Eugene P Rhee1, Sushrut S Waikar2, Casey M Rebholz3,4, Zihe Zheng5, Regis Perichon6, Clary B Clish7, Anne M Evans6, Julian Avila7, Michelle R Denburg8, Amanda Hyre Anderson5, Ramachandran S Vasan9, Harold I Feldman5,10, Paul L Kimmel11, Josef Coresh12,4. 1. Nephrology Division and Endocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; eprhee@partners.org coresh@jhu.edu. 2. Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. 4. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland. 5. Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics. 6. Metabolon, Inc., Durham, North Carolina. 7. Metabolite Profiling, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 8. Division of Nephrology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and. 9. Sections of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology and Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; and. 10. Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 11. Division of Kidney Urologic and Hematologic Diseases, National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 12. Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; eprhee@partners.org coresh@jhu.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Nontargeted metabolomics can measure thousands of low-molecular-weight biochemicals, but important gaps limit its utility for biomarker discovery in CKD. These include the need to characterize technical and intraperson analyte variation, to pool data across platforms, and to outline analyte relationships with eGFR. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Plasma samples from 49 individuals with CKD (eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and/or ≥1 g proteinuria) were examined from two study visits; 20 samples were repeated as blind replicates. To enable comparison across two nontargeted platforms, samples were profiled at Metabolon and the Broad Institute. RESULTS: The Metabolon platform reported 837 known metabolites and 483 unnamed compounds (selected from 44,953 unknown ion features). The Broad Institute platform reported 594 known metabolites and 26,106 unknown ion features. Median coefficients of variation (CVs) across blind replicates were 14.6% (Metabolon) and 6.3% (Broad Institute) for known metabolites, and 18.9% for (Metabolon) unnamed compounds and 24.5% for (Broad Institute) unknown ion features. Median CVs for day-to-day variability were 29.0% (Metabolon) and 24.9% (Broad Institute) for known metabolites, and 41.8% for (Metabolon) unnamed compounds and 40.9% for (Broad Institute) unknown ion features. A total of 381 known metabolites were shared across platforms (median correlation 0.89). Many metabolites were negatively correlated with eGFR at P<0.05, including 35.7% (Metabolon) and 18.9% (Broad Institute) of known metabolites. CONCLUSIONS: Nontargeted metabolomics quantifies >1000 analytes with low technical CVs, and agreement for overlapping metabolites across two leading platforms is excellent. Many metabolites demonstrate substantial intraperson variation and correlation with eGFR.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Nontargeted metabolomics can measure thousands of low-molecular-weight biochemicals, but important gaps limit its utility for biomarker discovery in CKD. These include the need to characterize technical and intraperson analyte variation, to pool data across platforms, and to outline analyte relationships with eGFR. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Plasma samples from 49 individuals with CKD (eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and/or ≥1 g proteinuria) were examined from two study visits; 20 samples were repeated as blind replicates. To enable comparison across two nontargeted platforms, samples were profiled at Metabolon and the Broad Institute. RESULTS: The Metabolon platform reported 837 known metabolites and 483 unnamed compounds (selected from 44,953 unknown ion features). The Broad Institute platform reported 594 known metabolites and 26,106 unknown ion features. Median coefficients of variation (CVs) across blind replicates were 14.6% (Metabolon) and 6.3% (Broad Institute) for known metabolites, and 18.9% for (Metabolon) unnamed compounds and 24.5% for (Broad Institute) unknown ion features. Median CVs for day-to-day variability were 29.0% (Metabolon) and 24.9% (Broad Institute) for known metabolites, and 41.8% for (Metabolon) unnamed compounds and 40.9% for (Broad Institute) unknown ion features. A total of 381 known metabolites were shared across platforms (median correlation 0.89). Many metabolites were negatively correlated with eGFR at P<0.05, including 35.7% (Metabolon) and 18.9% (Broad Institute) of known metabolites. CONCLUSIONS: Nontargeted metabolomics quantifies >1000 analytes with low technical CVs, and agreement for overlapping metabolites across two leading platforms is excellent. Many metabolites demonstrate substantial intraperson variation and correlation with eGFR.
