| Literature DB >> 30578754 |
Vesna Degoricija1, Ines Potočnjak2, Michaela Gastrager3, Gudrun Pregartner4, Andrea Berghold4, Hubert Scharnagl5, Tatjana Stojakovic5, Beate Tiran5, Gunther Marsche6, Saša Frank7.
Abstract
The link between HDL subclasses and the prognosis of cardiovascular diseases remains controversial. We thus evaluated the prognostic value of the HDL subclasses 3 and 2 cholesterol (HDL3-C, HDL2-C) as well as of total HDL-C for 3-month mortality in acute heart failure (AHF) patients. The serum levels of HDL3-C and total HDL-C were determined by detergent-based homogeneous assay. HDL2-C was computed by the difference between total HDL-C and HDL3-C. Out of the 132 analyzed patients, 35 (26.5%) died within three months after onset of AHF. Univariate logistic regression analyses revealed a significant inverse association of HDL3-C (odds ratio (OR) 0.46 per 1-SD increase, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27-0.72, p = 0.001) with 3-month mortality, whereas concentrations of total HDL-C and HDL2-C showed no significant association. After adjustment for various laboratory and clinical parameters known to be associated with mortality in heart failure patients, HDL3-C concentrations remained significantly associated with 3-month mortality (OR 0.34 per 1-SD increase, 95% CI 0.15-0.74, p =0.010). We conclude that low admission serum levels of HDL3-C are associated with an increased 3-month mortality in AHF patients, whereas total HDL-C and HDL2-C showed no association. HDL3-C might thus be useful as a prognostic parameter in AHF.Entities:
Keywords: HDL particles; HDL3 cholesterol; Homogeneous assays; Outcome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30578754 PMCID: PMC6591134 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.12.020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Chim Acta ISSN: 0009-8981 Impact factor: 3.786
Correlation analyses of HDL3-C, HDL2-C, and total HDL-C with clinical and laboratory parameters.
| HDL3-C (mmol/L) | HDL2-C (mmol/L) | Total HDL-C (mmol/L) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | p-Value | r | p-Value | r | p-Value | n | |
| Age (years) | –0.12 | 0.166 | 0.11 | 0.189 | 0.02 | 0.843 | 132 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.03 | 0.728 | –0.24 | 0.005 | –0.15 | 0.091 | 132 |
| MAP (mm Hg) | 0.44 | < | 0.25 | 0.003 | 0.33 | < | 132 |
| SPAP (mm Hg) | –0.36 | –0.13 | 0.282 | –0.21 | 0.063 | 76 | |
| Heart rate (beats/min) | 0.22 | 0.011 | 0.15 | 0.082 | 0.18 | 0.036 | 132 |
| NT-proBNP (pg/ml) | –0.28 | –0.03 | 0.781 | –0.13 | 0.162 | 126 | |
| GFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) | 0.23 | 0.007 | 0.13 | 0.137 | 0.19 | 0.029 | 131 |
| Urea (mmol/L) | –0.31 | < | –0.21 | 0.014 | –0.27 | 131 | |
| Creatinine ( | –0.25 | 0.004 | –0.24 | 0.005 | –0.27 | 131 | |
| ALT (U/L) | 0.07 | 0.443 | 0.03 | 0.719 | 0.03 | 0.772 | 128 |
| AST (U/L) | –0.08 | 0.386 | 0.08 | 0.351 | 0.03 | 0.760 | 129 |
| Protein (g/L) | 0.26 | 0.003 | 0.05 | 0.556 | 0.13 | 0.146 | 129 |
| Fibrinogen (g/L) | 0.20 | 0.021 | –0.01 | 0.873 | 0.08 | 0.394 | 127 |
| Albumin (g/L) | 0.17 | 0.058 | –0.01 | 0.902 | 0.04 | 0.679 | 129 |
| IL-6 (pg/mL) | –0.21 | 0.016 | –0.04 | 0.617 | –0.09 | 0.312 | 132 |
| CRP (μg/mL) | –0.31 | < | –0.22 | 0.011 | –0.27 | 130 | |
| Leukocytes (×109/L) | 0.22 | 0.010 | 0.10 | 0.278 | 0.16 | 0.074 | 131 |
| Platelets (×1012/L) | 0.32 | < | 0.16 | 0.072 | 0.24 | 0.006 | 132 |
Data presented are the Spearman correlation coefficient r, the corresponding p-values, and the number of available samples (n);
P-values of < 0.003 are considered significant after a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparison and are depicted in bold.
ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; CRP, C-reactive protein; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; IL-6, interleukin 6; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MAP, mean arterial pressure; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide; SPAP, systolic pulmonary artery pressure.
Fig. 1Correlation of HDL3-C, HDL2-C, and total HDL-C concentrations with small, large, and total HDL-P. Correlations of HDL3-C, HDL2-C, and total HDL-C with small, large, and total HDL-P were determined using the Spearman correlation coefficient. HDL-P, concentrations of HDL particles.
HDL3-C, HDL2-C, and total HDL-C levels in various groups of AHF patients.
| HDL3-C (mmol/L) | HDL2-C (mmol/L) | Total HDL-C (mmol/L) | n | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Male | 0.48 (0.23–0.85) | 0.59 (0.19–1.30) | 1.04 (0.42–1.83) | 67 |
| Female | 0.50 (0.27–0.82) | 0.69 (0.30–1.67) | 1.19 (0.57–2.46) | 65 | |
| p =0.733 | p =0.024 | p =0.095 | |||
| AHF type | De novo | 0.54 (0.32–0.85) | 0.64 (0.33–1.48) | 1.24 (0.70–2.30) | 40 |
| Worsening of CHF | 0.46 (0.23–0.79) | 0.61 (0.19–1.67) | 1.05 (0.42–2.46) | 92 | |
| p | p =0.115 | p =0.017 | |||
| Sign(s) | No | 0.57 (0.33–0.85) | 0.62 (0.33–1.25) | 1.22 (0.75–2.03) | 28 |
| Yes | 0.46 (0.23–0.82) | 0.62 (0.19–1.67) | 1.09 (0.42–2.46) | 104 | |
| p =0.555 | p =0.089 | ||||
| T2D | No | 0.51 (0.23–0.82) | 0.70 (0.35–1.67) | 1.22 (0.63–2.46) | 60 |
| Yes | 0.47 (0.23–0.85) | 0.59 (0.19–1.09) | 1.03 (0.42–1.59) | 71 | |
| p =0.210 | p | p | |||
| HypChol | No | 0.46 (0.23–0.69) | 0.62 (0.19–1.44) | 1.09 (0.42–1.94) | 81 |
| Yes | 0.53 (0.23–0.85) | 0.61 (0.30–1.67) | 1.21 (0.57–2.46) | 51 | |
| p | p =0.516 | p =0.070 | |||
| Three months after onset of AHF | Alive | 0.51 (0.26–0.85) | 0.62 (0.20–1.48) | 1.17 (0.46–2.30) | 92 |
| Dead | 0.41 (0.23–0.79) | 0.55 (0.19–1.67) | 0.99 (0.42–2.46) | 35 | |
| p | p =0.215 | p =0.023 |
Data are presented as median and range (minimum to maximum). Differences in the serum levels of HDL3-C, HDL2-C, and HDL-C between the groups were tested with the Mann-Whitney U test.
P-values of < 0.008 are considered significant after a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparison and are depicted in bold.
AHF, acute heart failure; CHF, chronic heart failure; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HypChol, hypercholesterolemia; Signs include enlarged liver, peripheral edemas, ascites and jugular venous distension.
Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses of 3-month mortality for HDL3-C, HDL2-C, and total HDL-C.
| Unadjusted | Adjusted[ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | p-value | OR (95% CI) | p-value | ||
| HDL3-C (mmol/L) | 0.46 (0.27–0.72) | 0.34 (0.15–0.74) | |||
| HDL2-C (mmol/L) | 0.89 (0.57–1.33) | 0.528 | 0.72 (0.39–1.30) | 0.283 | |
| Total HDL-C (mmol/L) | 0.70 (0.44–1.05) | 0.099 | 0.59 (0.30–1.09) | 0.101 | |
OR and CI are presented on the SD scale (increase per 1 SD); SDs for HDL3-C, HDL2-C, and total HDL-C are 0.13, 0.26, and 0.36 mmol/L, respectively.
Data of 127 patients (35 events) were available for the unadjusted analyses and data of 118 patients (33 events) for the adjusted analyses.
Significant results are depicted in bold.
CI, confidence interval; CRP, C-reactive protein; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MAP, mean arterial pressure; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide; OR, odds ratio; SD, standard deviation; T2D, type 2 diabetes.
The model was adjusted for age, sex, NT-proBNP, GFR, MAP, LDL-cholesterol, log(triglycerides), T2D, and CRP.