Literature DB >> 30581914

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): Data on higher education.

Waleed Al-Rahmi1, Ahmed Aldraiweesh2, Noraffandy Yahaya1, Yusri Bin Kamin1, Akram M Zeki3.   

Abstract

The data presented in this article are based on provides a systematic and organized review of 219 studies regarding using of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) in higher education from 2012 to 2017. Consequently, the extant, peer-reviewed literature relating to MOOCs was methodically assessed, as a means of formulating a classification for MOOC-focused scholarly literature. The publication journal, country of origin, researchers, release data, theoretical approach, models, methodology and study participants were all factors used to assess and categorise the MOOC. These data contribute to materials required by readers who are interested in different aspects related to the literature of using Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) in higher education. Intention to use, interaction, engagement, motivations and satisfaction were five dynamics assessed in relation to the improvement of MOOCs. Students' academic performance can be influenced by MOOC which has the advantage of facilitating the learning process through offering materials and enabling the share of information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Higher education; Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs); Systematic literature review

Year:  2018        PMID: 30581914      PMCID: PMC6297852          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.11.139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications table Value of the data Creates a deeper understanding of the research issues that have been addressed in information system (IS) and information technology (IT) literature on the MOOCs use. The data in this article provide more details on the theoretical frameworks/models/theories that have been employed in studies dedicated to the topic. The data in this article provide further understanding on the research methods that have been utilized.

Data

The data findings of the review are provided in this section. First, the answers to the above research questions are provided. What are the research issues that have been addressed in IS/IT literature on the MOOCs use? Since 1992, when Davis develop a Motivational Model (MM) to using technology, as well as the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) [1] and extended TAM [2], the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) [3], emphasised that with regard to a focus on IS and IT, the number of studies has consistently increased. From 2012 to 2017, 219 relevant papers were identified in the search. Resultantly, each of these papers was used for this study. Researcher, country of origin, publication journal and year of release were used to assess the papers. With regard to MOOCs and the adoption of IT or IS, proposals for how to undertake meticulous study were made through this specific assessment. The following sections explore this in greater depth.

Trends in the year of release

219 articles comprised the ultimate body of literature assessed in this study. Table 1 presents the number of published papers between 2012 and 2017. 41 were published in 2017, 76 were published in 2016, 49 were published in 2015, 14 were published in 2014, 18 were published in 2013 and 21 were published in 2012. Between 2012 and 2017, evidently the volume of literature focusing on the ongoing use of MOOCs continued to increase, as indicated by the data. Indeed, this subject continues to be a significant focus, with growing emphasis placed on the ongoing use of MOOCs as time has passed. Between 2016 and 2017, 53.4% (117) of the total papers assessed were released, evidencing this increase (see Table 1).
Table 1

Distribution by the year of publication.

YearArticle countPercentageYearArticle countPercentageYearArticle countPercentage
20174118.7%20154922.4%2013188.2%
20167634.7%2014146.4%2012219.6%
Distribution by the year of publication.

Distribution by journal

Table 2 shows the outcome results based on distribution of articles by the journal where authors published. The majority papers was published on ACM international conference proceeding series (3 papers), and social sciences Pakistan (2 papers). As well as other papers was published on 27 various journals (see Table 2). This result and analysis depends on the scope of the journals.
Table 2

Distribution by journal and conference.

