| Literature DB >> 30574072 |
Chika Sato1,2, Kazuhiko Sawada3, David Wright4,5, Tatsuya Higashi1,2, Ichio Aoki1,2.
Abstract
MRI observations following in vivo administration of Mn2+ [manganese (Mn)-enhanced MRI, MEMRI] have been used as an excellent morphological and functional MRI tool for in vivo preclinical studies. To detect brain three-dimensional (3D) microstructures, we improved the ex vivo MEMRI method for mouse brains after in vivo Mn administration and obtained high-resolution MRIs using a cryogenic radiofrequency (RF) coil. Male C57BL/6 mice (n = 8) were injected with 50 mM MnCl2 intravenously and MEMRIs of the brain were acquired in vivo after 24 h, followed by perfusion fixation with a 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) solution. High-resolution 25-μm isotropic MRIs were successfully acquired from the extracted brain tissue and could identify the brain microstructures, especially in the hippocampus [the pyramidal cell layer through CA1-3 and the dentate gyrus (DG) granular layers (GLs)], cell layers of cerebellum, three sub-regions of the deep cerebellar nucleus, and white matter (WM) structures [e.g., the fasciculus retroflexus (fr) and optic tract in the thalamus]. The following technical conditions were also examined: (i) the longitudinal stability of Mn-enhanced ex vivo tissue after in vivo administration; and (ii) the effects of mixing glutaraldehyde (GA) with the fixative solution for the preservation of in vivo MEMRI contrast. Our results indicate that ex vivo MEMRI observations made shortly after fixation maintain the contrast observed in vivo. This research will be useful for non-destructive whole-brain pathological analysis.Entities:
Keywords: MEMRI; ex vivo MEMRI; manganese-enhanced MRI; microstructure; neuroimaging
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30574072 PMCID: PMC6291442 DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2018.00110
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neural Circuits ISSN: 1662-5110 Impact factor: 3.492
Figure 1Overview of experimental procedures. Twelve mice were injected with manganese chloride (MnCl2) and scanned using a 7-T preclinical MRI 24 h and 7 days later (in vivo MRI).
Sample preparation and procedures for each group in Experiment 1.
| NoMn | 5 | − | + | + | + |
| Mn0d | 5 | + | + | + | − |
| Mn7d | 3 | + | + | − | + |
| 2.5% GA | 2 | + | + | + | + |
| 1% GA | 2 | + | + | + | + |
Figure 2Observable differences between in vivo and ex vivo Mn-enhanced MRI (MEMRI). (A,E,I,M,Q) Typical examples of T1-weighted (T1W) images of in vivo and ex vivo MEMRI for Mn0d group. (Left to right) Histological from Paxinos and Franklin (2013), in vivo without Mn administration (75 μm), in vivo with Mn (75 μm), ex vivo low resolution (75 μm), ex vivo high resolution (25 μm) images. We used 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) following saline for perfusion fixation. Scale bar: 1 mm. Magnified images in the hippocampus (B,F,J,N,R; HPC, Bregma −2.18 mm), cerebellum (C,G,K,O,S; Bregma −6.00 mm), and thalamus (D,H,L,P,T; Th, Bregma −2.46 mm). Single-averaging data were presented for (Q–T) due to the artifact. cc, corpus callosum; CA1, Ammon’s horn 1; CA3, Ammon’s horn 3; DG, dentate gyrus; Py, pyramidal cell layer; GCL, granular cell layer; ML, molecular cell layer; WM, white matter; Med, medial cerebellar nucleus; Int, interposed cerebellar nucleus; Lat, lateral cerebellar nucleus; LVe, lateral vestibular nucleus; MVePC, medial vestibular nucleus, parvicellular part; Pr, prepostius nucleus; DC, dorsal cochlear nucleus; icp, inferior cerebellar peduncle; 4V, 4th ventricle; fr, fasciculus retroflexus; ml, medial lemniscus; eml, external medullary lamina; cp, cerebral peduncle; LV, lateral ventricle; SE, spin echo image; and GE, gradient echo image.
Figure 3Comparison of relaxation rate (R1, R2) and contrast between in vivo and ex vivo MEMRI. R1 (A) and R2 (B) at the cerebral cortex between in vivo and ex vivo (NoMn: n = 5; Mn0d; n = 5). R1 and R2 were calculated as a mean value of the cortex between the right and left hemispheres. The z-scores of signal profile of the brain (C), which are indicated by the broken lines in the inset image, were calculated from the T1-weighted (T1W) image; the averages of z-scores for the in vivo (black, n = 5) and ex vivo (red, n = 5) cases are presented. NoMn, No Mn administration; Mn0d, Mn administered 0 d after fixation. The error bar shows the standard error of the mean (SEM). *P < 0.05.
Figure 4Contrast alterations of ex vivo MEMRI after fixation. Differences between Mn-enhanced samples scanned shortly (Mn0d, D–F, as same as Figure 2) and 7 days (Mn7d, G–I) after perfusion fixation, and an example of ex vivo MEMRI without Mn administration (NoMn, shortly after perfusion fixation, A–C). Magnified images of the cortex (B,E,F) and hippocampus (HPC, C,F,I). The white arrowheads in (F) show the GCL in the DG and the pyramidal cell layer of the Ammon’s horn. CA1, Ammon’s horn 1; CA3, Ammon’s horn 3; DG, dentate gyrus; cc, corpus callosum. Scale bar: 1 mm.
Figure 5Effects of GA fixation. (A) The T1W images obtained through ex vivo MEMRI are shown. (Left to right) Low spatial resolution (75 μm) and high spatial resolution (25 μm) shortly after fixation. The ex vivo samples were fixated using 2.5% GA in PFA (top), and 1% GA in PFA (bottom). Scale bar: 1 mm. (B) The graph shows the ratio of brain volumes of ex vivo and in vivo samples. (C,D) Longitudinal comparison of R1 (C) and (D) R2 between samples prepared using 4% PFA alone and 1% GA in PFA. PFA, paraformaldehyde; GA, glutaraldehyde.