Literature DB >> 30574058

Perioperative Thromboelastometry for Adult Living Donor Liver Transplant Recipients with a Tendency to Hypercoagulability: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

Yasmin Kamel1, Ashraf Hassanin1, Abdel Rahman Ahmed2, Emad Gad3, Mohamed Afifi2, Magdy Khalil1, Klaus Görlinger4,5, Khaled Yassen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hypercoagulability can lead to serious thromboembolic events. The aim of this study was to assess the perioperative coagulation status in liver transplant recipients with a tendency to hypercoagulability.
METHODS: In a prospective observational study (South African Cochrane Registry 201405000814129), 151 potential liver transplant recipients were screened for thrombophilic factors from October 2014 to June 2017, and 57 potential recipients fulfilled the inclusion criterion of presenting two or more of the following thrombophilic factors: low protein C, low protein S, low anti-thrombin, increased homocystein, increased antiphospholipid IgG/IgM antibodies, increased lupus anticoagulant, and positive Factor V Leiden mutation. Seven patients were excluded from the study because they fulfilled the exclusion criteria of cancelling the liver transplantation, oral anticoagulation, or intraoperative treatment with rFVIIa. Accordingly, 50 patients were included in the final analysis. Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) (EXTEM, INTEM and FIBTEM) and conventional coagulation tests (CCT) were performed preoperatively, during the anhepatic phase, post reperfusion, and on postoperative days (POD) 1, 3 and 7. ROTEM was used to guide blood product transfusion. Heparin was infused (60-180 U/kg/day) postoperatively for 3 days and then was replaced by low-molecular-weight heparin (20 mg/12 h).
RESULTS: FIBTEM MCF significantly increased postoperatively above reference range on POD 7 despite normal fibrinogen plasma concentrations (p < 0.05). Both EXTEM and INTEM demonstrated significant changes with the phases of transplantation (p < 0.05), but with no intra- or postoperative hypercoagulability observed. INTEM CT (reference range, 100-240 s) normalized on POD 3 and 7 (196.1 ± 69.0 and 182.7 ± 63.8 s, respectively), despite prolonged aPTT (59.7 ± 18.7 and 46.4 ± 15.7 s, respectively; reference range, 20-40 s). Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) were reported in 12.0% and 2.0%, respectively, mainly after critical care discharge and with high FIBTEM MCF values in 57% on POD 3 and 86% on POD 7. Receiver operating characteristics curve analyses of FIBTEM MCF were significant predictors for thromboembolic events with optimum cut-off, area under the curve and standard error on POD 3 (>23 mm, 0.779 and 0.097; p = 0.004) and POD 7 (>28 mm, 0.706 and 0.089; p = 0.020). Red blood cells (mean ± SD, 8.68 ± 5.81 units) were transfused in 76%, fresh frozen plasma (8.26 ± 4.14 units) in 62%, and cryoprecipitate (12.0 ± 3.68 units) in 28% of recipients. None of the recipients received intraoperative platelet transfusion or any postoperative transfusion. Main transplant indication was hepatitis C infection in 82%. 76% of recipients included in this highly selected patient population showed increased lupus anticoagulant, 2% increased antiphospholipid IgG/IgM antibodies, 20% increased homocysteine, 74% decreased anti-thrombin, 78% decreased protein C, 34% decreased protein S, and 24% a positive Factor V Leiden mutation. Overall 1-year survival was 62%.
CONCLUSION: A significant postoperative step-wise increase in FIBTEM MCF beyond the reference range was observed despite normal fibrinogen plasma concentrations, and FIBTEM MCF was a predictor for thromboembolic events in this study population, particularly after POD 3 and 7 on surgical wards when CCTs failed to detect this condition. However, the predictive value of FIBTEM MCF for postoperative HAT and PVT needs to be confirmed in a larger patient population. A ROTEM-guided anticoagulation regime needs to be developed and investigated in future studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult living donor liver transplantation; Fibrinogen; Hypercoagulability; Thromboelastometry; Thrombosis

Year:  2018        PMID: 30574058      PMCID: PMC6288633          DOI: 10.1159/000489605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother        ISSN: 1660-3796            Impact factor:   3.747


  57 in total

1.  Portal vein thrombosis in cirrhotics: related with anticardiolipin antibodies?

Authors:  Gürol Oksüzoglu; Yusuf Bayraktar; Serap Arslan; Ismail Celik; Mehmet Arslan; Bülent Sivri; Serafettin Kirazli; Burhan Kayhan
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct

Review 2.  Paucity of studies to support that abnormal coagulation test results predict bleeding in the setting of invasive procedures: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Jodi B Segal; Walter H Dzik
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 3.  [Coagulation management during liver transplantation].

Authors:  K Görlinger
Journal:  Hamostaseologie       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.778

Review 4.  Preventing deep vein thrombosis in hospital inpatients.

Authors:  William E Cayley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-07-21

5.  Thromboelastography maximum amplitude predicts postoperative thrombotic complications including myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Douglas J McCrath; Elisabetta Cerboni; Robert J Frumento; Andrew L Hirsh; Elliott Bennett-Guerrero
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Hypercoagulability is most prevalent early after injury and in female patients.

Authors:  Martin A Schreiber; Jerome Differding; Per Thorborg; John C Mayberry; Richard J Mullins
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2005-03

7.  High incidence of thrombotic complications early after liver transplantation for familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy.

Authors:  Miguel Bispo; Paulo Marcelino; António Freire; Américo Martins; Luís Mourão; Eduardo Barroso
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.782

8.  Factor V Leiden and hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Ty B Dunn; Michael A Linden; Gregory M Vercellotti; Rainer W G Gruessner
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.863

9.  A study on changes of coagulation inhibitors and fibrinolysis inhibitors in patients with liver cirrhosis and hepatoma.

Authors:  C J Park; H I Cho; S I Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 10.  Reporting methods of blinding in randomized trials assessing nonpharmacological treatments.

Authors:  Isabelle Boutron; Lydia Guittet; Candice Estellat; David Moher; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  4 in total

1.  Risk Factors for Transfusion after Orthotopic Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Ana Paula Hitomi Yokoyama; José Mauro Kutner; Araci Massami Sakashita; Cristiane Yoshie Nakazawa; Tatiana Almeida Omura de Paula; Raffael Perreira Cezar Zamper; Pamella Tung Pedroso; Marcio Dias de Almeida; Sergio Paiva Meira Filho; Fernanda Andrade Orsi
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.747

2.  The role of evidence-based algorithms for rotational thromboelastometry-guided bleeding management.

Authors:  Klaus Görlinger; Antonio Pérez-Ferrer; Daniel Dirkmann; Fuat Saner; Marc Maegele; Ángel Augusto Pérez Calatayud; Tae-Yop Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-05-17

Review 3.  2020 Clinical Update in Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Trevor J Wilke; Bradley A Fremming; Brittany A Brown; Nicholas W Markin; Cale A Kassel
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 4.  Questions about COVID-19 associated coagulopathy: possible answers from the viscoelastic tests.

Authors:  Vittorio Pavoni; Lara Gianesello; Maddalena Pazzi; Pietro Dattolo; Domenico Prisco
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 1.977

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.