Yougun Won1, Gi-Soo Lee2, Jung-Mo Hwang3, Il-Young Park3, Jae-Hwang Song1, Chan Kang3, Deuk-Soo Hwang3. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Korea; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Konyang University College of Medicine, Korea. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Korea. Electronic address: gs1899@hanmail.net. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bosworth described an unusual fracture-dislocation of the ankle with fixed posterior fracture-dislocation of the fibula. Previous epidemiological data on the prevalence and characteristics of patients with Bosworth ankle fractures have been limited. Bosworth fracture-dislocations are often missed in patients with ankle fractures. We investigated the outcomes of missed diagnosis and the prevalence of Bosworth fracture-dislocation in patients with ankle fractures. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of inpatients aged 15 years and older with an ankle fracture, who underwent surgery between 2007 and 2016 in 4 Korean hospitals. The patient demographics, risk factors, fracture characteristics, treatment data, outcomes, and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: We reviewed 3405 hospital admissions for ankle fractures. During the study period, Bosworth fracture-dislocations were diagnosed in 51 cases. The prevalence of Bosworth fracture-dislocations (n=51) was 1.62% among patients with ankle fractures who were enrolled in this study (n=3140). Emergency surgery was performed within 24h of injury in 36 cases (group A) and delayed surgery was performed in 15 cases (group B). The mean patient age at admission was 35.97 (standard deviation [SD], 1.643) years in group A and 34.33 (SD, 2.296) years in group B. Men were more commonly affected than women, with a 32:19 ratio. Most of the patients with Bosworth fracture-dislocations were young adults with high-energy trauma. The most frequent mechanism of trauma was falling down stairs (n=27, 52.94%), followed by traffic accidents. Patient outcomes were significantly better in group A than in group B. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of Bosworth fracture-dislocations was higher than expected. If unrecognized, it can result in inappropriate treatment and permanent disability. With accurate diagnosis and prompt treatment, excellent results can usually be obtained. LEVEL OF CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: 4.
BACKGROUND: Bosworth described an unusual fracture-dislocation of the ankle with fixed posterior fracture-dislocation of the fibula. Previous epidemiological data on the prevalence and characteristics of patients with Bosworth ankle fractures have been limited. Bosworth fracture-dislocations are often missed in patients with ankle fractures. We investigated the outcomes of missed diagnosis and the prevalence of Bosworth fracture-dislocation in patients with ankle fractures. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of inpatients aged 15 years and older with an ankle fracture, who underwent surgery between 2007 and 2016 in 4 Korean hospitals. The patient demographics, risk factors, fracture characteristics, treatment data, outcomes, and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: We reviewed 3405 hospital admissions for ankle fractures. During the study period, Bosworth fracture-dislocations were diagnosed in 51 cases. The prevalence of Bosworth fracture-dislocations (n=51) was 1.62% among patients with ankle fractures who were enrolled in this study (n=3140). Emergency surgery was performed within 24h of injury in 36 cases (group A) and delayed surgery was performed in 15 cases (group B). The mean patient age at admission was 35.97 (standard deviation [SD], 1.643) years in group A and 34.33 (SD, 2.296) years in group B. Men were more commonly affected than women, with a 32:19 ratio. Most of the patients with Bosworth fracture-dislocations were young adults with high-energy trauma. The most frequent mechanism of trauma was falling down stairs (n=27, 52.94%), followed by traffic accidents. Patient outcomes were significantly better in group A than in group B. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of Bosworth fracture-dislocations was higher than expected. If unrecognized, it can result in inappropriate treatment and permanent disability. With accurate diagnosis and prompt treatment, excellent results can usually be obtained. LEVEL OF CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: 4.