Izak Faiena1, Amirali Salmasi1, Neil Mendhiratta1, Daniela Markovic2, Preeti Ahuja3, William Hsu3, David A Elashoff2, Steven S Raman1,3, Robert E Reiter1,4. 1. Institute of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California. 2. Department of Medicine Statistics Core, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California. 3. Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California. 4. Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Three Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging with PI-RADS™ (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System) version 2 scoring is a common tool in prostate cancer diagnosis which informs the likelihood of a cancerous lesion. We investigated whether PI-RADS version 2 also predicts adverse pathology features mainly in patients with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 4 disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 326 consecutive men with a preoperative template and/or magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion biopsy Gleason score of 6-7 from a prospectively maintained database of men who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy. The primary analysis was done in patients with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 4 to assess the primary outcome of adverse pathology features on univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The secondary outcome was biochemical recurrence-free survival using the Kaplan-Meier method. Similar analysis was done in patients with a biopsy Gleason score of 6-7. RESULTS: Of men with Gleason score 3 + 4 findings 27%, 15%, 36% and 23% showed a PI-RADS version 2 score of 0-2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively. On univariate analysis PI-RADS version 2 category 5 predicted adverse pathology features vs categories 0-2 (OR 10.7, 95% CI 3.7-31, p ≤0.001). On multivariate analysis the PI-RADS version 2 category 5 was associated with adverse pathology when adjusting for preoperative magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy (OR 11.4, 95% CI 3.7-35, p ≤0.0001). In men with a targeted biopsy Gleason score of 3 + 4 prostate cancer PI-RADS version 2 category 5 was associated with adverse pathology (OR 14.7, 95% CI 1.5-146.9, p = 0.02). Of men with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 4 disease 92% and 58% with a PI-RADS version 2 score of 4 and 5, respectively, had 2-year biochemical recurrence-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: A PI-RADS version 2 category 5 lesion in patients with a biopsy Gleason score 3 + 4 lesion predicted adverse pathology features and biochemical recurrence-free survival. These findings suggest that preoperative 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging may serve as a prognostic marker of treatment outcomes independently of biopsy Gleason score or biopsy type.
PURPOSE: Three Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging with PI-RADS™ (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System) version 2 scoring is a common tool in prostate cancer diagnosis which informs the likelihood of a cancerous lesion. We investigated whether PI-RADS version 2 also predicts adverse pathology features mainly in patients with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 4 disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 326 consecutive men with a preoperative template and/or magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion biopsy Gleason score of 6-7 from a prospectively maintained database of men who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy. The primary analysis was done in patients with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 4 to assess the primary outcome of adverse pathology features on univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The secondary outcome was biochemical recurrence-free survival using the Kaplan-Meier method. Similar analysis was done in patients with a biopsy Gleason score of 6-7. RESULTS: Of men with Gleason score 3 + 4 findings 27%, 15%, 36% and 23% showed a PI-RADS version 2 score of 0-2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively. On univariate analysis PI-RADS version 2 category 5 predicted adverse pathology features vs categories 0-2 (OR 10.7, 95% CI 3.7-31, p ≤0.001). On multivariate analysis the PI-RADS version 2 category 5 was associated with adverse pathology when adjusting for preoperative magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy (OR 11.4, 95% CI 3.7-35, p ≤0.0001). In men with a targeted biopsy Gleason score of 3 + 4 prostate cancer PI-RADS version 2 category 5 was associated with adverse pathology (OR 14.7, 95% CI 1.5-146.9, p = 0.02). Of men with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 4 disease 92% and 58% with a PI-RADS version 2 score of 4 and 5, respectively, had 2-year biochemical recurrence-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: A PI-RADS version 2 category 5 lesion in patients with a biopsy Gleason score 3 + 4 lesion predicted adverse pathology features and biochemical recurrence-free survival. These findings suggest that preoperative 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging may serve as a prognostic marker of treatment outcomes independently of biopsy Gleason score or biopsy type.