Literature DB >> 30577197

Adherence of Renal Transplant Recipients to Once-daily, Prolonged-Release and Twice-daily, Immediate-release Tacrolimus-based Regimens in a Real-life Setting in Sweden.

B Fellström1, J Holmdahl2, N Sundvall3, E Cockburn4, S Kilany4, L Wennberg5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this study we investigated medication adherence of kidney transplant patients (KTPs) to an immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-T) regimen and, after conversion, to a prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-T) regimen in routine clinical practice.
METHODS: This was a non-interventional, observational, multicenter Swedish study. We included adult KTPs with stable graft function, remaining on IR-T or converting from IR-T to PR-T. Data were collected at baseline, and months 3, 6, and 12 post-baseline. The primary endpoint was adherence using the Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medication Scale (BAASIS©). Secondary assessments included tacrolimus dose and trough levels, clinical laboratory parameters (eg, estimated glomerular filtration rate), and adverse drug reactions (ADRs).
RESULTS: Overall, data from 233 KTPs were analyzed (PR-T, n = 175; IR-T, n = 58). Mean change in PR-T dose from baseline (4.8 mg/d) to month 12 was -0.2 mg/d, and for IR-T (4.2 mg/d) was -0.4 mg/d; tacrolimus trough levels remained similar. Overall adherence was similar between baseline and month 12 in both groups (PR-T: 54.4% vs 57.0%, respectively; IR-T: 65.5% vs 69.4%); timing adherence followed a similar pattern. The probability of taking adherence improved between baseline and month 12 (odds ratio, 1.97; P = .0092) in the PR-T group only. Mean BAASIS visual analog scale score at baseline was 94.3 ± 11.1% (PR-T) and 95.3 ± 7.6% (IR-T), and >95% at subsequent visits. Laboratory parameters remained stable. Eight (4.6%) patients receiving PR-T (none receiving IR-T) had ADRs considered probably/possibly treatment-related.
CONCLUSION: Disparity existed between high, patient-perceived and low, actual adherence. Overall adherence to the immunosuppressive regimen (measured by BAASIS) did not improve significantly over 12 months in stable KTPs converting to PR-T or remaining on IR-T; renal function remained stable.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30577197     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.06.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  5 in total

Review 1.  Detecting, preventing and treating non-adherence to immunosuppression after kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Ilaria Gandolfini; Alessandra Palmisano; Enrico Fiaccadori; Paolo Cravedi; Umberto Maggiore
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2022-01-14

2.  A Comparative Analysis of Once-daily and Twice-daily Formulation of Tacrolimus in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Murat Ferhat Ferhatoglu; Abdulcabbar Kartal; Taner Kivilcim; Ali Ilker Filiz; Gursel Yildiz; Alp Gurkan
Journal:  Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul       Date:  2021-03-17

3.  Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus-Based Maintenance Regimens in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Manjunatha T A; Rebecca Chng; Wai-Ping Yau
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 1.530

4.  Prevalence and Risk Factors of Immunosuppressant Nonadherence in Heart Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Min Zhang; Hong Zhou; Ryan S Nelson; Yong Han; Yirong Wang; Hongping Xiang; Jie Cai; Jing Zhang; Yonghua Yuan
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 2.711

5.  Retrospective Analysis of Tacrolimus Intrapatient Variability as a Measure of Medication Adherence.

Authors:  Jordana Herblum; Niki Dacouris; Michael Huang; Jeffrey Zaltzman; G V Ramesh Prasad; Michelle Nash; Lucy Chen
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2021-06-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.