K-L Liu1, C-H Chien2, C-Y Hsieh3, X-Y Huang4, H-H Wang5, K-J Lin5, Y-J Chiang5. 1. Department of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan; Organ Transplantation Institute, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan. 2. College of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan. Electronic address: chinghui@ntunhs.edu.tw. 3. Department of Nursing, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan. 4. College of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan. 5. Department of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan; Organ Transplantation Institute, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While most living kidney donors are satisfied with their decision and do not regret donating, few studies have been conducted on the determinants related to the effectiveness and regret of the decision. This study aims to explore the relationship between basic attributes, quality of life, positive affect, negative affect, effectiveness of decision-making, and regret in living kidney donors. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, living kidney donors were recruited from urology and kidney transplant outpatient services. The structured questionnaire used to collect the data included the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey, Decision Conflict Scale, and Decision Regret Scale. RESULTS: The findings indicate that living donors with better health status, 24-hour creatinine clearance, physical health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and positive affect experienced greater feelings of effective decision-making. Moreover, women and donors with better physical HRQOL, positive affect, and decision effectiveness were less regretful about the decision of kidney donation. CONCLUSION: Health status, physical HRQOL, and positive affect are related to decision validity and regret of living donors. Therefore, clinical care providers should regularly assess the mood and health of living kidney donors. Furthermore, activities promoting their health should be encouraged, especially for men.
BACKGROUND: While most living kidney donors are satisfied with their decision and do not regret donating, few studies have been conducted on the determinants related to the effectiveness and regret of the decision. This study aims to explore the relationship between basic attributes, quality of life, positive affect, negative affect, effectiveness of decision-making, and regret in living kidney donors. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, living kidney donors were recruited from urology and kidney transplant outpatient services. The structured questionnaire used to collect the data included the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey, Decision Conflict Scale, and Decision Regret Scale. RESULTS: The findings indicate that living donors with better health status, 24-hour creatinine clearance, physical health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and positive affect experienced greater feelings of effective decision-making. Moreover, women and donors with better physical HRQOL, positive affect, and decision effectiveness were less regretful about the decision of kidney donation. CONCLUSION: Health status, physical HRQOL, and positive affect are related to decision validity and regret of living donors. Therefore, clinical care providers should regularly assess the mood and health of living kidney donors. Furthermore, activities promoting their health should be encouraged, especially for men.
Authors: Charleen I Theroux; Kylie N Hill; Anna L Olsavsky; James L Klosky; Nicholas D Yeager; Anthony Audino; Sarah H O'Brien; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Cynthia A Gerhardt; Leena Nahata Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 6.639