| Literature DB >> 30574353 |
Korakrit Poonsuk1, Ting-Yu Cheng1, Ju Ji2, Jeffrey Zimmerman1, Luis Giménez-Lirola1.
Abstract
The diagnostic performance of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) IgG and IgA ELISAs was evaluated using paired serum and meat juice samples collected from PEDV-negative (n = 50) and PEDV-inoculated pigs (n = 87). Serum samples were tested by PEDV (IgG, IgA) ELISAs using a procedure performed routinely at the Iowa State University-Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory (ISU-VDL). Serum samples were tested using PEDV serum IgG and IgA ELISA procedures as routinely performed at the Iowa State University-Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory (ISU-VDL). Serum samples were diluted 1:50 and conjugate concentrations were 1/20,000 for IgG and 1/3000 for IgA. Meat juice samples were tested using the serum PEDV IgG and IgA ELISAs, with modifications, i.e., meat juice samples were diluted 1:25 and conjugate concentrations were 1/40,000 for IgG and 1/10,000 for IgA. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to estimate diagnostic sensitivities and specificities over a range of sample-to-positive (S/P) cutoffs. Consistent with previous reports, this study showed that the PEDV IgG and IgA meat juice ELISAs provided excellent diagnostic performance and suggest that meat juice recovered from samples collected at slaughter could be used in routine PEDV surveillance.Entities:
Keywords: Antibody; Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay; Muscle exudate; Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus; meat juice
Year: 2018 PMID: 30574353 PMCID: PMC6297947 DOI: 10.1186/s40813-018-0107-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Porcine Health Manag ISSN: 2055-5660
Fig. 1Distribution of PEDV IgG and IgA ELISA S/P values based on testing serum and meat juice samples from PEDV-negative (n = 50) and PEDV-inoculated pigs (n = 87)
Fig. 2The association between serum and meat juice S/P results was significant for both the PEDV IgG (a) and IgA (b) ELISAs (linear regression; p < 0.0001)
Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) serum and meat juice IgG and IgA ELISA diagnostic sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) by cutoff. Estimates based on pig-matched serum and meat juice samples (n = 137 pigs)
| Cutoff (S/P)a | PEDV IgG ELISA | PEDV IgA ELISA | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Se (95% CI) | Sp (95% CI) | Se (95% CI) | Sp (95% CI) | ||
| Serum | 0.1 | 100 (95.8, 100) | 56.0 (41.3, 70.0) | 100 (95.8, 100) | 72.0 (57.5, 83.8) |
| 0.2 | 100 (95.8, 100) | 58.0 (43.2, 71.8) | 100 (95.8, 100) | 100 (92.9, 100) | |
| 0.3 | 100 (95.8, 100) | 86.0 (73.3, 94.2) | 98.9 (93.8, 100) | 100 (83.9, 100) | |
| 0.4 | 100 (95.8, 100) | 100 (92.9, 100) | 95.4 (88.6, 98.7) | 100 (83.9, 100) | |
| 0.5 | 98.9 (93.8, 100) | 100 (92.9, 100) | 94.3 (87.1, 98.1) | 100 (83.9, 100) | |
| 0.6 | 96.6 (90.3, 99.3) | 100 (83.9, 100) | 90.8 (82.7, 95.9) | 100 (83.9, 100) | |
| Meat juice | 0.1 | 100 (95.8, 100) | 98.0 (89.4, 99.9) | 100 (95.8, 100) | 94.0 (83.5, 98.7) |
| 0.2 | 100 (95.8, 100) | 100 (92.9, 100) | 97.7 (91.9, 99.7) | 96.0 (86.3, 99.5) | |
| 0.3 | 98.9 (93.8, 100) | 100 (92.9, 100) | 96.6 (90.3, 99.3) | 100 (92.9, 100) | |
| 0.4 | 93.1 (85.6, 97.4) | 100 (92.9, 100) | 94.3 (87.1, 98.1) | 100 (92.9, 100) | |
| 0.5 | 89.7 (81.3, 95.2) | 100 (92.9, 100) | 88.5 (79.9, 94.3) | 100 (92.9, 100) | |
| 0.6 | 85.1 (75.8, 91.8) | 100 (92.9, 100) | 83.9 (74.5, 90.9) | 100 (92.9, 100) | |
aSample-to-positive (S/P) = (sample OD – blank well control mean OD)/(positive control mean OD – blank well control mean OD)