| Literature DB >> 30581572 |
Ghulam Nabi1,2, Yujiang Hao1, Todd R Robeck3, Zheng Jinsong1, Ding Wang1.
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to investigate the effects of habitat and biological state on the physiology of critically endangered wild and semi-natural Yangtze Finless Porpoises (YFPs; Neophocaena asiaeorientalis ssp. asiaeorientalis) by measuring and comparing serum biochemical parameters. A total of 168 YFPs were sampled, 68 living in the semi-natural (Tian-E-Zhou Oxbow) and 98 living in the wild (Poyang Lake, PL) environment. The YFPs in the Tian-E-Zhou Oxbow were sampled from 2002 to 2015 and in the PL from 2009 to 2017. Each population was divided into Juvenile Male, Juvenile Female, Adult Male, Pregnant and Lactating Female life history categories. Overall, with location, 19/33 of the analytes and with season 18/33 of the analytes were significantly different. Similarly, within each location, 15/33 of the analytes changed with time in PL while only 8/33 changed with time in Tian-E-Zhou Oxbow, respectively. Finally, 15/33 of the analytes demonstrated significant differences between the different age and sex groups of animals. In our study, a significant variation, as well as an increasing and decreasing pattern of several parameters in both populations, suggest a worsening ecological environment of both habitats. This study will help in health assessment, improving conservation and management practices, a crucial requisite for biodiversity conservation.Entities:
Keywords: Cetacean; Yangtze Finless Porpoise; biochemistry; critically endangered; habitat dynamics; hepatic profile; lipid profile
Year: 2018 PMID: 30581572 PMCID: PMC6298535 DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coy072
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Conserv Physiol ISSN: 2051-1434 Impact factor: 3.079
Basic information of the studied animals in Tian-E-Zhou Oxbow.
| Status | ID | BL (cm) | BW (Kg) | Year/season | Status | ID | BL (cm) | BW (Kg) | Year/season |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JM | 02T-M1 | 114 | 23 | 2002 | AM | 06-T-M04 | 164 | 73.2 | |
| JM | 02T-M03 | 129 | 42 | (Fall) | AM | 06-T-M06 | 148 | 65.5 | |
| JM | 04-T-M04 | 123 | 34 | 2004 (summer) | AM | 08-T-M02 | 161 | 68.75 | 2008 (spring) |
| JM | 06-T-M07 | 134 | 42 | 2006 | AM | 08-T-M03 | 161 | 70.5 | |
| JM | 06-T-M08 | 137 | 49.4 | (spring) | AM | 08-T-M07 | 162 | 77 | |
| JM | 08-T-M01 | 133 | 38.6 | 2008 | AM | 08-T-M08 | 160 | 69 | |
| JM | 08-T-M04 | 133 | 39.5 | (spring) | AM | 08-T-M12 | 146 | 49 | |
| JM | 08-T-M06 | 114 | 29.6 | AM | 08-T-M13 | 142 | 53 | ||
| JM | 08-T-M09 | 120 | 33.75 | AM | 10-T-M01 | 166 | 61.3 | 2010 | |
