub-retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) deposits have slowly progressed, the patient has maintained a best corrected visual acuity of 20/20 and 20/25 in the right and left eyes, respectively. Beginning in 2013, a peripapillary white and patchy superficial retinal lesion began to be noted superonasal to the optic nerve. Over the ensuing four years, it was noted to slowly increase in size, and the peripheral retina developed a tapetal sheen (Fig. 1). Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) of the lesion in 2018 demonstrated a hyperreflective thickening of the inner retinal layers with a moth-eaten appearance and posterior shadowing (Fig. 2A–B). Fluorescein angiography showed early filling of the small lacey vessels within the lesion (Fig. 2C) with pronounced residual hyperfluoresence in the late phases, and no defined feeder vessel. OCT angiography showed vascular flow consistent with a disorganized capillary network within the lesion, which recapitulates the findings on fluorescein angiography (Fig. 2D). Combined with the ophthalmoscopic appearance, multimodal imaging of the lesion was consistent with a retinal astrocytic hamartoma.5, 6, 7
Fig. 1

Fundus photography of the patient at 15 years old. (Top) Right eye color fundus photo showing a macular scrambled vitelliform lesion, a nasal peripapillary white and patchy superficial retinal lesion, and tapetal sheen with multiple mid-peripheral hyper-pigmented patches. Left eye showing similar findings, but without a peripapillary lesion. (Bottom/Inset) Magnified view of the peripapillary lesion with longitudinal images documenting the growth of the lesion over the past 5 years. There is a small inferior vitelliform deposit that developed one year ago.

Fig. 2

(A) Infrared image of the optic nerve and nasal peripapillary lesion with a horizontal line indicating the plane of the displayed OCT image. (B)Thickening of the nerve fiber layer on SD-OCT, with mass-effect and scattered pinpoint optically empty spaces within the lesion. (C) Fluorescein angiography showing early filling of the small vasculature within the lesion. (D) OCT angiography demonstrating intralesional vascular flow of small vessels, as well as blocking of the underlying retinal vasculature by the lesion.

Fundus photography of the patient at 15 years old. (Top) Right eye color fundus photo showing a macular scrambled vitelliform lesion, a nasal peripapillary white and patchy superficial retinal lesion, and tapetal sheen with multiple mid-peripheral hyper-pigmented patches. Left eye showing similar findings, but without a peripapillary lesion. (Bottom/Inset) Magnified view of the peripapillary lesion with longitudinal images documenting the growth of the lesion over the past 5 years. There is a small inferior vitelliform deposit that developed one year ago. (A) Infrared image of the optic nerve and nasal peripapillary lesion with a horizontal line indicating the plane of the displayed OCT image. (B)Thickening of the nerve fiber layer on SD-OCT, with mass-effect and scattered pinpoint optically empty spaces within the lesion. (C) Fluorescein angiography showing early filling of the small vasculature within the lesion. (D) OCT angiography demonstrating intralesional vascular flow of small vessels, as well as blocking of the underlying retinal vasculature by the lesion. To assess for a potential underlying genetic syndrome associated with the astrocytic hamartoma, the patient was referred to medical genetics where a systemic work-up was performed. Family history was negative for any phakomatoses. No pathognomonic cutaneous findings of tuberous sclerosis complex or neurofibromatosis type 2 were found on physical exam. There were two café-au-lait macules 1 cm in size, one on each hip, which were too few in number to be of diagnostic value. Molecular testing for TSC1 and TSC2 was negative. As there were no extraocular signs or symptoms that were diagnostic of a phakomatosis and negative genetic screening, MRI brain and abdomen were suggested, but not yet recommended at this time by medical genetics. He is currently being observed by ophthalmic and medical genetics on an annual basis.

