| Literature DB >> 30581243 |
Abstract
Adoption of new agricultural technologies is always at the center of policy interest in developing countries. In reality, despite the visible benefits of many of the new agricultural technologies, including machinery and management practices, farmers either do not adopt them or it takes a long time to begin the adoption process and scaling up. To enhance the provision of irrigation using surface water and to enhance irrigation efficiency, Bangladesh has been trying to introduce the axial-flow-pump (AFP) appropriate for surface water irrigation, which can lift up to 55% more water, conditional on the water head, than a conventional centrifugal pump. Despite the visible benefits of the AFP, the uptake of the AFP for irrigation is low in the targeted zone of Bangladesh. The present study demonstrates that the new technology must be modified to adapt to local demand and specifications. Most importantly, the price of the new technology must be competitive with the prices of the existing available substitute technologies to ensure a rapid uptake and scaling up of this new agricultural technology.Entities:
Keywords: Adoption; Axial-flow-pump; Centrifugal pump; Farmer; Irrigation; Low-lift-pump; Perception; Price; Society; Technology
Year: 2018 PMID: 30581243 PMCID: PMC6289226 DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.07.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Technol Soc ISSN: 0160-791X
Fig. 1Panel (a) an axial flow pump in operation; Panel (b) inside an axial flow pump; Panel (c) a low-lift pump.
Fig. 2Location of the sampled irrigation service providers using AFPs in the sampled eight districts of Bangladesh.
Type of AFP deployed by the price of an AFP (after subsidy) and the length of the pump.
| Length (feet) | Diameter (inch) | Price per AFP | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9700 | 11000 | 11500 | 12000 | 12500 | 12700 | 14500 | |||
| 14 | 4″ | 1 | |||||||
| 5″ | |||||||||
| 6″ | 1 | ||||||||
| 16 | 4″ | 20 | |||||||
| 5″ | 6 | ||||||||
| 6″ | 14 | ||||||||
| 18 | 4″ | 2 | |||||||
| 5″ | |||||||||
| 6″ | 2 | ||||||||
| 20 | 4″ | 12 | 47 | ||||||
| 5″ | 18 | ||||||||
| 6″ | 17 | ||||||||
| Total | 12 | 6 | 1 | 14 | 2 | 18 | 17 | 70 | |
Information on human and physical capital of the sampled service providers.
| Characteristics | All | Expressed interest to purchase AFP after use | a-b Mean difference, t-statistic and the level of significance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes (a) | No (b) | |||
| No. of service providers | 70 | 55 | 15 | |
| Average price willing to pay (BDT) | 9672.86 (5278.31) | 12310.91 (1587.88) | ||
| % Service provider from Bhola District | 44.29 (50.03) | 43.64 (50.05) | 46.67 (51.64) | |
| % Service provider from Barishal District | 35.71 (48.26) | 38.18 (49.03) | 26.67 (45.77) | |
| % Service provider from other than Bhola and Barishal districts | 20.0 (40.2) | 18.2 (38.9) | 26.7 (45.8) | |
| Land area (ha) provided irrigation services in 2014-15 | 9.76 (5.16) | 10.3 (4.65) | 7.80 (6.54) | 2.49* (1.67) |
| No. of client farmers in 2014-15 | 24 (16) | 26 (16) | 20 (12) | 6* (1.45) |
| Age, service provider | 39.20 (9.30) | 39.49 (9.28) | 38.13 (9.63)) | 1.36 (0.50) |
| Years of schooling, service provider | 6.64 (3.75) | 6.51 (3.81) | 7.13 (3.62) | −0.62 (−0.57) |
| % Service provider with non-farm sector as the major occupation | 17.14 (37.96) | 10.9 (8.34) | 40.0 (50.7) | −29.09*** (2.75) |
| Years of experience as an irrigation service provider | 11.31 (8.00) | 10.89 (8.35) | 12.90 (6.60) | −1.98 (−0.85) |
| Years of schooling, spouse | 6.64 (3.63) | 6.40 (3.70) | 7.53 (3.31) | −1.13 (−1.07) |
| No. of earners in the family | 1.64 (0.92) | 1.53 (0.84) | 2.07 (1.10) | -.054** (2.07) |
| % Used two-wheeled tractor to run AFP | 25.71 (44.02) | 30.91 (46.64) | 6.67 (25.82) | 24.24** (1.93) |
| % Irrigated only | 72.86 (44.79) | 74.55 (43.96) | 66.67 (48.80) | 7.87 (0.60) |
| Discharge diameter of the pump (inches) | 5.31 (0.75) | 5.33 (74.67) | 5.27 (79.88) | 0.06 (0.27) |
| Pump length (feet) | 18.71 (1.90) | 18.65 (1.93) | 18.93 (1.83) | 0.28 (0.50) |
Notes: Differences = Mean (a) – Mean (b). H0: Diff = 0, H1: Diff ≠ 0 (two sided t-test). Values in parentheses are t-values. *Significant at the 10% level; ** significant at the 5% level and ***significant at the 1% level.