| JM | 08-T-M10 | 134 | 44 | AM | 10-T-M02 | 163 | 69.9 | (Fall) | |
| JM | 08-T-M11 | 118 | 34 | AM | 10-T-M03 | 158 | 70.6 | ||
| JM | 10-T-M09 | 121 | 36.5 | 2010 | AM | 10-T-M04 | 165 | 68.8 | |
| JM | 10-T-M10 | 126 | 35 | (Fall) | AM | 10-T-M06 | 143 | 48.4 | |
| JM | T15M07 | 125 | 31.4 | 2015 | AM | 10-T-M07 | 142 | 47.9 | |
| JM | T15M18 | 133 | 35.2 | (Fall) | AM | 10-T-M08 | 145 | 47.6 | |
| AM | 02T-M01 | 152 | 53 | 2002 | AM | T15M02 | 139 | 35.5 | 2015 |
| AM | 02T-M02 | 158 | 59.05 | (Fall) | AM | T15M05 | 141 | 36.8 | (winter) |
| AM | 02T-M04 | 155 | 57.5 | AM | T15M08 | 148 | 40.8 | ||
| AM | 02T-M05 | 139 | 43 | AM | T15M09 | 160 | 42 | ||
| AM | 02T-M06 | 156 | 55.4 | AM | T15M12 | 151 | 44.5 | ||
| AM | 02T-M07 | 157 | 54.3 | AM | T15M17 | 156 | 46.1 | ||
| AM | 03T-M02 | 141 | 32.7 | 2003 | P | 08-T-F03 | 136 | 59 | 2008 |
| AM | 03T-M03 | 146 | 46.15 | (Fall) | P | 08-T-F05 | 140 | 53.25 | (spring) |
| AM | 03T-M04 | 158 | 57 | P | 08-T-F06 | 148 | 71.5 | ||
| AM | 03T-M05 | 142 | 41.4 | P | 08-T-F07 | 152 | 63.75 | ||
| AM | 03T-M06 | 149 | 50.15 | P | 08-T-F09 | 149 | 67.5 | ||
| AM | 03T-M07 | 157 | 55.1 | P | TEZ 18 | 149.5 | 51.1 | 2015 | |
| AM | 03T-M08 | 154 | 55.8 | P | TEZ 19 | 143 | 55.3 | (winter) | |
| AM | 04-T-M01 | 159 | 59.35 | 2004 | P | TEZ 21 | 147.5 | 53.4 | |
| AM | 04-T-M02 | 147 | 43.45 | (Fall) | P | TEZ 25 | 139 | 45.8 | |
| AM | 04-T-M03 | 147 | 48.45 | L | 10-T-F01 | 148 | 2010 | ||
| AM | 04-T-M05 | 149 | 50.45 | L | 10-T-F03 | 140 | 51.2 | (Fall) | |
| AM | 04-T-M06 | 149 | 48.7 | L | 10-T-F04 | 149 | 56 | ||
| AM | 06-T-M01 | 149 | 50.2 | 2006 | L | 10-T-F09 | 140 | 58 | |
| AM | 06-T-M02 | 158 | 73.2 | (spring) | |||||
| AM | 06-T-M03 | 156 | 55.55 |
Basic information of the studied animals in Poyang Lake.
| Status | ID | BL (cm) | BW (Kg) | Year/season | Status | ID | BL (cm) | BW (Kg) | Year/season |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JM | 09PYM006 | 128 | 36.95 | 2009 | AM | 15PY-M09 | 160 | 57.2 | |
| JM | 09PYM008 | 127 | 36 | (winter) | AM | 15PY-M10 | 152 | 53.8 | |
| JM | 09PYM009 | 136 | 39.1 | AM | 15PY-M12 | 138 | 46.8 | ||
| JM | 09PYM017 | 127 | 34.7 | AM | 15PY-M13 | 154 | 51.2 | ||
| JM | 09PYM020 | 125 | 38.1 | AM | 17PYM15 | 145 | 49 | 2017 | |
| JM | 10PYM03 | 127 | 35.1 | 2010 | AM | 17PYM06 | 150 | 45.1 | (spring) |
| JM | 10PYM04 | 114 | 30.9 | (spring) | AM | 17PYM14 | 142 | 49.7 | |
| JM | 11PYM03 | 124 | 39.2 | 2011 | AM | 17PYM07 | 146 | 47.7 | |
| JM | 11PYM04 | 124 | 35.3 | (winter) | JF | 10PYF05 | 128 | 34.8 | 2010 |
| JM | 11PYM06 | 137 | 45.4 | JF | 10PYF07 | 119 | 25.9 | (spring) | |
| JM | 11PYM07 | 113 | 37.1 | JF | 11PYF02 | 127 | 39.3 | 2011 | |
