| Literature DB >> 30581918 |
Yi-Hsia Liu1, Christine Mölzer1, Gillian C Milne2, Lucia Kuffová1,3, John V Forrester1,4.
Abstract
Histology (H&E) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) data are provided showing age-related changes in the retinal structure of sTg-IRBP:HEL mice. These include substantial photoreceptor loss, atrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium, Bruch׳s membrane disruption and thickening, along with the presence of drusenoid deposits and changes in basal laminar infoldings. These features resemble some of those key characteristics found in the course of human dry (atrophic) age-related macular degeneration (AMD), particularly with regard to drusen. Hence, we believe the sTg-IRBP:HEL mouse model represents a useful and promising archetype for future study of the mechanism of drusen formation in AMD.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30581918 PMCID: PMC6299122 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.12.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Fig. 1shows representative central retinal sections of 60 day old (P60; “adult”) WT mice (A-C), vs. their P60 sTg-IRBP:HEL counterparts (D-F), and of “aged” (P240–300) WT mice (G-I) vs. P240–300 sTg-IRBP:HEL mice (J-L). H&E histology and TEM pictures are provided along with medians of n = 3 independent measurements per marker. In the adult WT mice, all retinal layers appear complete and intact (A), photoreceptors (180.6 µm) and RPE are well preserved (5.2 µm) (B), and the Bruch׳s membrane shows normal occurrence and thickness (376.3 nm) (C). In the sTg-IRBP:HEL P60 mice, the photoreceptors are partially lost (66.0 µm; D, E), together with BM thickening (1075.0 nm) and abundant drusenoid deposits (F; circle). Comparable to the adult sTg-IRBP:Hel mice, in the aged WT mice (G-I), all retinal layers appear intact, with photoreceptors (118.1 µm) and RPE (4.3 µm) slightly diminished but preserved (G, H). In the aged sTg-IRBP:HEL mice, however, the photoreceptors are completely lost (10.4 µm; J), retinal pigment epithelium further reduced (2.6 µm), and BM thickening and drusenoid deposits are increasingly seen (806.5 nm; K, L; circle). Circle: BM membrane disruption with drusenoid deposit and disorganised basal laminar infoldings; Ch: charcoal-like granule; R: RPE atrophy/loss of pigment; P: undigested POS phagosome; L: lipofuscin granule; Cy: cystic membranous degradation of RPE. Evaluation of retinas for AMD-like features (i.e. BM disruption, drusenoid deposits, loss of RPE pigment, lipofuscin deposition, charcoal-like granules, and undigested POS) followed recent reports by Park et al. [3], and Ramkumar et al. [4]. Abbreviations: RGL, retinal ganglion layer; IPL, inner plexiform layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer; ONL, outer nuclear layer; PIS, photoreceptor inner segments; POS, photoreceptor outer segments; BM, Bruch׳s membrane; CH, choroid.
specifies photoreceptor inner- (PIS) and outer layer (POS), retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), and Bruch׳s Membrane (BM) thickness as presented in Fig. 1. Medians (50th percentile) and ranges (in brackets) of n = 3 measurements each are provided. Wild type (WT; controls) and IRBP:HEL single transgenic (sTg) mice of two age groups were used (P60: post-partum day 60, “adult”; P240–300: post-partum day 240–300, “old”).
| 180.6 (20.8) | 5.2 (0.3) | 376.3 (172.0) | |
| 118.1 (7.0) | 4.3 (1.7) | 537.6 (215.1) | |
| 66.0 (6.9) | 3.9 (1.0) | 1075.0 (268.8) | |
| 10.4 (3.5) | 2.6 (0.7) | 806.5 (451.7) |
compares mice groups based on age (P60 vs. P240-300: post-partum day 60, "adult" vs. day 240-300, "old"), or genotype (WT: wildtype vs. sTg-IRBP:HEL: single transgenic). P-values are provided; asterisks denote significant differences based on a ≥ 95% level of confidence. Medians (50th percentile) of n = 3 independent measurements per marker of interest were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test.
| 0.046* | 0.043* | 0.127 | |
| 0.046* | 0.050* | 0.050* | |
| 0.050* | 0.046* | 0.050* | |
| 0.043* | 0.178 | 0.513 | |
| Subject area | |
| More specific subject area | |
| Type of data | |
| How data was acquired | |
| Data format | |
| Experimental factors | |
| Experimental features | |
| Data source location | |
| Data accessibility | |
| Related research article |