Literature DB >> 30577062

Endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia (EGGIM): a multicenter validation study.

Gianluca Esposito1, Pedro Pimentel-Nunes2,3,4, Stefano Angeletti1, Rui Castro2, Diogo Libânio2,3, Gloria Galli1, Edith Lahner1, Emilio Di Giulio1, Bruno Annibale1, Mario Dinis-Ribeiro2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Random biopsies are recommended to identify individuals at risk of gastric adenocarcinoma. Cumulative evidence suggests that narrow-band imaging (NBI) can be used to grade gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM). We aimed to externally validate a classification of endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia (EGGIM).
METHODS: Consecutive patients in two centers were submitted to high resolution white-light gastroscopy followed by NBI to estimate EGGIM - a score (0 - 10) resulting from the sum of endoscopic assessments of GIM, scored as 0, 1, or 2 for no GIM, ≤ 30 %, or > 30 % of the mucosa, respectively, in five areas (lesser and greater curvature of both antrum and corpus, and incisura). If GIM was endoscopically suspected, targeted biopsies were performed; if GIM was not noticeable, random biopsies were performed according to the Sydney system to estimate the operative link on gastric intestinal metaplasia (OLGIM; the gold standard).
RESULTS: 250 patients (62 % female; median age 55 years) were included. GIM was staged as OLGIM 0, I, II, III, IV in 136 (54 %), 15 (6 %), 52 (21 %), 34 (14 %), and 13 (5 %) patients, respectively. All patients with GIM except three were identifiable with targeted biopsies. For the diagnosis of OLGIM III/IV, the area under the ROC curve was 0.96 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.93 - 0.98) and by using the cutoff > 4, sensitivity, specificity, and positive likelihood ratio were 89 %, 95 %, and 16.5, respectively; results were similar (91 %, 95 %, and 18.1) when excluding patients with foveolar hyperplasia.
CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, an endoscopic approach was externally validated to determine the risk of gastric cancer without the need for biopsies. This can be used to simplify and individualize the management of patients with gastric precancerous conditions. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30577062     DOI: 10.1055/a-0808-3186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  18 in total

1.  Diabetes mellitus is associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer: a cohort study.

Authors:  Hyo-Joon Yang; Danbee Kang; Yoosoo Chang; Jiin Ahn; Seungho Ryu; Juhee Cho; Eliseo Guallar; Chong Il Sohn
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Helicobacter pylori eradication improved the Kyoto classification score on endoscopy.

Authors:  Osamu Toyoshima; Toshihiro Nishizawa; Kosuke Sakitani; Tadahiro Yamakawa; Yoshiyuki Takahashi; Kazunori Kinoshita; Akira Torii; Atsuo Yamada; Hidekazu Suzuki; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  JGH Open       Date:  2020-05-29

3.  Ultra-magnifying narrow-band imaging for endoscopic diagnosis of gastric intestinal metaplasia: a pilot image analysis study.

Authors:  Hiroyoshi Iwagami; Noriya Uedo; Hon-Chi Yip; Satoki Shichijo; Takashi Kanesaka; Akira Maekawa; Sachiko Yamamoto; Koji Higashino; Yoji Takeuchi; Ryu Ishihara; Shin-Ichi Nakatsuka
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-03-17

4.  Gastric intestinal metaplasia: can we abandon random biopsies.

Authors:  Gianluca Esposito; Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-04-14

5.  Endoscopic diagnosis of gastric intestinal metaplasia in patients with autoimmune gastritis using narrow-band imaging: does pseudopyloric metaplasia muddy the waters?

Authors:  Emanuele Dilaghi; Gianluca Esposito; Giulia Pivetta; Gloria Galli; Emanuela Pilozzi; Bruno Annibale; Edith Lahner
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-04-14

6.  Accuracy of endoscopic staging and targeted biopsies for routine gastric intestinal metaplasia and gastric atrophy evaluation study protocol of a prospective, cohort study: the estimate study.

Authors:  Stella A V Nieuwenburg; William W Waddingham; David Graham; Manuel Rodriguez-Justo; Katharina Biermann; Ernst J Kuipers; Matthew Banks; Marnix Jansen; Manon C W Spaander
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Endoscopic Kyoto classification of Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric cancer risk diagnosis.

Authors:  Osamu Toyoshima; Toshihiro Nishizawa; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Previous Helicobacter pylori infection-induced atrophic gastritis: A distinct disease entity in an understudied population without a history of eradication.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kishikawa; Keisuke Ojiro; Kenji Nakamura; Tadashi Katayama; Kyoko Arahata; Sakiko Takarabe; Soichiro Miura; Takanori Kanai; Jiro Nishida
Journal:  Helicobacter       Date:  2019-11-03       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 9.  Recent advances in the detection and management of early gastric cancer and its precursors.

Authors:  William Waddingham; Stella A V Nieuwenburg; Sean Carlson; Manuel Rodriguez-Justo; Manon Spaander; Ernst J Kuipers; Marnix Jansen; David G Graham; Matthew Banks
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-07-30

10.  Where should gastric biopsies be performed when areas of intestinal metaplasia are observed?

Authors:  Marta Rodríguez-Carrasco; Diogo Libânio; Mário Dinis-Ribeiro; Pedro Pimentel-Nunes
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-11-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.