| JM | 11PYM08 | 113 | 35 | JF | 11PYF05 | 124 | 36 | (winter) | |
| JM | 11PYM09 | 124 | 33.6 | JF | 11PYF07 | 118 | 37.3 | ||
| JM | 11PYM11 | 116 | 38 | JF | 11PYF09 | 128 | 39 | ||
| JM | 11PYM14 | 124 | 39.5 | JF | 11PYF10 | 112 | 32.5 | ||
| JM | 11PYM15 | 116 | 39.4 | JF | 11PYF11 | 123 | 32.8 | ||
| JM | 15PY-M01 | 122 | 36.8 | 2015 | JF | 11PYF19 | 119 | 33 | |
| JM | 15PY-M05 | 124 | 24 | (spring) | JF | 11PYF23 | 115 | 36 | |
| JM | 15PY-M07 | 112 | 31.8 | JF | 11PYF14 | 128 | |||
| JM | 15PY-M11 | 129 | 37.6 | JF | 15PY-F04 | 115 | 34.7 | 2015 | |
| JM | 15PY-M14 | 129 | 35.7 | JF | 15PY-F10 | 123 | 40.3 | (spring) | |
| JM | 17PYM02 | 135.2 | 40.4 | 2017 | JF | 15PY-F12 | 127 | 45.7 | |
| JM | 17PYM10 | 128 | 39.2 | (spring) | JF | 15PY-F17 | 125 | 36.3 | |
| JM | 17PYM01 | 130 | 39.4 | JF | 17PYF14 | 122 | 33 | 2017 | |
| JM | 17PYM16 | 132 | 41.9 | JF | 17PYF10 | 118 | 27.7 | (spring) | |
| AM | 09PYM004 | 154 | 53 | 2009 | P | 09PYF002 | 145 | 62.9 | 2009 |
| AM | 09PYM007 | 150 | 53.5 | (winter) | P | 09PYF003 | 144 | 52.2 | (winter) |
| AM | 09PYM010 | 158 | 83.4 | P | 09PYF007 | 152 | |||
| AM | 09PYM011 | 138 | 40.6 | P | 10PYF01 | 138 | 50.6 | 2010 | |
| AM | 09PYM013 | 154 | 52.2 | P | 10PYF04 | 149 | 63.6 | (spring) | |
| AM | 09PYM014 | 150 | 52.4 | P | 10PYF06 | 146 | 62.7 | ||
| AM | 09PYM015 | 153 | 53.4 | P | 11PYF04 | 147 | 66.7 | 2011 | |
| AM | 09PYM016 | 158 | 62.1 | P | 11PYF06 | 140 | 60.4 | (winter) | |
| AM | 09PYM018 | 157 | 48.4 | P | 11PYF08 | 130 | 63.6 | ||
| AM | 09PYM021 | 146 | 46.8 | P | 11PYF13 | 139 | 63 | ||
| AM | 10PYM01 | 149 | 38.1 | 2010 | P | 11PYF15 | 129 | 55 | |
| AM | 10PYM05 | 152 | 47.4 | (spring) | P | 11PYF16 | 137 | 63.5 | |
| AM | 11PYM01 | 168 | 67.2 | 2011 | P | 11PYF18 | 148 | 61.1 | |
| AM | 11PYM02 | 166 | 74.1 | (winter) | P | 11PYF20 | 151 | 72.3 | |
| AM | 11PYM05 | 140 | 49 | P | 11PYF21 | 138 | 69.9 | ||
| AM | 11PYM10 | 149 | 62 | P | 15PY-F22 | 138 | 67.5 | 2015 | |
| AM | 11PYM13 | 146 | 48.6 | P | 15PY-F19 | 134 | 58.7 | (spring) | |
| AM | 11PYM16 | 148 | 51.6 | P | 15PY-F18 | 148 | |||
| AM | 11PYM17 | 150 | 59.1 | P | 15PY-F15 | 134 | 60.2 | ||
| AM | 11PYM20 | 152 | 73.4 | P | 15PY-F05 | 147 | 72.1 | ||
| AM | 15PY-M03 | 153 | 54.4 | 2015 | P | 17PYF11 | 160 | 2017 | |
| AM | 15PY-M04 | 158 | 69.8 | (spring) | P | 17PYF04 | 148 | 62.1 | (spring) |
| AM | 15PY-M06 | 144 | 53.1 | P | 17PYF16 | 140 | 58.9 | ||
| AM | 15PY-M08 | 145 | 49.8 | P | 17PYF02 | 162 |
Effect of habitat (PL and TZO) and time (years, 2002 to 2015 for TZO and 2009 to 2017 for PL) while controlling for season and groups (JM, JF, AM, PF, LF) on biochemical analytes (marginal mean, lower 95% CI to higher 95% CI) from YFPs.
