| Literature DB >> 30581896 |
Kosuke Sadahide1, Jun Teishima1, Shogo Inoue1, Takayuki Tamura2, Naosuke Kamei3,4, Nobuo Adachi3, Akio Matsubara1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Transurethral resection of a bladder tumor (TURBT) using a resectoscope has been standard treatment for bladder cancer. However, no treatment method promotes the repair of resected bladder tissue. The aim of this study was to examine the healing process of damaged bladder tissue after a transurethral injection of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) into the bladder. An injection of magnetic MSCs meant that they accumulated in the damaged area of the bladder. Another aim of this study was to compare the acceleration effect of MSC magnetic delivery on the repair of bladder tissue with that of non-magnetic MSC injection.Entities:
Keywords: BC, urinary bladder cancer; Bone marrow; Cancer; FA, flip angle; FBS, fetal bovine serum; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; MRI, Magnetic resonance imaging; MSC, mesenchymal stem cell; Mesenchymal stem cell; NEX, number of excitations; NMIBC, non-muscle invasive urinary bladder cancer; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; Regeneration; SPION, superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle; TE, echo time; TR, repetition time; TURBT, transurethral resection of bladder tumor; Transurethral resection; Urinary bladder; αSMA, α-smooth muscle actin
Year: 2018 PMID: 30581896 PMCID: PMC6299148 DOI: 10.1016/j.reth.2018.10.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Regen Ther ISSN: 2352-3204 Impact factor: 3.419
The characteristics of primers utilized for real-time polymerase chain reaction.
| Genes | Primer sequence forward | Primer sequence reverse |
|---|---|---|
| FGF1 | 5′-GTAAGCAACGCGCTTCTACG-3′ | 5′-GGGTTTGAGCCATCTCGGAA-3′ |
| FGF2 | 5′-GCTGTACTGCAAAAACGGGG-3′ | 5′-TTGCCTGGCCATTCAACAAAG-3′ |
| IL2 | 5′-GGCAAAAACTCTCATGGGGGA-3′ | 5′- ACTCGATGCTGAGATGATGCT-3′ |
Fig. 1Microscopic findings of cell block. In the MSC cells, there was no brown iron stained with (A, MSC M-x40) H&E, and no blue iron stained with (B, MSC M-x40) Berlin blue stain. There was brown iron stained with (C, MSC M+ x40) H&E and blue iron stained with (D, MSC M+ x40) Berlin blue stain.
Fig. 2A. The magnetic labeled MSCs dropping into PBS in a flask fell straight down by the by the force of gravity. B. When a neodymium magnet was set on one side of a flask, most of dropped MSCs was attracted to a magnet.
Fig. 3MRI findings of the rabbit bladder. The regeneration areas were surrounded by yellow dotted lines (arrows). In the control and MSC M-groups, there was a small amount regenerated tissue (A, control SAG, B MSC M- SAG). In the MSC M+ group, there was more regenerated tissue than in the other two groups (C, MSC M+).
Fig. 4Comparison of regenerated areas among three groups. In the MSC M+ group, the regenerated area was significantly larger than that in the control and MSC M-groups.
Fig. 5Macroscopic findings of the rabbit bladder in representative cases of control (A), MSC M- (B), and MSC M+(C) groups. In the control group, ulcer and edema were confirmed at the cauterization area (A). In the MSC M- and MSC M+ groups, ulcerative regions were replaced with regenerative tissues (B) and (C).
Fig. 6Histological findings of the rabbit bladder tissues stained with H&E (A–E) and αSMA (F–J). (A) There was a lack of urothelial cells, and the adhered necrotic tissue was stained with H&E (A). Smooth muscle stained with αSMA (F) was exposed at the surface of the bladder wall in the control group. There were several vessels stained with H&E (D), and myofibrous tissue stained with αSMA (G and I) was regenerated in the MSC M-group. Both vessels and fibrous tissue were abundant in the MSC M+ and MSC M-groups. Scale bar: A-C and F-H 2500 μm; D, E, I, and J 250 μm.
Fig. 7Size of the histological regenerated tissue in each group at 14 days. The regeneration areas (length x depth) were measured and compared. In the MSC M+ group, the regeneration area was significantly larger than those in the control and MSC M-groups (p = 0.0433, p = 0.0209).
Fig. 8The mRNA expressions of FGF-1, FGF-2, and IL-2 in the repair tissues at 14 days after surgery. There was no significantly difference among the three groups.