Literature DB >> 30573691

Clinical and Genomic Implications of Luminal and Basal Subtypes Across Carcinomas.

Shuang G Zhao1, William S Chen2,3, Rajdeep Das3, S Laura Chang3, Scott A Tomlins4, Jonathan Chou3, David A Quigley3, Ha X Dang5, Travis J Barnard3, Brandon A Mahal6, Ewan A Gibb7, Yang Liu7, Elai Davicioni7, Linda R Duska8, Edwin M Posadas9, Shruti Jolly10, Daniel E Spratt10, Paul L Nguyen6, Christopher A Maher5, Eric J Small11, Felix Y Feng3,11,12.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Carcinomas originate from epithelial tissues, which have apical (luminal) and basal orientations. The degree of luminal versus basal differentiation in cancer has been shown to be biologically important in some carcinomas and impacts treatment response. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Although prior studies have focused on individual cancer types, we used a modified clinical-grade classifier (PAM50) to subtype 8,764 tumors across 22 different carcinomas into luminal A, luminal B, and basal-like tumors.
RESULTS: We found that all epithelial tumors demonstrated similar gene expression-based luminal/basal subtypes. As expected, basal-like tumors were associated with increased expression of the basal markers KRT5/6 and KRT14, and luminal-like tumors were associated with increased expression of the luminal markers KRT20. Luminal A tumors consistently had improved outcomes compared with basal across many tumor types, with luminal B tumors falling between the two. Basal tumors had the highest rates of TP53 and RB1 mutations and copy number loss. Luminal breast, cervical, ovarian, and endometrial tumors had increased ESR1 expression, and luminal prostate, breast, cervical, and bladder tumors had increased androgen receptor (AR) expression. Furthermore, luminal B tumors had the highest rates of AR and ESR1 mutations and had increased sensitivity in vitro to bicalutamide and tamoxifen. Luminal B tumors were more sensitive to gemcitabine, and basal tumors were more sensitive to docetaxel.
CONCLUSIONS: This first pan-carcinoma luminal/basal subtyping across epithelial tumors reveals global similarities across carcinomas in the transcriptome, genome, clinical outcomes, and drug sensitivity, emphasizing the biological and translational importance of these luminal versus basal subtypes. ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30573691     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  26 in total

Review 1.  Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Prostate Cancer Development: Therapeutic Implications.

Authors:  Ugo Testa; Germana Castelli; Elvira Pelosi
Journal:  Medicines (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-30

Review 2.  A Tale of Two Cancers: A Current Concise Overview of Breast and Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Franklyn De Silva; Jane Alcorn
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Therapeutic Implications for Intrinsic Phenotype Classification of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Ilsa M Coleman; Navonil DeSarkar; Colm Morrissey; Li Xin; Martine P Roudier; Erolcan Sayar; Dapei Li; Eva Corey; Michael C Haffner; Peter S Nelson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 13.801

4.  Analysis of the Transcriptome: Regulation of Cancer Stemness in Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ by Vitamin D Compounds.

Authors:  Naing Lin Shan; Audrey Minden; Philip Furmanski; Min Ji Bak; Li Cai; Roman Wernyj; Davit Sargsyan; David Cheng; Renyi Wu; Hsiao-Chen D Kuo; Shanyi N Li; Mingzhu Fang; Hubert Maehr; Ah-Ng Kong; Nanjoo Suh
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2020-05-28

5.  Genomic and clinical characterization of stromal infiltration markers in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Brandon A Mahal; Mohammed Alshalalfa; Shuang G Zhao; Himisha Beltran; William S Chen; Fallon Chipidza; Elai Davicioni; R Jeffrey Karnes; Sheng-Yu Ku; Tamara L Lotan; Vinayak Muralidhar; Timothy R Rebbeck; Edward M Schaeffer; Daniel E Spratt; Felix Y Feng; Paul L Nguyen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  The early-stage triple-negative breast cancer landscape derives a novel prognostic signature and therapeutic target.

Authors:  Yun-Song Yang; Yi-Xing Ren; Cheng-Lin Liu; Shuang Hao; Xiao-En Xu; Xi Jin; Yi-Zhou Jiang; Zhi-Ming Shao
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Gene expression profiles define molecular subtypes of prostate cancer bone metastases with different outcomes and morphology traceable back to the primary tumor.

Authors:  Elin Thysell; Linda Vidman; Erik Bovinder Ylitalo; Emma Jernberg; Sead Crnalic; Diego Iglesias-Gato; Amilcar Flores-Morales; Pär Stattin; Lars Egevad; Anders Widmark; Patrik Rydén; Anders Bergh; Pernilla Wikström
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 6.603

8.  Cancer Classification at the Crossroads.

Authors:  Antonino Carbone
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Transcriptional profiling of primary prostate tumor in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and association with clinical outcomes: correlative analysis of the E3805 CHAARTED trial.

Authors:  A A Hamid; H-C Huang; V Wang; Y-H Chen; F Feng; R Den; G Attard; E M Van Allen; P T Tran; D E Spratt; R Dittamore; E Davicioni; G Liu; R DiPaola; M A Carducci; C J Sweeney
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Expression of GP88 (Progranulin) Protein Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Prostate Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Amer Abdulrahman; Markus Eckstein; Rudolf Jung; Juan Guzman; Katrin Weigelt; Ginette Serrero; Binbin Yue; Carol Geppert; Robert Stöhr; Arndt Hartmann; Bernd Wullich; Sven Wach; Helge Taubert; Verena Lieb
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.