| Literature DB >> 30581315 |
S Samara Shekar Reddy1, Bharat Singh1, A J Peter2, T Venkateswar Rao2,3.
Abstract
Rice being the staple food of middle and south India, there is an extensive research undertaken in protecting the species and improving the quality and yield. Several recombinations have been made to the rice genome to impart various qualities which lack in the pure breed. Oryza faces various natural stress, like temperature variance, high salinity, etc., drought is one of the major parameters affecting the growth and yield of the plant. Transgenic rice cultivars can be generated for drought tolerance using the Agrobacterium mediated transformations. The current work aims to impart the gene for drought tolerance in Oryza sativa L. using Agrobacterium mediated transformation. The gene targeted in this context is dehydration response element binding factors (DREB). DREB plays a major role in response to drought mediated stress. Sambha mahsuri (Indica type) and Cotton dora sannalu (Indica type) the two local cultivars have been transformed for the gene AtDREB1A under 35s CaMV promoters (pBIH binary vector) for which the vector used was Agrobacterium. The target plant tissue being used was calli. Optimization of the parameters was performed for a lethal dose of hygromycin, cefotaxime level, and acetosyringone level. PCR amplification was used for the confirmation of the transgenic (T 0) species in which 23% and 18% for Sambha mahsuri and Cotton dora sannalu, respectively. Southern blotting was performed for the genomic DNA. Normal growth was shown by the T 1 transgenic plants whose expression was confirmed by RT-PCR. The T 1 transgenic plants showed good tolerance to drought mediated stress for a total period of one and a half week under greenhouse condition. The study can be concluded by producing a potentially successful drought resistance T 1 species produced using Agrobacterium mediated transformation.Entities:
Keywords: 2,4-D, 2,4-diphenoxyacetic acid; ABA, abscisic acid; Acetosyringone; Agrobacterium mediated transformation; BA, 6-benzylaminopurine; CMV, cauli flower mosaic virus; Cefotaxime; Constitutive promoter; DREB, dehydration responsive elements binding factors; Dehydration responsive element; Drought tolerance; Hygromycin; NAA, naphthaleneacetic acid; PCR amplification; RM, regeneration media
Year: 2016 PMID: 30581315 PMCID: PMC6302895 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.01.035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 1319-562X Impact factor: 4.219
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the structure of the T-DNA region in the plasmid pBIHCaMV35SDREB1A. LB left border, T-G7 terminator, hpt hygromycin phosphotransferase gene, P-NOS promoter, 35s CaMV promoter, DREB1A gene, TNOS terminator of nopaline synthase gene, RB right border.
Media used for callus induction and regeneration.
| Type of media | Culture time | Media composition |
|---|---|---|
| Callus induction medium | 14 days | N6 salts, 2,4-D (2 mg/l, 3 mg/l and 4 mg/l), casein hydrolysate 0.3 g/l, myoinositol 0.1 g/l, sucrose 3%, gellan gum agar 0.3%, pH 5.8 |
| Callus maintenance medium | 06 days | N6 salts, 2,4-D 2 mg/l, Vits., casein hydrolysate 0.3 mg/l, myoinositol 0.1 mg/l, sucrose 3%, gellan gum agar 0.3%, pH 5.8 |
| Regeneration media | 3–4 weeks | MS medium, vitamins, 0.1 gm/l myoinositol, sucrose 3%, gellan gum agar 0.3%, pH 5.8, kinetin 0.5 mg/l, NAA:BAP (RM I = 1:2, RM II = 1:3 and RM III = 1:4) |
Media used for transformation.
| Type of media | Culture time | Media composition |
|---|---|---|
| Bacterial suspension medium | 2 days | LB medium, sucrose 3%, acetosyringone 100 μM, pH 7 |
| Pre-induction medium | 1 day | MS salts, sucrose 3%, acetosyringone100 μM, pH 7 |
| Infection medium | 5–10 min | Pre-induction medium (O.D600 of 0.4) |
| Co-cultivation medium | 1–3 days | N6 salts, 2,4-D 2 mg/l, casein hydrolysate 0.3 g/l, myoinositol 0.1 g/l, sucrose 3%, acetosyringone (100 μM, 200 μM, 300 μM), gellan gum agar 0.3%, pH 5.8 |
| Washing medium | 10 min | MS basal medium, sucrose 30 g/l, cefotaxime 500 mg/l, pH 5.8 |
| Selection medium | 3–4 weeks | MS salts, 2,4-D 2 mg/l, hygromycin (75 mg/l), sucrose 30%, cefotaxime (300 mg/l, 500 mg/l, 700 mg/l), gellan gum agar 0.3%, pH 5.8 |
| Regeneration medium | 3–4 weeks | MS basal medium, sucrose 3%, BAP, NAA (RM III = SM and RM II = CDS) kinetin 0.5 mg/l, hygromycin 25 mg/l, gellan gum agar 0.3%, pH 5.8 |
| Rooting medium | 2 weeks | MS salts, sucrose 3%, NAA 1 mg/l, hygromycin 25 mg/l, gellan gum agar 3%, pH 5.8 |
RM = regeneration media, SM = Sambha mahsuri, CDS = Cotton dora sannalu.
