Importance: Recognizing the characteristics of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein autoantibody (MOG-IgG) myelitis is essential for early accurate diagnosis and treatment. Objective: To evaluate the clinical, radiologic, and prognostic features of MOG-IgG myelitis and compare with myelitis with aquaporin-4-IgG (AQP4-IgG) and multiple sclerosis (MS). Design, Setting, and Participants: We retrospectively identified 199 MOG-IgG-positive Mayo Clinic patients from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2017, through our neuroimmunology laboratory. Fifty-four patients met inclusion criteria of (1) clinical myelitis; (2) MOG-IgG positivity; and (3) medical records available. We excluded 145 patients without documented myelitis. Myelitis of AQP4-IgG (n = 46) and MS (n = 26) were used for comparison. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcome variables included modified Rankin score and need for gait aid. A neuroradiologist analyzed spine magnetic resonance imaging of patients with MOG-IgG and control patients blinded to diagnosis. Results: Of 54 included patients with MOG-IgG myelitis, the median age was 25 years (range, 3-73 years) and 24 were women (44%). Isolated transverse myelitis was the initial manifestation in 29 patients (54%), and 10 (19%) were initially diagnosed as having viral/postviral acute flaccid myelitis. Cerebrospinal fluid-elevated oligoclonal bands occurred in 1 of 38 (3%). At final follow-up (median, 24 months; range, 2-120 months), 32 patients (59%) had developed 1 or more relapses of optic neuritis (n = 31); transverse myelitis (n = 7); or acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (n = 1). Clinical features favoring MOG-IgG myelitis vs AQP4-IgG or MS myelitis included prodromal symptoms and concurrent acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Magnetic resonance imaging features favoring MOG-IgG over AQP4-IgG or MS myelitis were T2-signal abnormality confined to gray matter (sagittal line and axial H sign) and lack of enhancement. Longitudinally extensive T2 lesions were of similar frequency in MOG-IgG and AQP4-IgG myelitis (37 of 47 [79%] vs 28 of 34 [82%]; P = .52) but not found in MS. Multiple spinal cord lesions and conus involvement were more frequent with MOG-IgG than AQP4-IgG but not different from MS. Wheelchair dependence at myelitis nadir occurred in one-third of patients with MOG-IgG and AQP4-IgG but never with MS, although patients with MOG-IgG myelitis recovered better than those with AQP4-IgG. Conclusions and Relevance: Myelitis is an early manifestation of MOG-IgG-related disease and may have a clinical phenotype of acute flaccid myelitis. We identified a variety of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging features that may help clinicians identify those at risk in whom MOG-IgG should be tested.
Importance: Recognizing the characteristics of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein autoantibody (MOG-IgG) myelitis is essential for early accurate diagnosis and treatment. Objective: To evaluate the clinical, radiologic, and prognostic features of MOG-IgG myelitis and compare with myelitis with aquaporin-4-IgG (AQP4-IgG) and multiple sclerosis (MS). Design, Setting, and Participants: We retrospectively identified 199 MOG-IgG-positive Mayo Clinic patients from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2017, through our neuroimmunology laboratory. Fifty-four patients met inclusion criteria of (1) clinical myelitis; (2) MOG-IgG positivity; and (3) medical records available. We excluded 145 patients without documented myelitis. Myelitis of AQP4-IgG (n = 46) and MS (n = 26) were used for comparison. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcome variables included modified Rankin score and need for gait aid. A neuroradiologist analyzed spine magnetic resonance imaging of patients with MOG-IgG and control patients blinded to diagnosis. Results: Of 54 included patients with MOG-IgG myelitis, the median age was 25 years (range, 3-73 years) and 24 were women (44%). Isolated transverse myelitis was the initial manifestation in 29 patients (54%), and 10 (19%) were initially diagnosed as having viral/postviral acute flaccid myelitis. Cerebrospinal fluid-elevated oligoclonal bands occurred in 1 of 38 (3%). At final follow-up (median, 24 months; range, 2-120 months), 32 patients (59%) had developed 1 or more relapses of optic neuritis (n = 31); transverse myelitis (n = 7); or acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (n = 1). Clinical features favoring MOG-IgG myelitis vs AQP4-IgG or MS myelitis included prodromal symptoms and concurrent acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. Magnetic resonance imaging features favoring MOG-IgG over AQP4-IgG or MS myelitis were T2-signal abnormality confined to gray matter (sagittal line and axial H sign) and lack of enhancement. Longitudinally extensive T2 lesions were of similar frequency in MOG-IgG and AQP4-IgG myelitis (37 of 47 [79%] vs 28 of 34 [82%]; P = .52) but not found in MS. Multiple spinal cord lesions and conus involvement were more frequent with MOG-IgG than AQP4-IgG but not different from MS. Wheelchair dependence at myelitis nadir occurred in one-third of patients with MOG-IgG and AQP4-IgG but never with MS, although patients with MOG-IgG myelitis recovered better than those with AQP4-IgG. Conclusions and Relevance: Myelitis is an early manifestation of MOG-IgG-related disease and may have a clinical phenotype of acute flaccid myelitis. We identified a variety of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging features that may help clinicians identify those at risk in whom MOG-IgG should be tested.
