Ying Zhi Gu1, Deborah L Nisbet1,2, Karen L Reidy1,3, Ricardo Palma-Dias1,4. 1. Pauline Gandel Imaging Centre, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Australia. 2. Department of Medicine and Radiology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia. 3. Pregnancy Research Centre, Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Australia. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the frequency of abnormal genetic diagnoses spanning a period before and after the availability of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). We hypothesised that microarray would provide additional clinically relevant information in cases of isolated hypoplastic nasal bone. METHOD: Fetuses with ultrasound-detected hypoplastic nasal bone (absent or <2.5th percentile in length) between 16 and 37 weeks' gestation over a 10-year period were analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 118 cases of hypoplastic nasal bone met the inclusion criteria. A pathogenic or potentially pathogenic karyotype was detected more frequently in the era where CMA was available (31/60, 52% vs 19/58, 33%). Of these, 25 cases (42%) had common aneuploidies, and six cases (10%) had clinically relevant copy number variants (CNVs). A clinically relevant CNV was detected in two fetuses that presented with isolated hypoplastic nasal bone on initial ultrasound. CONCLUSION: In addition to its known association with trisomy 21, a hypoplastic nasal bone may be an objective marker of facial dysmorphism associated with clinically relevant CNVs. Our results support consideration of invasive testing with microarray for pregnancies in which a hypoplastic nasal bone has been diagnosed on ultrasound irrespective of a low-risk screening result for common chromosomal abnormalities.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the frequency of abnormal genetic diagnoses spanning a period before and after the availability of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). We hypothesised that microarray would provide additional clinically relevant information in cases of isolated hypoplastic nasal bone. METHOD: Fetuses with ultrasound-detected hypoplastic nasal bone (absent or <2.5th percentile in length) between 16 and 37 weeks' gestation over a 10-year period were analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 118 cases of hypoplastic nasal bone met the inclusion criteria. A pathogenic or potentially pathogenic karyotype was detected more frequently in the era where CMA was available (31/60, 52% vs 19/58, 33%). Of these, 25 cases (42%) had common aneuploidies, and six cases (10%) had clinically relevant copy number variants (CNVs). A clinically relevant CNV was detected in two fetuses that presented with isolated hypoplastic nasal bone on initial ultrasound. CONCLUSION: In addition to its known association with trisomy 21, a hypoplastic nasal bone may be an objective marker of facial dysmorphism associated with clinically relevant CNVs. Our results support consideration of invasive testing with microarray for pregnancies in which a hypoplastic nasal bone has been diagnosed on ultrasound irrespective of a low-risk screening result for common chromosomal abnormalities.
Authors: Hanna Moczulska; Marcin Serafin; Katarzyna Wojda; Maciej Borowiec; Piotr Sieroszewski Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-03-10 Impact factor: 4.241