Callus induction and regeneration frequency of two rice cultivars (Sambha mahsuri and Cotton dora sannalu).
| Callus induction | Regeneration (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,4-D (mg/l) | SM (%) | CDS (%) | Regeneration media | SM (%) | CDS (%) |
| 2 | 39.27 ± 2.16a (81.14) | 31.07 ± 1.13b (64.69) | RM I | 22.57 ± 1.10c (41.08) | 12.36 ± 1.75e (26.09) |
| 3 | 37.29 ± 1.43ab (77.66) | 34.37 ± 0.73ab (71.63) | RM II | 29.67 ± 0.97b (62.64) | 27.84 ± 1.76b (58.43) |
| 4 | 28.07 ± 1.19b (60.48) | 36.76 ± 1.46a (75.93) | RM III | 42.35 ± 0.88a (87.09) | 14.96 ± 0.76d (30.55) |
Mean values followed by the same letter with a column shows no significant diff. (p ⩽ 0.05).
Figure 2Callus induction and regeneration. (A) Callus induction of Sambha mahsuri. (A1) Callus induction of Cotton dora sannalu. (B) Maintenance of Sambha mahsuri. (B1) Maintenance of Cotton dora sannalu and (C) Regeneration of Sambha mahsuri. (C1) Regeneration of Cotton dora sannalu.
Determination of lethal dose of hygromycin for calli selection.
| Hygromycin (mg/l) | Genotype | Calli survived (14 days) | Calli survived (24 days) | Range (5%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | SM | 19.46 ± 0.47 | 14.83 ± 1.07 | a |
| CDS | 15.72 ± 0.78 | 09.96 ± 1.23 | ||
| 50 | SM | 13.08 ± 0.49 | 09.80 ± 1.03 | b |
| CDS | 09.06 ± 1.32 | 06.32 ± 1.13 | ||
| 75 | SM | 04.31 ± 1.00 | 01.36 ± 0.16 | c |
| CDS | 02.13 ± 0.13 | 00.00 ± 000 |
Mean values followed by the same letter within a column shows no significant differences (p ⩽ 0.05).
Figure 3Percentage of hygromycin resistant calli recovered after co-cultivation on selection media. Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Determination of effective dose of cefotaxime for elimination of Agrobacterium.
| Cefotaxime (mg/l) | Genotype | Range (5%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | SM | 39.20 ± 1.34 | A |
| CDS | 23.39 ± 0.31 | ||
| 50 | SM | 09.97 ± 0.23 | B |
| CDS | 06.54 ± 0.37 | ||
| 75 | SM | 00 | C |
| CDS | 00 |
Mean values followed by the same letter within a column shows no significant differences (p ⩽ 0.05).
Figure 4Different phases of transgenic plant development after co-cultivation. (A) Calli selection after co-cultivation. (B) Transformed calli with green spots. (C) Putative transgenic plantlet regeneration. (D) Acclimatization of transgenic plantlets under greenhouse condition.
Figure 5Transgenic plant recovered from each hygromycin resistant calli. Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Figure 6PCR Lane 1: marker, Lane 1–7: transgenic plants (SM), Lane 7–13 transgenic plants (CDS),C−ve = −VE: control plant and C+ve = +VE: positive sample (Gene construct).
Figure 7Southern blotting of the T0 transgenic rice plants with each lane is representing the copy number of the transgenic lines. Lane 1: control, Lane 2: transgenic lines, Lane 3: transgenic lines of CDS of SM, Lane 4 and Lane 5: positive control Lane 6: negative control.
Figure 8RT-PCR analysis of T1 independent transgenic lines: M: ladder, Lane 1–9: transgenic plants of SM and CDS (AtDREB1A amplified fragment of 632 bp), 10 and Lane 11: control plant.
Reverse transcriptase-PCR analysis of transgenic rice lines and the survival rate of transgenic rice lines after one week of drought stress.
| Transgenic lines | Reverse analysis | Transcriptase-PCR Survival rate of transgenic rice lines after drought stress |
|---|---|---|
| Control | − | Died |
| SM (1) | + | Survived |
| SM(2) | + | Survived |
| SM(3) | + | Survived |
| SM (4) | + | Survived |
| SM (5) | + | Survived |
| CDS (1) | + | Survived |
| CDS (2) | + | Survived |
| CDS (3) | + | Survived |
| CDS (4) | + | Survived |
+ Represents RT-PCR positive transgenic plants and − represents RT-PCR negative control plants.
Fresh weight of transgenic and controlled plants (2 plants/sample) for four consecutive weeks in glass house at normal condition.
| Time period sowing (weeks) | After seed fresh weight in gm (control plants) | Fresh weight in gm (transgenic plants) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.47 ± 0.037 | 0.44 ± 0.016 |
| 2 | 1.12 ± 0.027 | 0.98 ± 0.029 |
| 3 | 2.03 ± 0.042 | 1.97 ± 0.031 |
| 4 | 3.74 ± 0.029 | 3.29 ± 0.028 |