Literature DB >> 30576825

The n-HA/PA66 Cage Versus the PEEK Cage in Anterior Cervical Fusion with Single-Level Discectomy During 7 Years of Follow-Up.

Bowen Hu1, Xi Yang1, Yujie Hu1, Qiunan Lyu1, Limin Liu1, Ce Zhu1, Chunguang Zhou1, Yueming Song2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide66 (n-HA/PA66) cage is a novel biomimetic nonmetal cage, whereas the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage has been widely used for decades with excellent clinical outcomes. However, there has been no long-term comparison of these 2 cages in anterior cervical reconstruction.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 98 patients who underwent single-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) from January 2009 to June 2011 with at least 7 years of follow-up; the PEEK cage was used in 51 patients (PEEK group), whereas the n-HA/PA66 cage was used in 47 (n-HA/PA66 group). The groups were compared regarding radiographic (cage subsidence, fusion status, cervical lordosis, and segmental sagittal alignment) and clinical (10-point visual analog scale and Japanese Orthopedic Association scores) parameters preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the final follow-up.
RESULTS: The n-HA/PA66 and PEEK cages had similar fusion rates at the final follow-up (97.9% vs. 98.0%). The respective cage subsidence rates in the PEEK and n-HA/PA66 cage groups were 9.8% and 10.6%. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in mean cervical lordosis, mean interbody height, segmental sagittal alignment, cervical lordosis, and 10-point visual analog scale and Japanese Orthopedic Association scores at the final follow-up. The n-HA/PA66 cages resulted in high fusion and low subsidence rates during long-term follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: After single-level ACDF, the n-HA/PA66 cage showed similar radiographic fusion, subsidence rate, and clinical results compared with the PEEK cage during 7 years of follow-up. These results suggest that the n-HA/PA66 cage could be comparable with the PEEK cage for ACDF.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cage; Cervical spine; Discectomy; Fusion; Nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide66 cage; Polyetheretherketone cage

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30576825     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  5 in total

Review 1.  Hydroxyapatite Use in Spine Surgery-Molecular and Clinical Aspect.

Authors:  Jakub Litak; Wojciech Czyzewski; Michał Szymoniuk; Bartlomiej Pastuszak; Joanna Litak; Grzegorz Litak; Cezary Grochowski; Mansur Rahnama-Hezavah; Piotr Kamieniak
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.748

2.  Titanium-interlayer mediated hydroxyapatite coating on polyetheretherketone: a prospective study in patients with single-level cervical degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Ce Zhu; Miaomiao He; Lili Mao; Tao Li; Li Zhang; Limin Liu; Ganjun Feng; Yueming Song
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 5.531

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of a customized 3D-printed polyetheretherketone condylar prosthesis.

Authors:  Fang Guo; Shuo Huang; Min Hu; Chuncheng Yang; Dichen Li; Changkui Liu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Preliminary outcomes of allograft and hydroxyapatite as substitutes for autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with self-locking standalone cages.

Authors:  Changsheng Yang; Wentao Zhuo; Qingchu Li; Caiqiang Huang; Huibo Yan; Dadi Jin
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 5.  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Silicon Nitride and Biomaterial Modulus as it Relates to Subsidence Risk in Spinal Fusion Surgery.

Authors:  Jared D Ament; Amir Vokshoor; Randy Yee; J Patrick Johnson
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2022-09-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.