Literature DB >> 30577126

Cost-effective opportunities for climate change mitigation in Indian agriculture.

Tek B Sapkota1, Sylvia H Vetter2, M L Jat3, Smita Sirohi4, Paresh B Shirsath5, Rajbir Singh6, Hanuman S Jat7, Pete Smith2, Jon Hillier8, Clare M Stirling9.   

Abstract

Long-term changes in average temperatures, precipitation, and climate variability threaten agricultural production, food security, and the livelihoods of farming communities globally. Whilst adaptation to climate change is necessary to ensure food security and protect livelihoods of poor farmers, mitigation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions can lessen the extent of climate change and future needs for adaptation. Many agricultural practices can potentially mitigate GHG emissions without compromising food production. India is the third largest GHG emitter in the world where agriculture is responsible for 18% of total national emissions. India has identified agriculture as one of the priority sectors for GHG emission reduction in its Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). Identification of emission hotspots and cost-effective mitigation options in agriculture can inform the prioritisation of efforts to reduce emissions without compromising food and nutrition security. We adopted a bottom-up approach to analyse GHG emissions using large datasets of India's 'cost of cultivation survey' and the '19th livestock census' together with soil, climate and management data for each location. Mitigation measures and associated costs and benefits of adoption, derived from a variety of sources including the literature, stakeholder meetings and expert opinion, were presented in the form of Marginal Abatement Cost Curves (MACC). We estimated that by 2030, business-as-usual GHG emissions from the agricultural sector in India would be 515 Megatonne CO2 equivalent (MtCO2e) per year with a technical mitigation potential of 85.5 MtCO2e per year through adoption of various mitigation practices. About 80% of the technical mitigation potential could be achieved by adopting only cost-saving measures. Three mitigation options, i.e. efficient use of fertilizer, zero-tillage and rice-water management, could deliver more than 50% of the total technical abatement potential.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agriculture; Climate change; Greenhouse gas; India; Marginal Abatement Cost Curve; Mitigation

Year:  2018        PMID: 30577126     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  4 in total

1.  Crop nutrient management using Nutrient Expert improves yield, increases farmers' income and reduces greenhouse gas emissions.

Authors:  Tek B Sapkota; Mangi L Jat; Dharamvir S Rana; Arun Khatri-Chhetri; Hanuman S Jat; Deepak Bijarniya; Jhabar M Sutaliya; Manish Kumar; Love K Singh; Raj K Jat; Kailash Kalvaniya; Gokul Prasad; Harminder S Sidhu; Munmun Rai; T Satyanarayana; Kaushik Majumdar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Global externalities from avoided emissions in the Costa Rican cattle sector: opportunities for more efficient mitigation policies.

Authors:  Felipe Dall'Orsoletta; Andrei Domingues Cechin
Journal:  Discov Sustain       Date:  2021-08-11

3.  Digital artifacts reveal development and diffusion of climate research.

Authors:  Bia Carneiro; Giuliano Resce; Tek B Sapkota
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  India consists of multiple food systems with scoioeconomic and environmental variations.

Authors:  Tushar Ramchandra Athare; Prajal Pradhan; S R K Singh; Juergen P Kropp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.