Ranking by the sampled service providers on the selected attributes of an AFP and centrifugal pump (1 = not satisfied at all, 4 = maximum satisfaction).
| Attributes of the machine | All sampled service provider | Ranking on attributes based on whether or not will purchase an AFP | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| On AFP | On centrifugal pump | |||||
| AFP | Centrifugal pump | Yes | No | Yes | No | |
| Water lifting | 3.7 (0.51) | 2.29 (0.80) | 3.7 (0.47) | 3.6 (0.6) | 2.3 (0.85) | 2.3 (0.62) |
| Fuel saving | 3.5 (0.70) | 2.14 (0.71) | 3.5 (0.69) | 3.4 (0.74) | 2.1 (0.73) | 2.1 (0.64) |
| Labor saving | 3.6 (0.58) | 1.80 (0.71) | 3.6 (0.49) | 3.3 (0.82) | 1.7 (0.73) | 2.0 (0.65) |
| Priming | 3.9 (0.26) | 1.56 (0.83) | 3.9 (0.19) | 3.8 (0.41) | 1.5 (0.86) | 1.6 (0.74) |
| Availability of spare parts | 3.2 (1.08) | 3.09 (1.06) | 3.22 (1.10) | 3.2 (1.01) | 3.0 (1.08) | 3.3 (0.98) |
| Availability of mechanical service | 3.2 (1.09) | 3.13 (1.02) | 3.3 (1.12) | 2.9 (0.96) | 3.1 (1.02) | 3.3 (1.03) |
| Engine cooling system | 3.0 (1.01) | 3.3 (0.89) | 3.1 (1.02) | 2.9 (1.03) | 3.3 (0.95) | 3.4 (0.63) |
| Easiness to operate | 3.6 (0.54) | 2.73 (0.98) | 3.7 (0.46) | 3.3 (0.72) | 2.7 (1.02) | 2.7 (0.82) |
| Setting with engine and machine | 3.2 (0.94) | 3.2 (1.0) | 3.3 (0.94) | 2.8 (0.86) | 3.2 (1.0) | 3.3 (1.03) |
| Mobility of the machine | 3.6 (0.66) | 2.43 (0.89) | 3.6 (0.71) | 3.7 (0.46) | 2.4 (0.93) | 2.5 (0.74) |
| Overall satisfaction level | 3.7 (0.50) | 2.4 (0.79) | 3.7 (0.51) | 3.7 (0.49) | 2.3 (0.78) | 2.5 (0.83) |
Reported reduction in fuel and wage costs from using an AFP for irrigation.
| Characteristics | Average of all sampled respondents |
|---|---|
| % Reported reduced fuel cost | 92.9 (25.9) |
| Actual value of fuel saved (BDT) | 913.5 (964.1) |
| % Reported reduced labor costs related to priming | 90.0 (30.2) |
| Actual value of saved labor costs (BDT) | 457.2 (809.3) |
Source: Survey, 2015.