Authors: Mary K Townsend; Clary B Clish; Peter Kraft; Chen Wu; Amanda L Souza; Amy A Deik; Shelley S Tworoger; Brian M Wolpin Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2013-07-29 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Jared R Mayers; Chen Wu; Clary B Clish; Peter Kraft; Margaret E Torrence; Brian P Fiske; Chen Yuan; Ying Bao; Mary K Townsend; Shelley S Tworoger; Shawn M Davidson; Thales Papagiannakopoulos; Annan Yang; Talya L Dayton; Shuji Ogino; Meir J Stampfer; Edward L Giovannucci; Zhi Rong Qian; Douglas A Rubinson; Jing Ma; Howard D Sesso; John Michael Gaziano; Barbara B Cochrane; Simin Liu; Jean Wactawski-Wende; JoAnn E Manson; Michael N Pollak; Alec C Kimmelman; Amanda Souza; Kerry Pierce; Thomas J Wang; Robert E Gerszten; Charles S Fuchs; Matthew G Vander Heiden; Brian M Wolpin Journal: Nat Med Date: 2014-09-28 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Eugene P Rhee; Qiong Yang; Bing Yu; Xuan Liu; Susan Cheng; Amy Deik; Kerry A Pierce; Kevin Bullock; Jennifer E Ho; Daniel Levy; Jose C Florez; Sek Kathiresan; Martin G Larson; Ramachandran S Vasan; Clary B Clish; Thomas J Wang; Eric Boerwinkle; Christopher J O'Donnell; Robert E Gerszten Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Eugene P Rhee; Aditya Surapaneni; Zihe Zheng; Linda Zhou; Diptavo Dutta; Dan E Arking; Jingning Zhang; ThuyVy Duong; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Shengyuan Luo; Pascal Schlosser; Rupal Mehta; Sushrut S Waikar; Santosh L Saraf; Tanika N Kelly; Lee L Hamm; Panduranga S Rao; Anna V Mathew; Chi-Yuan Hsu; Afshin Parsa; Ramachandran S Vasan; Paul L Kimmel; Clary B Clish; Josef Coresh; Harold I Feldman; Morgan E Grams Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Arthur M Lee; Jian Hu; Yunwen Xu; Alison G Abraham; Rui Xiao; Josef Coresh; Casey Rebholz; Jingsha Chen; Eugene P Rhee; Harold I Feldman; Vasan S Ramachandran; Paul L Kimmel; Bradley A Warady; Susan L Furth; Michelle R Denburg Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2022-01-11 Impact factor: 14.978
Authors: Minoo Bagheri; Walter Willett; Mary K Townsend; Peter Kraft; Kerry L Ivey; Eric B Rimm; Kathryn Marie Wilson; Karen H Costenbader; Elizabeth W Karlson; Elizabeth M Poole; Oana A Zeleznik; A Heather Eliassen Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2020-12-10 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Lakshmi L Ganesan; Frank J O'Brien; Tammy L Sirich; Natalie S Plummer; Rita Sheth; Cecile Fajardo; Paul Brakeman; Scott M Sutherland; Timothy W Meyer Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2021-07-07 Impact factor: 10.614
Authors: Hyunju Kim; Cheryl Am Anderson; Emily A Hu; Zihe Zheng; Lawrence J Appel; Jiang He; Harold I Feldman; Amanda H Anderson; Ana C Ricardo; Zeenat Bhat; Tanika N Kelly; Jing Chen; Ramachandran S Vasan; Paul L Kimmel; Morgan E Grams; Josef Coresh; Clary B Clish; Eugene P Rhee; Casey M Rebholz Journal: J Nutr Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 4.687