| Analyte | Poyang Lake (PL) | Time PLa | Tian-E-Zhou Oxbow (TZO) | Time TZOa | Location | Seasonal Sidak Comparisonc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coef., | Coef., | |||||
| ALT (U/l) | 31.7, 28.5–35.3 | −0.0476, 0.01 | 39.1, 34.2 to 44.8 | NSD | 0.03 | S < W & F |
| AST (U/l) | 197.2, 185.1–209.4 | −5.973, 0.002 | 218.9, 203.7–234.1 | NSD | 0.05 | S < W & F |
| AST/ALT | 6.3, 5.7–6.9 | NSD | 5.5, 4.8–6.3 | NSD | NSD | NSD |
| GGT (U/l) | 38.0, 35.6–40.6 | −0.0302, 0.008- | 40.3, 36.9–44.0 | NSD | NSD | NSD |
| ALP (U/l) | 130.2, 112.0–151.3 | 0.0532, 0.03 | 170.0, 141.1–204.8 | NSD | NSD | NSD |
| TBA (μmol/l) | 4.16, 3.47–5.0 | NSD | 8.0, 6.39–10.0 | NSD | < 0.0001 | F < W |
| T-BILI (μmol/l) | 3.37, 2.85–3.94 | NSD | 2.71 2.15–3.34 | 0.0562, 0.001 | NSD | NSD |
| D-BILI (μmol/l) | 0.69, 0.52–0.87 | NSD | 1.01, 0.77–1.3 | 0.0514, < 0.001 | 0.06 | S & Sm & F < W |
| I-BILI (μmol/l) | 1.99, 1.16–2.47 | NSD | 1.42, 1.09–1.9 | 0.0604, 0.01 | NSD | NSD |
| TP (g/l) | 76.4, 74.7–78.0 | NSD | 70.3, 68.5–72.3 | NSD | <0.0001 | NSD |
| ALB (g/l) | 43.8, 41.9–45.7 | NSD | 50.6, 48.1–53.2 | −0.762, 0.039 | 0.0002 | W < S |
| GLB (g/l) | 32.8, 30.7–34.9 | NSD | 18.4, 15.7–21.2 | NSD | <0.0001 | S < W |
| ALB/GLB | 1.34, 1.16–1.55 | NSD | 3.53, 2.91–4.30 | NSD | <0.0001 | W < S |
| BUN (mmol/l) | 17.6, 16.8–18.5 | NSD | 18.5, 17.4–19.6 | NSD | NSD | NSD |
| UA (μmol/l) | 48.2, 41.1–56.4 | −0.1024, <0.001 | 41.3, 34.0–50.2 | NSD | NSD | S < W |
| TC (mmol/l) | 5.5, 5.11–5.83 | −0.1997, 0.01 | 6.40, 5.97–6.82 | NSD | 0.004 | NSD |
| TG (mmol/l) | 4.26, 3.44–5.27 | NSD | 2.37, 1.84–3.04 | NSD | 0.002 | NSD |
| HDL-C (mmol/l) | 2.36, 2.21–2.50 | −0.232, <0.001 | 3.21, 3.03–3.39 | NSD | <0.0001 | S & F < W |
| LDL-C (mmol/l) | 1.75, 1.50–2.04 | 0.1128, <0.001 | 1.83, 1.50–2.22 | −0.1442, <0.001 | NSD | W < F |
| HDL-C/LDL-C | 5.81, 4.65–7.26 | −2.175, <0.001 | 8.07, 6.15–10.59 | NSD | NSD | S & F < W |
| CK (U/l) | 90.3, 75.1–106.9 | −1.064, <0.001 | 156.9, 132.0–183.9 | NSD | 0.0001 | S < W |
| LDH (U/l) | 224.0, 203.8–246.2 | 0.067, <0.001 | 233.8, 207.5–263.3 | NSD | NSD | F & W < S |
| AMS (U/l) | 15.6, 11.6–20.1 | 8.577, < 0.001 | 4.57, 2.11–8.0 | NSD | 0.0005 | F < W |
| Glucose (mmol/l) | 7.64, 7.37–7.91 | NSD | 7.99, 7.6–8.38 | NSD | NSD | W < F & S |
| CO2 (mmol/l) | 21.6, 20.3–22.8 | NSD | 26.3, 24.2–28.5 | NSD | 0.002 | NSD |
| Cr (μmol/l) | 75.3, 71.0–80.0 | NSD | 78.1, 72.5–84.2 | NSD | NSD | F < S |