Discussion

Astrocytic retinal hamartomas represent a rare retinal condition and are usually associated with phakomatoses, with 71% percent of lesions in one series being associated with tuberous sclerosis or neurofibromatosis. Retinal astrocytic hamartomas have rarely been associated with inherited retinal degenerations (e.g. retinitis pigmentosa and Leber's congenital amaurosis),, and its association with Best disease in our case is highly unusual. Only one case of an 11 year old with a combined clinical diagnosis of both Best disease and tuberous sclerosis complex was recently reported. In contrast, our patient had no extraocular stigmata of tuberous sclerosis complex or neurofibromatosis 2, however symptoms may not manifest until later in life. Given the solitary and peripapillary nature of the astrocytic lesion in our patient, it may also be possible that this is a sporadic lesion that is not associated with a phakomatosis., This case illustrates the need to proceed with a balanced approach when working-up patients potentially presenting with unusual combinations of inherited disorders.

Conclusion

Retinal astrocytic hamartomas have previously been documented in patients with retinal dystrophies, including retinitis pigmentosa and Leber's congenital amourosis. Here, we present a rare case of a retinal astrocytic hamartoma in a child with Best macular dystrophy.

Patient consent

Consent to publish this case report has been obtained from the patients legal guardian in writing.

Funding

− NIH K08EY026650 (PY) − Foundation Fighting Blindness Career Development Award CD-NMT-0714-0648 (PY) Supported by grant P30 EY010572 from the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD), and by unrestricted departmental funding from Research to Prevent Blindness (New York, NY).”Conflicts of Interest: The following authors have no financial disclosures: SCT, HV, PY.

Authorship

All authors attest that they meet the current ICMJE criteria for Authorship.
  12 in total

1.  Optical coherence tomography of retinal astrocytic hamartoma in 15 cases.

Authors:  Carol L Shields; Raquel Benevides; Miguel A Materin; Jerry A Shields
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Retinal astrocytic hamartoma in a patient with Leber's congenital amaurosis.

Authors:  Vikas Ambiya; Baruch D Kuppermann; Raja Narayanan
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-03-03

3.  Optical coherence tomography angiography of a retinal astrocytic hamartoma.

Authors:  Madeline Yung; Nicholas Iafe; David Sarraf
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.882

4.  Hereditary macular degeneration--a population survey in the country of Vsterbotten, Sweden.

Authors:  S Nordström
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 3.271

5.  Frequency, genotype, and clinical spectrum of best vitelliform macular dystrophy: data from a national center in Denmark.

Authors:  Hanna Bitner; Patrik Schatz; Liliana Mizrahi-Meissonnier; Dror Sharon; Thomas Rosenberg
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Astrocytic tumors of the retina. Differentiation of sporadic tumors from phakomatosis-associated tumors.

Authors:  T M Ulbright; K H Fulling; E M Helveston
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 5.534

7.  Tuberous sclerosis.

Authors:  R Williams; D Taylor
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1985 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.048

8.  Missense mutations in a retinal pigment epithelium protein, bestrophin-1, cause retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Alice E Davidson; Ian D Millar; Jill E Urquhart; Rosemary Burgess-Mullan; Yusrah Shweikh; Neil Parry; James O'Sullivan; Geoffrey J Maher; Martin McKibbin; Susan M Downes; Andrew J Lotery; Samuel G Jacobson; Peter D Brown; Graeme C M Black; Forbes D C Manson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Retinitis pigmentosa associated with astrocytic hamartomas of the optic disc.

Authors:  P Bec; A Mathis; P Adam; P Maillard; Y Alberge
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.250

10.  Tuberous sclerosis complex with Best's vitelliform macular dystrophy: A combined presentation.

Authors:  Abhinav Dhami; P Vijayalakshmi Devi; Muna Bhende
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.848

View more
  1 in total

1.  Optical coherence tomography angiography of astrocytic hamartoma demonstrates intrinsic vascularity.

Authors:  Ryan N Vogel; T Y Alvin Liu; Mandeep S Singh; Morton F Goldberg
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2020-09-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.