Literature DB >> 30575199

Relations between baseline burden, maximum duration, and relative reduction of atrial fibrillation: Insights from continuous monitoring in rhythm control.

Po-Lin Lin1, Chun-Che Huang2, Yih-Jer Wu3,4, Min-I Su5, Wei-Ru Chiou5, Lawrence Yu-Min Liu1, Feng-Ching Liao3, Edward Lai6, Chun-Yen Chen3, Jen-Yuan Kuo3, Ying-Hsiang Lee3,4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) can measure atrial fibrillation (AF) early; however, the timing for administering antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) to suppress AF remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between baseline values and changes after AAD in terms of relative reduction of AF burden (RRAB) and maximum AF duration (RRMD).
METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study screened all patients with nonpermanent AF who had dual-chamber pacemakers and only enrolled those receiving a naive AAD between September 2009 and December 2014. AF burden and maximum duration were calculated using CIED at 0 and 3 to 6 months after starting rhythm control. All the enrolled patients were divided into four groups according to baseline AF burden. RRAB and RRMD were monitored using CIEDs.
RESULTS: Overall, 145 eligible subjects received a naive AAD for nonpermanent AF. The mean RRAB in the four groups (AF burden <1%, 1%-4%, 4%-18%, and ≥18%) were -65.3%, -46.4%, -34.7%, and -27.9% (P = 0.005), respectively. Mean RRMD were -26.8%, -12.4%, 4.2%, and 6.0%, respectively ( P = 0.006). Multivariate analysis revealed that the lowest baseline AF burden (<1%) was significantly associated with greater RRAB, which was not observed in the RRMD model.
CONCLUSIONS: Lower baseline AF burden was associated with greater RRAB by AADs. Our finding suggests that rhythm control should be started in the early stage to achieve better responses to AADs.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antiarrhythmic drugs; atrial fibrillation; burden; cardiac implantable electronic device; rhythm control

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30575199     DOI: 10.1111/jce.13824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  3 in total

1.  Exploratory Evaluation of Rhythm Control by Dronedarone in Combination With Low-Dose Rivaroxaban, Warfarin, Antiplatelet, or None of the Antithrombotic Therapy in High-Risk Patients With Non-Permanent Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Po-Lin Lin; Wei-Ru Chiou; Min-I Su; Chun-Che Huang; Feng-Ching Liao; Lawrence Yu-Min Liu; Jen-Yu Chuang; Chun-Yen Chen; Cheng-Ting Tsai; Jen-Yuan Kuo; Ten-Fang Yang; Yih-Jer Wu; Ying-Hsiang Lee
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.389

2.  Rhythm control without catheter ablation may have benefits beyond stroke prevention in rivaroxaban-treated non-permanent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Wei-Ru Chiou; Po-Lin Lin; Chun-Che Huang; Jen-Yu Chuang; Lawrence Yu-Min Liu; Min-I Su; Feng-Ching Liao; Jen-Yuan Kuo; Cheng-Ting Tsai; Yih-Jer Wu; Kuang-Te Wang; Ying-Hsiang Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Safety and Effectiveness of Rivaroxaban in Combination with Various Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Patients with Non-Permanent Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Wei-Ru Chiou; Chun-Che Huang; Po-Lin Lin; Jen-Yu Chuang; Lawrence Yu-Min Liu; Min-I Su; Feng-Ching Liao; Chun-Yen Chen; Jen-Yuan Kuo; Cheng-Ting Tsai; Yih-Jer Wu; Ying-Hsiang Lee
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.571

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.