JournalNo.JournalNo.
British Journal of Educational Technology34Advanced Science Letters4
International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning31ARPN Journal Of Engineering And Applied Sciences4
American Journal of Distance Education19Educause Review4
Journal of Online Learning and Teaching11Man In India4
Distance Education9Proceedings 2016 4th International Conference On User Science And Engineering I User4
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series8International Education Studies3
Social Sciences Pakistan7International Journal Of Information And Communication Technology Education3
11th International Conference On Cognition And Exploratory Learning In Digital Age Celda7International Journal On Advanced Science Engineering And Information Technology3
2013 IEEE Conference On E Learning E Management And E Services Ic3e 20136International Review Of Research In Open And Distance Learning3
2014 International Conference On IT Convergence And Security Icitcs6Journal Of Theoretical And Applied Information Technology3
2014 International Conference On Web And Open Access To Learning Icwoal6Jurnal Teknologi3
Advances In Education In Diverse Communities Research Policy And Praxis5Lecture Notes In Computer Science Including Subseries Lecture Notes In Artificial Intelligence And Lecture Notes In Bioinformatics2
Australasian Journal Of Engineering Education5Proceedings Sims 2016 2nd International Conference On Systems Informatics Modelling And Simulation2
Communications In Computer And Information Science5Proceedings Uksim Amss 2016 10th European Modelling Symposium On Computer Modelling And Simulation1
Csedu 2015 7th International Conference On Computer Supported Education Proceedings5Technovation1
Csedu 2017 Proceedings Of The 9th International Conference On Computer Supported Education5Turkish Online Journal Of Distance Education1
Development And Learning In Organizations4International Conference On Research And Innovation In Information Systems (ICRIIS)1
Distribution by journal and conference.

Distribution by the type

Table 3 shows that most of the studies were from articles papers with 118 percentages (53.9%), and the review papers with 54 percentages (24.7%). The next conference papers with 47 percentages (21.5%). Noted that high percentages of studies were conference papers and articles.
Table 3

Distribution by the type.

Document typeDocumentsPercentageDocument typeDocumentsPercentage
Articles11853.9%Conference papers4721.5%
Review papers5424.7%Total219100.00%
Distribution by the type.

Distribution by subject area

Table 4 shows the distribution by the subject area we noted most of the studies was from computer science area 63 with percentages (28.8%), education area 42 with percentages (19.2%), and social sciences area 30 with percentages (13.7%). the next studies from arts and humanities area 19 with percentages (8.7%), also business, management and accounting area 19 with percentages (8.7%), and mathematics area 15 with percentages (6.8%). Moreover, agricultural and biological sciences, was 13 studies with percentages (5.9%), and engineering area 11 with percentages (5.0%), and finally environmental science area was 7 studies with percentages (3.2%).
Table 4

Distribution by subject area.

NoSubject areaDocumentsPercentage
1Computer science6328.8%
2Education4219.2%
3Social sciences3013.7%
4Arts and humanities198.7%
5Business, management and accounting198.7%
6Mathematics156.8%
7Agricultural and biological sciences135.9%
8Engineering115.0%
9Environmental science73.2%
Total219100.0%
Distribution by subject area.

Empirical research

Our analysis shows that most of the studies were from quantitative research by survey with 109 percentages (49.8%), and an interview was 48 percentages (21.9%). And finally, mixed methods approach with 62 percentages (28.3%). Thus, the total of quantitative research was a high level with 16 studies. Table 5 shows the results of our classification in empirical research.
Table 5

Specific empirical study strategies adopted to investigate willingness for ongoing adoption of IS.

Study strategyAdopted research techniqueNumber of papersPercentage
Quantitative researchSurvey10949.8%
Qualitative researchInterviews4821.9%
Mixed methodsSurvey, interviews6228.3%
Total219100.0%
Specific empirical study strategies adopted to investigate willingness for ongoing adoption of IS.

