| Literature DB >> 30576488 |
Charles Tapley Hoyt1,2, Daniel Domingo-Fernández1,2, Martin Hofmann-Apitius1,2.
Abstract
The rapid accumulation of knowledge in the field of systems and networks biology during recent years requires complex, but user-friendly and accessible web applications that allow from visualization to complex algorithmic analysis. While several web applications exist with various focuses on creation, revision, curation, storage, integration, collaboration, exploration, visualization and analysis, many of these services remain disjoint and have yet to be packaged into a cohesive environment.Here, we present BEL Commons: an integrative knowledge discovery environment for networks encoded in the Biological Expression Language (BEL). Users can upload files in BEL to be parsed, validated, compiled and stored with fine granular permissions. After, users can summarize, explore and optionally shared their networks with the scientific community. We have implemented a query builder wizard to help users find the relevant portions of increasingly large and complex networks and a visualization interface that allows them to explore their resulting networks. Finally, we have included a dedicated analytical service for performing data-driven analysis of knowledge networks to support hypothesis generation.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30576488 PMCID: PMC6301338 DOI: 10.1093/database/bay126
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Database (Oxford) ISSN: 1758-0463 Impact factor: 3.451
Figure 1BEL Commons comprises several components: (i) the network uploader and validator, (ii) user rights and project management, (iii) the query builder, (iv) the biological network explorer and (iv) the analytical service.
Figure 2The statistical (A, left) and biogrammar (B, right) summary pages.
Figure 3The network catalog (A, left) and user activity page (B, right).
Statistics over a selection of the resources publicly initially available in BEL Commons. These numbers are accurate to the best of our ability, but may not reflect nominal values from their sources depending on the ability of PyBEL to parse their contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selventa Example Corpora ( | 5 | 16 339 | 36 971 | 5083 |
| Causal Biological Networks Database ( | 138 | 5343 | 28 766 | 4580 |
| NeuroMMSig ( | 8 | 1411 | 3221 | 201 |
Seed methods available in the query builder
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Nth neighbors | This induces a subnetwork over nodes in paths of length less than or equal to N from any query node, terminating at any node, including ones not included in the query. |
| Upstream subnetwork | This induces a subnetwork over nodes with causal edges targeting the query nodes then repeats a second time for that subnetwork in order to include a second layer. Finally, induces all causal edges between resulting nodes. |
| Downstream subnetwork | This induces a subnetwork over nodes with causal edges originating from the query nodes then repeats a second time for that subnetwork in order to include a second layer. Finally, induces all causal edges between resulting nodes. |
| Shortest paths | This induces a subnetwork over all nodes in the shortest paths between any pair of query nodes, implemented by NetworkX ( |
| All paths | This induces a subnetwork over all nodes in all of the paths (length less than seven) between any pair of query nodes, implemented by NetworkX ( |
| Provenance | This builds a subnetwork from all edges with provenance from articles with the given PubMed identifiers. |
| Authors | This builds a subnetwork from all edges from articles written by authors with the given names. |
| Annotations | This builds a subnetwork from all edges matching given biological or contextual annotations. |
Figure 4The biological network explorer and related navigation components. Truncated from this image are the node information and query information boxes.
Figure 5A parallel coordinate plot of the final heats from biological processes from several Alzheimer's disease-specific networks after running the heat diffusion workflow with differential gene expression data from Blalock et al. (56) comparing patients at three stages of Alzheimer's disease.