Authors: Jan A Martin; Kevin Messacar; Michele L Yang; John A Maloney; Jennifer Lindwall; Terri Carry; Patricia Kenyon; Stefan H Sillau; Joyce Oleszek; Kenneth L Tyler; Samuel R Dominguez; Teri L Schreiner Journal: Neurology Date: 2017-06-14 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Maciej Jurynczyk; Ruth Geraldes; Fay Probert; Mark R Woodhall; Patrick Waters; George Tackley; Gabriele DeLuca; Saleel Chandratre; Maria I Leite; Angela Vincent; Jacqueline Palace Journal: Brain Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Eoin P Flanagan; Brian G Weinshenker; Karl N Krecke; Vanda A Lennon; Claudia F Lucchinetti; Andrew McKeon; Dean M Wingerchuk; Elizabeth A Shuster; Yujuan Jiao; Erika S Horta; Sean J Pittock Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Nicholas L Zalewski; Padraig P Morris; Brian G Weinshenker; Claudia F Lucchinetti; Yong Guo; Sean J Pittock; Karl N Krecke; Timothy J Kaufmann; Dean M Wingerchuk; Neeraj Kumar; Eoin P Flanagan Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2016-12-02 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Kevin Messacar; Teri L Schreiner; Keith Van Haren; Michele Yang; Carol A Glaser; Kenneth L Tyler; Samuel R Dominguez Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2016-08-04 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Eoin P Flanagan; Timothy J Kaufmann; Karl N Krecke; Allen J Aksamit; Sean J Pittock; B Mark Keegan; Caterina Giannini; Brian G Weinshenker Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2016-02-12 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Shin H Kang; Ying Li; Masahiro Fukaya; Ileana Lorenzini; Don W Cleveland; Lyle W Ostrow; Jeffrey D Rothstein; Dwight E Bergles Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2013-03-31 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Francesc Graus; Maarten J Titulaer; Ramani Balu; Susanne Benseler; Christian G Bien; Tania Cellucci; Irene Cortese; Russell C Dale; Jeffrey M Gelfand; Michael Geschwind; Carol A Glaser; Jerome Honnorat; Romana Höftberger; Takahiro Iizuka; Sarosh R Irani; Eric Lancaster; Frank Leypoldt; Harald Prüss; Alexander Rae-Grant; Markus Reindl; Myrna R Rosenfeld; Kevin Rostásy; Albert Saiz; Arun Venkatesan; Angela Vincent; Klaus-Peter Wandinger; Patrick Waters; Josep Dalmau Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2016-02-20 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Elia Sechi; Karl N Krecke; Sean J Pittock; Divyanshu Dubey; A Sebastian Lopez-Chiriboga; Amy Kunchok; Brian G Weinshenker; Nicholas L Zalewski; Eoin P Flanagan Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2020-02-27 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Olwen C Murphy; Kevin Messacar; Leslie Benson; Riley Bove; Jessica L Carpenter; Thomas Crawford; Janet Dean; Roberta DeBiasi; Jay Desai; Matthew J Elrick; Raquel Farias-Moeller; Grace Y Gombolay; Benjamin Greenberg; Matthew Harmelink; Sue Hong; Sarah E Hopkins; Joyce Oleszek; Catherine Otten; Cristina L Sadowsky; Teri L Schreiner; Kiran T Thakur; Keith Van Haren; Carolina M Carballo; Pin Fee Chong; Amary Fall; Vykuntaraju K Gowda; Jelte Helfferich; Ryutaro Kira; Ming Lim; Eduardo L Lopez; Elizabeth M Wells; E Ann Yeh; Carlos A Pardo Journal: Lancet Date: 2020-12-23 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: C A P F Alves; A Goldstein; S R Teixeira; J S Martin-Saavedra; I P de Barcelos; G Fadda; L Caschera; M Kidd; F G Gonçalves; E M McCormick; M J Falk; Z Zolkipli-Cunningham; A Vossough; G Zuccoli Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-12-31 Impact factor: 3.825