| K+ (mmol/l) | 4.4, 4.2–4.5 | NSD | 4.0, 3.8–4.2 | −0.012, 0.08 | 0.032 | NSD |
| Na+ (mmol/l) | 156.7, 155.8–157.6 | NSD | 152.8, 151.7–154.0 | −0.344, 0.003 | <0.0001 | NSD |
| Cl− (mmol/l) | 108.7, 107.8–109.4 | NSD | 108.3 107.3–109.4 | −0.3345, 0.005 | NSD | W & S < F |
| Ca2+ (mmol/l) | 2.56, 2.53–2.60 | −0.0135, 0.008 | 2.47, 2.42–2.51 | NSD | 0.003 | NSD |
| PO4 | 1.58, 2.45–1.70 | 0.0838, <0.001 | 1.28, 1.12–1.43 | NSD | 0.013 | W & S < F |
| Mg2+ (mmol/l) | 2.26, 2.15–2.37 | 0.0584, 0.003 | 2.06, 1.95–2.18 | NSD | 0.05 | NSD |
| Fe2+ (μmol/l) | 27.6, 23.2–32.3 | NSD | 33.9, 27.4–41.1 | NSD | NSD | NSD |
NSD: Not significantly different (P > 0.05). JM = juvenile male, JF = juvenile female, AM = adult male, PF = pregnant female, LF = lactating female.
aResults of linear regression using time as the independent variable for analyte data (dependent variable, across all years and animal groups) calculated separately for each location.
bSignificance (P ≤ 0.05) determined by location (TZ vs. PL) specific marginal mean (controlled for variance due to group and season) post hoc sidak comparison of the respective biochemical analytes.
cSignificance (P ≤ 0.05) determined for season (W = winter, S = spring, Sm = summer, F = fall) specific marginal mean (controlled for variance due to group and location) post hoc sidak comparison of the respective biochemical analytes. Only significantly different seasons are shown.
Figure 1:Overall marginal mean (±95% confidence interval) biochemical analyte comparisons in YFP from different groups (JM = juvenile male, JF = Juvenile female, AM = adult male, PF = non-lactating, pregnant female, LF = non-pregnant, lactating female). Marginal mean concentration for each analyte were controlled for variance due to location (TZO and PL) and season. Each biochemical parameter followed by an alternate letter was significantly different at P ≤ 0.05.
Figure 2:Overall comparison of the biochemical parameters between the Tian-E-Zhou Oxbow (T) and Poyang Lake (P) YFPs. The figures (a, b) compared the biochemical parameters between the T and P juvenile males. The figures (c, d, e) indicate biochemical differences in the adult males between T and P animals. The biochemical differences in pregnant groups are indicated by figures (f, g) between the T and P animals. The significant differences between the two populations are indicated by asterisk at P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001.