Experimental design, materials and methods

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) represent a very unique add to the learning environment. This is highlighted [4] who mentioned that these courses are the newest form of open educational resources advancement. (MOOCs) represent a very unique add to the learning environment. Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have the advantage of being available for all and open to unlimited number of students. In the language of numbers, confirmation of the ease of use and availability of MOOCs is provided by the fact of their use across 190 countries by 160,000 learners. According to [5], the success of MOOC is mainly determined by the interaction among participants facilitated by discussion forums. [6], [7] highlighted this fact and added that interaction is determined by the knowledge of the learners on the first place. Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are merely online courses for the purpose of education they are characterized by being accessible and scalable in the sense that anyone can access to them. They were first offered by the University of Manitoba in 2008 for the purpose of connective information [8]. In addition, the focus on social engagement extended to the small face-to-face groups that point towards a better influence on MOOCs in terms of completion [9], [10], [11]. Recently, research on MOOCs has shifted focus from learning to highlight the different factors related to attrition [12]. Social indication and discussion were proved not to be the biggest component of learners’ experiences. However, work has concentrated on internal work of learners’ experiences. The awareness of the limitation teaching resources have is the result of the much concentration on the smooth supply of efficient instructions as in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs).

Related work

A considerable volume of learners are able to participate in web-based study through MOOCs, which are one of their widely-accepted benefits. However, students’ decisions and conduct are possible variables affecting performance through MOOCs, yet there is a dearth of study into such issues. The correlation of successful finishing rates to the level of learner engagement in web-based forums was assessed in [13]. The issue of using MOOCs in the modern world as an online educational facilitator is still controversial and somewhat vague [14]. The reason behind this interest is the growth in the use of learning management systems (LMSs) within educational institutions including universities. Through the data recorded within, these systems can be used to improve the performance of learners [15]. Moreover, social learning resource that opens up avenues for high education students to validate and carry out creative work, support peer alumni, and provide and acquire support from the school. In this regards, the factors examined in higher education are; faculty use [16]. Furthermore, continuous-time clickstream data produced by online learners who use online courses is another reason behind this growing interest [17].

Theoretical frameworks and reference theories

Readiness is a concept proved to be of a great importance educational environment and that was stated in change management theories. This is due to its successful implementation. Readiness for change on the one hand and readiness for Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) are the two main types of Readiness. The former represented by the involvement possibility of organization members in change is described as a vital indictor to accept and support or refuse a change [18]. Expectation Confirmation Theory (ECT) is derived from marketing and it is related to the investigation of the current study. It has been developed by [19] and has been used heavily used by researchers since then in various field of knowledge such as sociology, social psychology, and public policy [20]. The theory uses the term ‘Disconfirmation’ in reference to the products’ performance when it meets the expected level ‘confirmation’. For MOOCs to be affective, certain components should be present mainly collaborative learning and communication through which students can learn and interact with others. A group of principles investigated and stated in chaos, network, and complexity and self-organization theories are combined together creating the theory of connectivism that forms that basis of MOOCs [21], [22]. Satisfaction and intention to use were the dynamics emphasised in the technology acceptance model (TAM), which was adopted for analysing MOOC improvement. The impact of MOOCs on learners’ learning performance was evidenced by the findings. It has the advantage of facilitating the learning process through offering materials and enabling the share of information. In terms of generating knowledge and providing a wide variety of data, MOOCs in the light of technology acceptance model (TAM) is considered vital to learning activities. There are several theories used in information systems researches but in this study, only theories concerning technology adoption are examined. These include the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) by [1], [2], the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) by [23] and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) by [3].

Research method

Marketing, service management and IT/IS are the three subject areas that are associated with the notion of on-going adoption of IT and IS. Additional databanks comprising articles that may have been overlooked were trawled using Google Scholar, in order to guarantee comprehensiveness. Additionally, further relevant papers were found by reading the bibliographies of the literature already collected. As a means of effectively searching the databases and identifying relevant literature, a number of processes were followed: Incorporation of unreleased working papers, Master׳s dissertations, doctoral theses, conference presentations and journal articles was made. Information systems and information technology search terms from the basis of using MOOCs were employed to search for the titles and abstracts of books and papers. Setting of the research parameters and search words was engaged in. ‘MOOC’ and ‘Massive Open Online Course’, as well as their plural forms, were the two basis search terms adopted. Secondly, following the approach of [24], [25] and as Table 6 shows, an initial search of the distance learning and educational technology field was made to identify several relevant journals. The Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, American Journal of Distance Education, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, as well as the British Journal of Education Technology were all identified. One journal appeared to include a limited number of relevant articles, however they were ultimately excluded from the systematic appraisal as they were inappropriate. This phenomenon potentially occurred due to single words within the terms being searched by the software, despite inverted commas being included to make the search terms complete phrases.
Table 6

Identified academic journals and search outcomes.

