Literature DB >> 30574948

Response to comment on: Dramatic response to intravitreal bevacizumab in hypertensive retinopathy.

Srikant Padhi1, Vinod Kumar1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30574948      PMCID: PMC6324157          DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1740_18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0301-4738            Impact factor:   1.848


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, We would like to thank the authors for their interest in the article[1] and valuable comments.[2] Point wise response to the author's queries is as follows: We agree that the decrease in blood pressure could have attributed to the decrease in subfoveal fluid in the fellow eye. However, the decrease in the intraretinal and subfoveal fluid in both the eyes was noted at one-week post injection itself while patient was still under treatment for control of blood pressure. It is therefore unlikely that blood pressure could have attributed to the decrease in subfoveal fluid in the fellow eye. The patient did not undergo any interventions to control the BP including haemodialysis. We thank the authors for pointing out the typographical error. MAP is 163 mm of Hg and not 136 mm of Hg. We regret the typographical error. We agree with the author that the adequate control of hypertension is the most important intervention in hypertensive retinopathy, which we have also emphasized in our report. The patient in this report was a known case of IgA nephropathy and was having labile hypertension. The prompt hypertensive control may not be feasible in these cases. The persisting edema and exudation may result in permanent visual loss in such cases. Intravitreal Bevacizumab, by decreasing intra and subretinal fluid, may thus provide a longer window for adequate control of blood pressure. It also allows early visual rehabilitation. As mentioned by authors, the endophthalmitis after Bevacizumab is rare. The reported risk of endophthalmitis after intravitreal Bevacizumab in United States and India is (0.056% and 0.08% respectively).[34] In fact Gonzalez et al. recently pointed out that infectious endophthalmitis cases occurring after the intravitreal injection of Bevacizumab is not the result of the drug or the injection technique, but rather of the compounding procedures.[5] All recommended procedures are meticulously followed at our institute for preparation of Bevacizumab aliquots. Thus the patients who are likely to benefit from this drug should not be kept devoid of this treatment in view of this rare side effect.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  5 in total

1.  Avastin doesn't blind people, people blind people.

Authors:  Serafin Gonzalez; Philip J Rosenfeld; Michael W Stewart; Jennifer Brown; Steven P Murphy
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Endophthalmitis rates among patients receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF injections: a USA claims analysis.

Authors:  Szilárd Kiss; Pravin U Dugel; Arshad M Khanani; Michael S Broder; Eunice Chang; Gordon H Sun; Adam Turpcu
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-30

3.  Comment on: Dramatic response to intravitreal bevacizumab in hypertensive retinopathy.

Authors:  Koushik Tripathy; Arpan Chaudhuri
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Real-world evidence of safety profile of intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) in an Indian scenario.

Authors:  Prashant Jain; Jay Sheth; Giridhar Anantharaman; Mahesh Gopalakrishnan
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  Dramatic response to intravitreal Bevacizumab in hypertensive retinopathy.

Authors:  Srikant Padhy; Vinod Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.848

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.