Literature DB >> 3057320

Thermal, metabolic, and cardiovascular changes in men and women during cold stress.

T E Graham1.   

Abstract

Our understanding of the responses of men and women to cold stress is extremely limited. Various scientists have suggested that there could be gender differences in thermoregulatory responses due to sexual dimorphism in body fatness and its distribution, in body surface area, and in mass. In addition, there are also several lines of evidence supporting the hypothesis that there are gender-specific physiological responses to body cooling. In cold water studies, women cool more rapidly than men when at rest; this potentially greater stimulus does not result in a greater metabolic response by the women. If both groups increase their metabolism by performing a prescribed amount of exercise, there are no differences in body cooling. However, if they exercise spontaneously, the women select a lower metabolic rate and experience greater body cooling. Thus, it appears that women are less thermally sensitive to cold water. In cold air stress women have a lower mean skin temperature than men, but this is not observed in peripheral skin sites. In contrast to cold water, women do not experience greater drops in deep body temperature than men in cold air. Furthermore, men may be more metabolically sensitive than women to cold air stress. Men also respond to cold air with a bradycardia and increased stroke volume, while women show no change in these parameters. Similarly, men show a greater blood pressure response than women to local cooling of a hand or the face. Many of these gender-specific responses cannot be explained fully by differences in body morphology and support the concept that men and women respond differently to the cold.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3057320     DOI: 10.1249/00005768-198810001-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  12 in total

1.  National Athletic Trainers' Association position statement: environmental cold injuries.

Authors:  Thomas A Cappaert; Jennifer A Stone; John W Castellani; Bentley Andrew Krause; Daniel Smith; Bradford A Stephens
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  Clothing and exercise. I: Biophysics of heat transfer between the individual, clothing and environment.

Authors:  D D Pascoe; L A Shanley; E W Smith
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Seasonal variations in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Simon Stewart; Ashley K Keates; Adele Redfern; John J V McMurray
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 4.  Physiology of exercise in the cold.

Authors:  T J Doubt
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Sex differences in thermal pain sensitivity and sympathetic reactivity for two strains of rat.

Authors:  Charles J Vierck; Antonio J Acosta-Rua; Heather L Rossi; John K Neubert
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 5.820

6.  Weather-induced ischemia and arrhythmia in patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation: another difference between men and women.

Authors:  Alexandra Schneider; Angela Schuh; Friedrich-Karl Maetzel; Regina Rückerl; Susanne Breitner; Annette Peters
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 3.787

Review 7.  Metabolic adaptations to exercise in the cold. An update.

Authors:  R J Shephard
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Seasonality of acute kidney injury in a tertiary hospital academic center: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  Gianmarco Lombardi; Giovanni Gambaro; Nicoletta Pertica; Alessandro Naticchia; Matteo Bargagli; Pietro Manuel Ferraro
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 5.984

9.  A heat and moisture-exchanging mask impairs self-paced maximal running performance in a sub-zero environment.

Authors:  Alasdair S Tutt; Hampus Persson; Erik P Andersson; Mats Ainegren; Nikolai Stenfors; Helen G Hanstock
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Sclerostin and bone remodeling biomarkers responses to whole-body cryotherapy (- 110 °C) in healthy young men with different physical fitness levels.

Authors:  Anna Straburzyńska-Lupa; Tomasz Cisoń; Marta Gomarasca; Anna Babińska; Giuseppe Banfi; Giovanni Lombardi; Ewa Śliwicka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.