Title of journalNumber of resultsDate
British Journal of Educational Technology3413/04/2018
International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning3113/04/2018
American Journal of Distance Education1915/04/2018
Journal of Online Learning and Teaching1115/04/2018
Identified academic journals and search outcomes. As a third stage, numerous academic databases were subsequently searched using the key terms. As Table 7 shows, this included IEEEXplorer, ProQuest (ERIC, British Education Index and Australian Education Index, JSTOR׳s education journals, Scopus and ISI Web of Knowledge. The MOOC acronym did produce articles relating to certain fields such as ‘Management of Organisational Change’, as well as ‘Multiple Optical Orthogonal Code Sequences’, which were evidently irrelevant to the research.
Table 7

Search Results- Selected Academic Databases.

DatabasesSearch resultsDate
ISI web of knowledge4312/04/2018
Scopus10812/04/2018
JSTOR (education titles)3913/04/2018
ProQuest1913/04/2018
IEEE Explorer1013/04/2018
Search Results- Selected Academic Databases. Additionally, further analysis is required of questions relating to the ethical use of MOOC learners’ information, programmes’ cultural conflicts, as well as other thought-provoking study topics.
Subject areaPsychology
More specific subject areaSocial science “online learning”
Type of dataTables
How data were acquiredSystematic literature review
Data formatAnalyzed
Experimental factorsLiterature review
Experimental featuresSystematic review, higher education
Data source locationScopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, Springer, Emerald Fulltext, Taylor & Francis, Wiley InterScience, and Ingenta Journals. The Google Scholar search engine was also used to ensure the coverage of publications in other databases.
Data accessibilityData are with this article
Related research articleM. S. Othman, G. Tashimaimaiti, L.M. Yusuf, W.M. Al-Rahmi, End-User Perspectives on Effectiveness of Learning Performance through Massive Open Online Course (MOOCs). In International Conference of Reliable Information and Communication Technology, Springer, Cham. 2017, 699–707 [17].
  6 in total

1.  Current State and Future Trends: A Citation Network Analysis of the Academic Performance Field.

Authors:  Clara Martinez-Perez; Cristina Alvarez-Peregrina; Cesar Villa-Collar; Miguel Ángel Sánchez-Tena
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Enhancement of Medical Students' Performance and Motivation in Pathophysiology Courses: Shifting From Traditional Instruction to Blended Learning.

Authors:  Dan Wang; Junhai Zhou; Qiuhui Wu; Guannan Sheng; Xin Li; Huiling Lu; Jing Tian
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-01-26

3.  Approaches and perspectives for online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic and future chaos.

Authors:  Shagufta Nesar; Kiran Rafiq; Muhammad Rizwan; Syed Mehmood Hasan
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2021-05-20

4.  MOOC's impact on higher education.

Authors:  Noura Alhazzani
Journal:  Soc Sci Humanit Open       Date:  2020-06-02

5.  Perceived usability evaluation of Microsoft Teams as an online learning platform during COVID-19 using system usability scale and technology acceptance model in India.

Authors:  Debajyoti Pal; Vajirasak Vanijja
Journal:  Child Youth Serv Rev       Date:  2020-10-01

6.  Evaluating Course Completion, Appropriateness, and Burden in the Understanding Multiple Sclerosis Massive Open Online Course: Cohort Study.

Authors:  Suzi B Claflin; Julie A Campbell; Kathleen Doherty; Maree Farrow; Barnabas Bessing; Bruce V Taylor
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 5.428

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.