Fig. 3Suggestions for improving the AFP.
Expected price offered by the sampled users' based on the length (feet) and diameter (inches) of the pump they were supplied under the demonstration program.
| Price range (BDT) | No. of farmers expressed willingness to purchase | Pump specification (length in feet/discharge diameter in inches) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14′ | 16′ | 18′ | 20′ | ||||||||||
| 4″ | 5″ | 6″ | 4″ | 5″ | 6″ | 4″ | 5″ | 6″ | 4″ | 5″ | 6″ | ||
| 0 | 15 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | |||||||
| 9700–11000 | 14 | 5 | 9 | ||||||||||
| 11500–12000 | 12 | 1 | 11 | ||||||||||
| 12500–12700 | 16 | 2 | 15 | ||||||||||
| >12700 | 13 | 13 | |||||||||||
| Expected price: BDT 9672.86 | 70 | 1 | 6 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 19 | 17 | |||||
Source: survey, 2015.
Function estimated applying a two-part model estimation approach explaining the factors that affect the probability of purchase and the price offered for an axial flow pump by an irrigation service provider in Bangladesh.
| Estimation procedures | Probit | GLM | dy/dx |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dependent variables | Will purchase an AFP (yes = 1) | Price of the pump | Marginal effects (overall) |
| Age, service provider | 0.033 | −0.001 | 69.41 |
| (0.02) | (0.00) | (54.80) | |
| Dummy for 5 or more years of schooling (yes = 1) | 0.96* | −0.0022 | 2229.20* |
| (0.58) | (0.01) | (1360.34) | |
| Years of schooling, spouse | −0.085 | 0.0011 | −193.14 |
| (0.06) | (0.00) | (142.59) | |
| Dummy for agriculture is the major occupation (yes = 1) | 1.55*** | 0.024 | 3866.18*** |
| (0.55) | (0.02) | (1101.88) | |
| No. of earners in the family | −0.59** | −0.0046 | −1423.08*** |
| (0.23) | (0.01) | (518.15) | |
| Provided irrigation services to the total land in 2014-15 season (ha) | 0.10* | 0.0012 | 247.56* |
| (0.06) | (0.00) | (131.28) | |
| Dummy for attaching a two-wheeled tractor to run AFP (yes = 1) | 1.91** | 0.015 | 4621.94** |
| (0.79) | (0.01) | (1839.75) | |
| Dummy for provided irrigation only to | 0.57 | −0.022 | 1122.38 |
| (0.60) | (0.02) | (1489.48) | |
| Land owned by the irrigation service provider (ha) | −0.002 | 0.0016*** | 11.26 |
| (0.04) | (0.00) | (98.09) | |
| Pump's discharge diameter (inches) | −0.71** | 0.18*** | 77.04 |
| (0.31) | (0.01) | (865.49) | |
| Pump's length (feet) | −0.10 | 0.043*** | 174.08 |
| (0.11) | (0.00) | (271.04) | |
| Bhola District dummy (yes = 1) | 0.90** | −0.0047 | 2076.02** |
| (0.41) | (0.01) | (1006.47) | |
| Constant | 4.41 | 7.68*** | |
| (3.05) | (0.08) | ||
| Observations | 70 | 55 | |
| Linktest | Pass | Pass | |
| Wald chi2 (11) | 25.64 | ||
| Prob > chi2 | 0.01 | ||
| Pseudo R2 | 0.34 | ||
| Log pseudolikelihood | −23.96 | −572.57 | |
| Deviance | .070 | ||
| Pearson | .070 | S | |
| AIC | 21.29 | ||
| BIC | −168.24 | ||
| Expected price that a service provider is willing to pay (BDT) for an AFP | 9649.84*** (485.44) |
Note: Values in parentheses are robust standard errors.*Significant at the 10% level; ** significant at the 5% level and ***significant at the 1% level.