Literature DB >> 30579711

The Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool Is Less Accurate in Extended Length of Stay Patients Following Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Zlatan Cizmic1, James E Feng2, Afshin A Anoushiravani3, Robert W Borzio2, Ran Schwarzkopf2, James D Slover2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although preoperative risk assessment tools have been effective in predicting discharge disposition after total joint arthroplasty (TJA), studies reporting on discharge planning in extended length of stay (ELOS), >3 days, patients are lacking. The purpose of this study was to describe the predictive utility of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT) for discharge disposition in ELOS patients.
METHODS: Our study included 260 patients with LOS >3 days who underwent primary TJA between 2014 and 2016. Patients were separated into 3 cohorts, based on their RAPT score: low risk (9-12), medium risk (6-9), and high risk for discharge to a facility (1-6). Scores were compared among cohorts and correlated with discharge disposition for patients who stayed beyond 3 days.
RESULTS: In ELOS, RAPT had a higher utility in predicting discharge disposition in the low-risk (76.5% to home) and high-risk (62.9% to facility) patient cohorts, while medium-risk patients (56.5% to home) were the least accurate. Responses that significantly correlated with discharge home included male gender (odds ratio [OR], 1.81; P < .05), ambulation without walking aids (OR, 2.94; P < .01) or a single-point cane (OR, 2.95; P < .0001), <1 community support visit per week preoperatively (OR, 1.86; P < .05), and having support from someone at home (OR, 3.43; P < .0001).
CONCLUSION: The RAPT score in ELOS patients is better correlated with the low-risk and high-risk cohorts than in medium-risk patients. Conversely, medium-risk ELOS patients constituted 56.8% of our sample size, but only predicted 56.5% of discharge dispositions correctly. Future discharge disposition risk assessment tools are needed to stratify medium-risk patients.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RAPT; discharge planning; length of stay; total hip arthroplasty; total joint arthroplasty; total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30579711     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  3 in total

1.  Modifying the RAPT Score to Reflect Discharge Destination in Current Practice.

Authors:  Eric Cohen; Daniel B C Reid; Matthew Quinn; Devin Walsh; Jeremy Raducha; Leigh Hubbard; John Froehlich
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-12-21

2.  Predictive Value of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT) Score for Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Patients: A Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Awf A Alshahwani; Maurice Dungey; Christopher Lillie; Steve Krikler; Christos Plakogiannis
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-03-25

3.  Clinical Study on the Screening of Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis by D-Dimer Combined with RAPT Score Among Orthopedic Trauma Patients.

Authors:  Xin Zhao; Salma Juma Ali; Xiguang Sang
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 1.251

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.