| Literature DB >> 30577650 |
Rohan Edmonds1, Meaghan Wood2,3, Patricia Fehling4, Sarah DiPasquale5.
Abstract
Heart rate (HR) variability (HRV) is a useful tool for assessing cardiac autonomic function and identifying potential readiness to perform in athletic populations, but has yet to be investigated in dance populations. As such, HRV may be able to provide valuable insight into the preparedness of dancers and the demands of performance in a collegiate dance population. 29 female dancers were monitored leading up to and following a dance performance. Analysis of HRV focused on the square root of the mean squared differences of the successive RR intervals (RMSSD). A one-way ANOVA, with Bonferroni post-hoc, paired with magnitude-based-inferences (MBI) with effect sizes (ES) were used to analyze changes during the Winter Dance Concert, while the Recovery-Stress Questionnaire for Athletes (REST-Q Sport) measured the frequency of stress of dancers. When compared to baseline (69.8 ± 1.7 bpm), mean (HR) was increased at both pre-show recordings (76.5 ± 2.1 bpm and 75.6 ± 1.8 bpm). In contrast, RMSSD was significantly diminished (p < 0.05) at both pre-show recordings (40.6 ± 28.4 ms and 40.5 ± 21.8 ms) as compared to baseline (70.3 ± 38.4 ms). Dancers reported increased (p < 0.05) self-efficacy before the second show and at 36 h post-concert. As expected, Dance Exposure (DE) increased significantly (p < 0.05), while Academic Exposure (AE) was similar, during the week leading up to the dance concert. The results suggest dancers responded to concert dance performances similarly to other athletic populations approaching intense competition by exhibiting decreased parasympathetic activity prior to the dance performances, which returned to baseline values 36 h after their performances. Given the increase in self-efficacy, these fluctuations may indicate a readiness to a performance comparable to athletes.Entities:
Keywords: ballet performance; cardiac autonomic function; dance preparedness; modern performance
Year: 2018 PMID: 30577650 PMCID: PMC6359634 DOI: 10.3390/sports7010003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sports (Basel) ISSN: 2075-4663
Figure 1A timeline of heart rate (HR) data collections (N = 29).
Figure 2Mean ± SD heart rate of dancers at baseline, during performance week, and after performance. Positive %SWC—the smallest positive worthwhile change for group heart rate. Negative %SWC—the smallest negative worthwhile change for group heart rate. a—Likely higher than baseline, p < 0.05 compared to baseline.
Mean values + SD, variance from baseline, effect size (ES), and qualitative inferences for HRV.
| Heart Rate Variability | Baseline | Dress Rehearsal | First Concert | Second Concert | 36 h Post-Concert |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean HR (bpm) | 69.3 ± 9.4 | 71.1 ± 11.0 | 75.8 ± 11.6 * | 75.1 ± 10.1 * | 72.1 ± 8.0 |
| %Δ (95% CI) | - | 2.3 (−2.9, 7.9) | 8.9 (3.2, 14.9) | 8.3 (3.9, 13.0) | 4.4 (−0.5, 9.4) |
| ES | - | 0.09 | 0.35 | 0.33 | 0.18 |
| QI | - | Trivial | Likely Positive | Likely Positive | Trivial |
| RMSSD (ms) | 70.3 ± 38.4 | 71.3 ± 43.1 | 40.6 ± 28.4 * | 40.5±21.8 * | 62.5 ± 30.2 |
| %Δ (95% CI) | - | −2.4 (−18.4, 16.9) | −44.5 (−56.2, −29.6) | −43.0 (−54.1, −29.3) | −16.1 (−30.1, 1.1) |
| ES | - | −0.02 | −0.61 | −0.58 | −0.18 |
| QI | - | Trivial | Most Likely Negative | Most Likely Negative | Trivial |
HR—heart rate; bpm—beats per minute; %Δ—percentage change from baseline; CI—confidence interval; ES—effect size; QI—qualitative inference; RMSSD—square root of the mean squared differences of the successive RR intervals. * p < 0.05 compared to baseline.
Figure 3Mean ± SD square root of the mean squared differences of the successive RR intervals (RMSSD) of dancers at baseline, pre-concert, and post-concert. Positive %SWC—the smallest positive worthwhile change for group RMSSD. Negative %SWC—the smallest negative worthwhile change for group RMSSD. a—Most likely lower than baseline, p < 0.05 compared to baseline. b—p < 0.05 compared to the second show
Figure 4Mean ± SD of general stress (A), general well-being (B), self-efficacy (C), and fatigue (D) of dancers at baseline, dress rehearsal, before the first and second show, and 36 h post-show (N = 29), < 0.05 vs. second show. b p < 0.05 vs. 36 h post-show.